ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY
Identifieur interne : 001209 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001208; suivant : 001210ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY
Auteurs : John Houlahan ; W. Andrew. Marcus ; Adel ShirmohammadiSource :
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association [ 1093-474X ] ; 1992-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title><author><name sortKey="Houlahan, John" sort="Houlahan, John" uniqKey="Houlahan J" first="John" last="Houlahan">John Houlahan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marcus, W Andrew" sort="Marcus, W Andrew" uniqKey="Marcus W" first="W. Andrew." last="Marcus">W. Andrew. Marcus</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shirmohammadi, Adel" sort="Shirmohammadi, Adel" uniqKey="Shirmohammadi A" first="Adel" last="Shirmohammadi">Adel Shirmohammadi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9</idno><date when="1992" year="1992">1992</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001209</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001209</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title><author><name sortKey="Houlahan, John" sort="Houlahan, John" uniqKey="Houlahan J" first="John" last="Houlahan">John Houlahan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marcus, W Andrew" sort="Marcus, W Andrew" uniqKey="Marcus W" first="W. Andrew." last="Marcus">W. Andrew. Marcus</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shirmohammadi, Adel" sort="Shirmohammadi, Adel" uniqKey="Shirmohammadi A" first="Adel" last="Shirmohammadi">Adel Shirmohammadi</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-06">1992-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="553">553</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="567">567</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></series><idno type="istex">7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR553</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chesapeake Bay</term><term>Geographical Information System</term><term>Maryland Critical Area Act</term><term>erosion</term><term>land use planning</term><term>nonpoint source pollution</term><term>nutrients</term><term>pollution modeling</term><term>water quality</term><term>watershed management</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>John Houlahan</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Andrew. Marcus</name></json:item><json:item><name>Adel Shirmohammadi</name></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Maryland Critical Area Act</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nonpoint source pollution</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>land use planning</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>pollution modeling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>watershed management</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Chesapeake Bay</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nutrients</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>erosion</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>water quality</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Geographical Information System</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JAWR553</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.32</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>589.44 x 783.84 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1587</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6394</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43274</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>15</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>235</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>28</volume><publisherId><json:string>JAWR</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>15</total><last>567</last><first>553</first></pages><issn><json:string>1093-474X</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1752-1688</json:string></eissn><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>water resources</json:string><json:string>geosciences, multidisciplinary</json:string><json:string>engineering, environmental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>engineering</json:string><json:string>environmental engineering</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1992</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</json:string></doi><id>7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9</id><score>0.0399037</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1992</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">*Paper No. 91043 of the Water Resources Bulletin. Discussions are open until February 1, 1993.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">John</forename><surname>Houlahan</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">W. Andrew.</forename><surname>Marcus</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Adel</forename><surname>Shirmohammadi</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="pISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="553">553</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="567">567</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR553</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1992</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Maryland Critical Area Act</term></item><item><term>nonpoint source pollution</term></item><item><term>land use planning</term></item><item><term>pollution modeling</term></item><item><term>watershed management</term></item><item><term>Chesapeake Bay</term></item><item><term>nutrients</term></item><item><term>erosion</term></item><item><term>water quality</term></item><item><term>Geographical Information System</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1992-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</doi><issn type="print">1093-474X</issn><issn type="electronic">1752-1688</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JAWR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jawr.1992.28.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="28">28</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1992-06">June 1992</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0055300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JAWR553"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="15"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="553">553</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="567">567</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAWR.JAWR553.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY<link href="#fn1"><sup>1</sup></link></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>John</givenNames><familyName>Houlahan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>W. Andrew.</givenNames><familyName>Marcus</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" noteRef="#fn2"><personName><givenNames>Adel</givenNames><familyName>Shirmohammadi</familyName></personName></creator></creators><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Maryland Critical Area Act</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">nonpoint source pollution</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">land use planning</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">pollution modeling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">watershed management</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">Chesapeake Bay</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">nutrients</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">erosion</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">water quality</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">Geographical Information System</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>ABSTRACT: </b> This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><label>1</label><p>Paper No. 91043 of the <i>Water Resources Bulletin</i>. Discussions are open until February 1, 1993.</p></note><note xml:id="fn2"><label>2</label><p>Respectively, Environmental Scientist, Science Applications International Corporation, 7600‐A Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22043; Assistant Professor, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717; and Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742–5711.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY1</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John</namePart><namePart type="family">Houlahan</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W. Andrew.</namePart><namePart type="family">Marcus</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Adel</namePart><namePart type="family">Shirmohammadi</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1992-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1992</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">32</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an investigation of the effects of the Maryland Critical Area Act on generation of non‐point source loads of phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment to the Rhode River estuary. The Simple Method model, the Marcus and Kearney regression model, and the CREAMS model were used to estimate annual loads under: (1) present conditions, (2) maximum land use development allowable under the Act, and (3) two sets of future land use conditions that might occur if the Act were not in place. Results indicate that the Critical Area Act can reduce the present generation of nonpoint nutrient and sediment loadings 20–30 percent from the regulated area. These reductions can occur while preserving agricultural lands and allowing limited residential and urban development. The decrease in nutrient loadings is primarily dependent upon implementation and enforcement of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs could reduce present agricultural nutrient loadings by 90 percent to a level comparable to loadings from residential areas. The estimated effectiveness of the Critical Area Act is even greater when compared to potential future nutrient loadings if development in the area remains unregulated. Unrestricted residential and urban development could increase nutrient loadings by 200 percent to 1000 percent as compared to controlled development under Critical Area Act guidelines. The Critical Area Act primarily prevents these future increases by severely limiting woodland cutting, with lesser results obtained by requiring urban BMPs.</abstract><note type="content">*Paper No. 91043 of the Water Resources Bulletin. Discussions are open until February 1, 1993.</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Maryland Critical Area Act</topic><topic>nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>land use planning</topic><topic>pollution modeling</topic><topic>watershed management</topic><topic>Chesapeake Bay</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Geographical Information System</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1093-474X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAWR</identifier><part><date>1992</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>28</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>553</start><end>567</end><total>15</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03177.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JAWR553</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7EA9C76C1B717E434873587DBA3899364DCE68D9
|texte= ESTIMATING MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA ACVS IMPACT ON FUTURE NONPOINT POLLUTION ALONG THE RHODE RWER ESTUARY
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |