Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation
Identifieur interne : 001265 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001264; suivant : 001266Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation
Auteurs : Misako Kuroe ; Noriyuki Yamaguchi ; Taku Kadoya ; Tadashi MiyashitaSource :
- Oikos [ 0030-1299 ] ; 2011-02.
Abstract
It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title><author><name sortKey="Kuroe, Misako" sort="Kuroe, Misako" uniqKey="Kuroe M" first="Misako" last="Kuroe">Misako Kuroe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yamaguchi, Noriyuki" sort="Yamaguchi, Noriyuki" uniqKey="Yamaguchi N" first="Noriyuki" last="Yamaguchi">Noriyuki Yamaguchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kadoya, Taku" sort="Kadoya, Taku" uniqKey="Kadoya T" first="Taku" last="Kadoya">Taku Kadoya</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Miyashita, Tadashi" sort="Miyashita, Tadashi" uniqKey="Miyashita T" first="Tadashi" last="Miyashita">Tadashi Miyashita</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001265</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001265</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title><author><name sortKey="Kuroe, Misako" sort="Kuroe, Misako" uniqKey="Kuroe M" first="Misako" last="Kuroe">Misako Kuroe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yamaguchi, Noriyuki" sort="Yamaguchi, Noriyuki" uniqKey="Yamaguchi N" first="Noriyuki" last="Yamaguchi">Noriyuki Yamaguchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kadoya, Taku" sort="Kadoya, Taku" uniqKey="Kadoya T" first="Taku" last="Kadoya">Taku Kadoya</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Miyashita, Tadashi" sort="Miyashita, Tadashi" uniqKey="Miyashita T" first="Tadashi" last="Miyashita">Tadashi Miyashita</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Oikos</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Oikos</title><idno type="ISSN">0030-1299</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0706</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">120</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="271">271</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0030-1299</idno></series><idno type="istex">01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OIK18697</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0030-1299</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Misako Kuroe</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Noriyuki Yamaguchi</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Taku Kadoya</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tadashi Miyashita</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>OIK18697</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.5</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2089</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6604</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40685</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>292</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>120</volume><publisherId><json:string>OIK</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>279</last><first>271</first></pages><issn><json:string>0030-1299</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1600-0706</json:string></eissn><title>Oikos</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0706</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</json:string></doi><id>01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730</id><score>0.04042069</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 The Authors</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Misako</forename><surname>Kuroe</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Noriyuki</forename><surname>Yamaguchi</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Taku</forename><surname>Kadoya</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Tadashi</forename><surname>Miyashita</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Oikos</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Oikos</title><idno type="pISSN">0030-1299</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0706</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0706</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">120</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="271">271</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OIK18697</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0706</doi><issn type="print">0030-1299</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0706</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="OIK"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="OIKOS">Oikos</title><title type="short">Oikos</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/more.2010.120.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="120">120</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-02">February 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="14" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="OIK18697"></id><id type="supplier" value="oik18697"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 The Authors</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.3 mode:FullText" date="2011-01-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-09-03"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-09-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="271">271</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="279">279</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>M. Kuroe, Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan. E‐mail: <email>chloe@nature.waseda.ac.jp</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:OIK.OIK18697.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Paper manuscript accepted 14 June 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="3"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="58"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Misako</givenNames><familyName>Kuroe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Noriyuki</givenNames><familyName>Yamaguchi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Taku</givenNames><familyName>Kadoya</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Tadashi</givenNames><familyName>Miyashita</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="JP"><unparsedAffiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="JP"><unparsedAffiliation>Environmental Biology Division, National Inst. for Environmental Studies, 16‐2 Onogawa, Tsukuba‐City, JP–305‐8506 Ibaraki, Japan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Misako</namePart><namePart type="family">Kuroe</namePart><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Noriyuki</namePart><namePart type="family">Yamaguchi</namePart><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Taku</namePart><namePart type="family">Kadoya</namePart><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tadashi</namePart><namePart type="family">Miyashita</namePart><affiliation>Dept of Ecosystem Studies, School of Agriculture and Life Science, Univ. of Tokyo, 1‐1‐1 Yayoi, Bunkyo‐ku, JP–113‐8657 Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02</dateIssued><edition>Paper manuscript accepted 14 June 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">3</extent><extent unit="references">58</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">It has been increasingly recognized that landscape matrices are an important factor determining patch connectivity and hence the population size of organisms living in highly fragmented landscapes. However, most previous studies estimated the effect of matrix heterogeneity using prior information regarding dispersal or habitat preferences of a focal organism. Here we estimated matrix resistance of harvest mice in agricultural landscapes using a novel pattern‐oriented modeling with Bayesian estimation and no prior information, and then conducted model validation using data sets independent from those used for model construction. First, we investigated the distribution patterns of harvest mice for approximately 400 habitat patches, and estimated matrix resistance for different matrix types using statistical models incorporating patch size, patch environment, and patch connectivity. We used Bayesian estimation with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and searched for appropriate matrix resistance that best explained the distribution pattern. Patch connectivity as well as patch quality was an important determinant of local population size for the harvest mice. Moreover, matrix resistance was far from uniform, with rice and crop fields exhibiting low resistance and forests, creeks, roads and residential areas showing much higher resistance. The deviance explained by this model (heterogeneous matrix model) was much larger than that obtained by the model with no consideration of matrix heterogeneity (homogeneous matrix model). Second, we obtained distribution data from five additional landscapes that were more fragmented than that used for model construction, and used them for model validation. The heterogeneous matrix model well predicted the population size for four out of five landscapes. In contrast, the homogeneous model considerably overestimated population sizes in all cases. Our approach is widely applicable to species living in fragmented landscapes, especially those for which prior information regarding movement or dispersal is difficult to obtain.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Oikos</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Oikos</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0030-1299</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0706</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0706</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">OIK</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>120</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>271</start><end>279</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18697.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">OIK18697</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Authors</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001265 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001265 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:01FD606B51855A41711152014669C188F4B9D730
|texte= Matrix heterogeneity affects population size of the harvest mice: Bayesian estimation of matrix resistance and model validation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |