Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards
Identifieur interne : 001215 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001214; suivant : 001216Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards
Auteurs : Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley ; Carol Kendall ; Keith LoagueSource :
- Water Resources Research [ 0043-1397 ] ; 2008-07.
Abstract
California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO42−) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO42− budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO42− across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO42− concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO42−] and δ34S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO42−] and δ34S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO42−] and δ34S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO42− mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.
Url:
DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006672
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title><author><name sortKey="Hinckley, Eve Yn S" sort="Hinckley, Eve Yn S" uniqKey="Hinckley E" first="Eve-Lyn S." last="Hinckley">Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ehinckley@stanford.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kendall, Carol" sort="Kendall, Carol" uniqKey="Kendall C" first="Carol" last="Kendall">Carol Kendall</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>U.S. Geological Survey, California, Menlo Park, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loague, Keith" sort="Loague, Keith" uniqKey="Loague K" first="Keith" last="Loague">Keith Loague</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1029/2007WR006672</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001215</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001215</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title><author><name sortKey="Hinckley, Eve Yn S" sort="Hinckley, Eve Yn S" uniqKey="Hinckley E" first="Eve-Lyn S." last="Hinckley">Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ehinckley@stanford.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kendall, Carol" sort="Kendall, Carol" uniqKey="Kendall C" first="Carol" last="Kendall">Carol Kendall</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>U.S. Geological Survey, California, Menlo Park, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loague, Keith" sort="Loague, Keith" uniqKey="Loague K" first="Keith" last="Loague">Keith Loague</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Water Resources Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Water Resour. Res.</title><idno type="ISSN">0043-1397</idno><idno type="eISSN">1944-7973</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2008-07">2008-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">44</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="/">n/a</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="/">n/a</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0043-1397</idno></series><idno type="istex">1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006672</idno><idno type="ArticleID">2007WR006672</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0043-1397</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO42−) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO42− budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO42− across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO42− concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO42−] and δ34S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO42−] and δ34S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO42−] and δ34S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO42− mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Eve‐Lyn S. Hinckley</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</json:string><json:string>E-mail: ehinckley@stanford.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Carol Kendall</name><affiliations><json:string>U.S. Geological Survey, California, Menlo Park, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Keith Loague</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>preferential flow</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sulfate</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sulfur isotopes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>precision irrigation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>vineyards</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Napa Valley</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>2007WR006672</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO42−) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO42− budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO42− across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO42− concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO42−] and δ34S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO42−] and δ34S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO42−] and δ34S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO42− mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.356</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1602</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7349</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>44297</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>238</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>44</volume><publisherId><json:string>WRCR</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>14</total><last>n/a</last><first>n/a</first></pages><issn><json:string>0043-1397</json:string></issn><issue>7</issue><subject><json:item><value>Impacts of Land Use Change on Water Resources</value></json:item><json:item><value>BIOGEOSCIENCES</value></json:item><json:item><value>Sulfur cycling</value></json:item><json:item><value>Isotopic composition and chemistry</value></json:item><json:item><value>Agricultural systems</value></json:item><json:item><value>GEOCHEMISTRY</value></json:item><json:item><value>Stable isotope geochemistry</value></json:item><json:item><value>HYDROLOGY</value></json:item><json:item><value>Water management</value></json:item><json:item><value>OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL</value></json:item><json:item><value>Stable isotopes</value></json:item><json:item><value>POLICY SCIENCES</value></json:item><json:item><value>Regional planning</value></json:item><json:item><value>Regular Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1944-7973</json:string></eissn><title>Water Resources Research</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7973</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>water resources</json:string><json:string>limnology</json:string><json:string>environmental sciences</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>engineering</json:string><json:string>environmental engineering</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1029/2007WR006672</json:string></doi><id>1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7</id><score>0.036872588</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><p>Copyright 2008 by the American Geophysical Union.</p></availability><date>2008</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Tab‐delimited Table 1.Tab‐delimited Table 2.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Eve‐Lyn S.</forename><surname>Hinckley</surname></persName><email>ehinckley@stanford.edu</email><affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Carol</forename><surname>Kendall</surname></persName><affiliation>U.S. Geological Survey, California, Menlo Park, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Keith</forename><surname>Loague</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Water Resources Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Water Resour. Res.</title><idno type="pISSN">0043-1397</idno><idno type="eISSN">1944-7973</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7973</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2008-07"></date><biblScope unit="volume">44</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="/">n/a</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="/">n/a</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006672</idno><idno type="ArticleID">2007WR006672</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO42−) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO42− budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO42− across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO42− concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO42−] and δ34S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO42−] and δ34S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO42−] and δ34S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO42− mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>preferential flow</term></item><item><term>sulfate</term></item><item><term>sulfur isotopes</term></item><item><term>precision irrigation</term></item><item><term>vineyards</term></item><item><term>Napa Valley</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>index-terms</head><item><term>Impacts of Land Use Change on Water Resources</term></item><item><term>BIOGEOSCIENCES</term></item><item><term>Sulfur cycling</term></item><item><term>Isotopic composition and chemistry</term></item><item><term>Agricultural systems</term></item><item><term>GEOCHEMISTRY</term></item><item><term>Stable isotope geochemistry</term></item><item><term>HYDROLOGY</term></item><item><term>Water management</term></item><item><term>OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL</term></item><item><term>Stable isotopes</term></item><item><term>POLICY SCIENCES</term></item><item><term>Regional planning</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Regular Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-11-15">Received</change><change when="2008-04-14">Registration</change><change when="2008-07">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:lang="en" xml:id="wrcr11637"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi>10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7973</doi><issn type="print">0043-1397</issn><issn type="electronic">1944-7973</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="WRCR"></id><id type="coden" value="WRERAQ"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH">Water Resources Research</title><title type="short">Water Resour. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi>10.1002/wrcr.v44.7</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="44">44</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-07">July 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="120" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi>10.1029/2007WR006672</doi><idGroup><id type="editorialOffice" value="2007WR006672"></id><id type="society" value="W00401"></id><id type="unit" value="WRCR11637"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Regular Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Regular Article</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">Copyright 2008 by the American Geophysical Union.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2007-11-15"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2008-03-26"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2008-04-14"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-31"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="SPi Global Converter:AGUv3.44_TO_WileyML3Gv1.0.3 version:1.2; WileyML 3G Packaging Tool v1.0" date="2013-01-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-21"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">n/a</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">n/a</numbering></numberingGroup><subjectInfo><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/specialSection/LANDUSE1">Impacts of Land Use Change on Water Resources</subject><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0400">BIOGEOSCIENCES</subject><subjectInfo><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0488">Sulfur cycling</subject><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0454">Isotopic composition and chemistry</subject><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0402">Agricultural systems</subject></subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1000">GEOCHEMISTRY</subject><subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1041">Stable isotope geochemistry</subject></subjectInfo><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1800">HYDROLOGY</subject><subjectInfo><subject href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1880">Water management</subject></subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/4800">OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL</subject><subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/4870">Stable isotopes</subject></subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/6300">POLICY SCIENCES</subject><subjectInfo><subject role="crossTerm" href="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/6334">Regional planning</subject></subjectInfo></subjectInfo><selfCitationGroup><citation xml:id="wrcr11637-cit-0000" type="self"><author><familyName>Hinckley</familyName>, <givenNames>E. S.</givenNames></author>, <author><givenNames>C.</givenNames> <familyName>Kendall</familyName></author>, and <author><givenNames>K.</givenNames> <familyName>Loague</familyName></author> (<pubYear year="2008">2008</pubYear>), <articleTitle>Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</articleTitle>, <journalTitle>Water Resour. Res.</journalTitle>, <vol>44</vol>, W00401, doi:<accessionId ref="info:doi/10.1029/2007WR006672">10.1029/2007WR006672</accessionId>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:WRCR.WRCR11637.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="11"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title><title type="short">SULFUR AS A TRACER OF HYDROCHEMICAL LOSSES</title><title type="shortAuthors">Hinckley <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="wrcr11637-cr-0001" affiliationRef="#wrcr11637-aff-0001"><personName><givenNames>Eve‐Lyn S.</givenNames> <familyName>Hinckley</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email normalForm="ehinckley@stanford.edu">ehinckley@stanford.edu</email></contactDetails></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="wrcr11637-cr-0002" affiliationRef="#wrcr11637-aff-0002"><personName><givenNames>Carol</givenNames> <familyName>Kendall</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="wrcr11637-cr-0003" affiliationRef="#wrcr11637-aff-0001"><personName><givenNames>Keith</givenNames> <familyName>Loague</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="wrcr11637-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences</orgDiv><orgName>Stanford University</orgName><address><city>Stanford</city><countryPart>California</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="wrcr11637-aff-0002"><orgName>U.S. Geological Survey</orgName><address><city>Menlo Park</city><countryPart>California</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0001">preferential flow</keyword><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0002">sulfate</keyword><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0003">sulfur isotopes</keyword><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0004">precision irrigation</keyword><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0005">vineyards</keyword><keyword xml:id="wrcr11637-kwd-0006">Napa Valley</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supplementary data" mimeType="text/plain" href="urn-x:wiley:00431397:media:wrcr11637:wrcr11637-sup-0001-t01"></mediaResource><caption>Tab‐delimited Table 1.</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supplementary data" mimeType="text/plain" href="urn-x:wiley:00431397:media:wrcr11637:wrcr11637-sup-0002-t02"></mediaResource><caption>Tab‐delimited Table 2.</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><p xml:id="wrcr11637-para-0001" label="1">California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>] and <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>] and <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>] and <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>SULFUR AS A TRACER OF HYDROCHEMICAL LOSSES</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Eve‐Lyn S.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hinckley</namePart><affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: ehinckley@stanford.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Carol</namePart><namePart type="family">Kendall</namePart><affiliation>U.S. Geological Survey, California, Menlo Park, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Keith</namePart><namePart type="family">Loague</namePart><affiliation>Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California, Stanford, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-07</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2007-11-15</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2008-04-14</dateValid><edition>Hinckley, E. S., C. Kendall, and K. Loague (2008), Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00401, doi:10.1029/2007WR006672.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">11</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>California's widespread and economically important vineyards offer substantial opportunities to understand the interface between hydrology and biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. The common use of native sulfur (S) as a fumigant or soil additive provides a novel way to isotopically differentiate among sulfate (SO42−) pools, allowing the estimation of water and SO42− budgets. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the near‐surface hydrological flow paths in a vineyard during irrigation and storm events and (2) to determine how those flow paths affect the fate and transport of SO42− across seasons. Integrating hydrological theory with measurements of SO42− concentration and sulfate‐S isotopic ratios (expressed as [SO42−] and δ34S, respectively) in inputs, soil water, and leachate provided a means of determining flow paths. Low [SO42−] and δ34S in leachate during 4‐h irrigation events reflect minimal engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that preferential flow was the dominant path for water in the near surface. In contrast, high [SO42−] and δ34S values during 8‐h irrigation and storm events reflect near‐complete engagement of the soil matrix, indicating that lateral flow was the dominant pathway. Because hydrologic response and SO42− mobility are tightly coupled in these soils, the magnitude of water fluxes through the near surface controls S cycling both on and off site. These results indicate that preferential flow is an important loss pathway to consider in managing both water resources and water quality (reactive elements) in vineyard land use systems.</abstract><note type="additional physical form">Tab‐delimited Table 1.Tab‐delimited Table 2.</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>preferential flow</topic><topic>sulfate</topic><topic>sulfur isotopes</topic><topic>precision irrigation</topic><topic>vineyards</topic><topic>Napa Valley</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Water Resources Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Water Resour. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>index-terms</genre><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/specialSection/LANDUSE1">Impacts of Land Use Change on Water Resources</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0400">BIOGEOSCIENCES</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0488">Sulfur cycling</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0454">Isotopic composition and chemistry</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/0402">Agricultural systems</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1000">GEOCHEMISTRY</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1041">Stable isotope geochemistry</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1800">HYDROLOGY</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/1880">Water management</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/4800">OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/4870">Stable isotopes</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/6300">POLICY SCIENCES</topic><topic authorityURI="http://psi.agu.org/taxonomy5/6334">Regional planning</topic></subject><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Regular Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0043-1397</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1944-7973</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7973</identifier><identifier type="CODEN">WRERAQ</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">WRCR</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>44</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>n/a</start><end>n/a</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006672</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">2007WR006672</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright 2008 by the American Geophysical Union.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001215 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001215 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1378393A4FDAA25A8C04CF2BAAEF38C8187B6BB7
|texte= Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |