Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana
Identifieur interne : 001202 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001201; suivant : 001203Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana
Auteurs : Darla K. Munroe ; Abigail M. YorkSource :
- Growth and Change [ 0017-4815 ] ; 2003-08.
Abstract
Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2257.00220
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title><author><name sortKey="Munroe, Darla K" sort="Munroe, Darla K" uniqKey="Munroe D" first="Darla K." last="Munroe">Darla K. Munroe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University Of North Carolina At Charlotte dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="York, Abigail M" sort="York, Abigail M" uniqKey="York A" first="Abigail M." last="York">Abigail M. York</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-2257.00220</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001202</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001202</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title><author><name sortKey="Munroe, Darla K" sort="Munroe, Darla K" uniqKey="Munroe D" first="Darla K." last="Munroe">Darla K. Munroe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University Of North Carolina At Charlotte dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="York, Abigail M" sort="York, Abigail M" uniqKey="York A" first="Abigail M." last="York">Abigail M. York</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Growth and Change</title><idno type="ISSN">0017-4815</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2257</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-08">2003-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="299">299</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="320">320</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0017-4815</idno></series><idno type="istex">58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2257.00220</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GROW220</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0017-4815</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Darla K. Munroe</name><affiliations><json:string>University Of North Carolina At Charlotte dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Abigail M. York</name><affiliations><json:string>Indiana University, Bloomington</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>GROW220</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.296</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>389.608 x 649 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1554</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7817</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>52214</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>22</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>233</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>34</volume><publisherId><json:string>GROW</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>22</total><last>320</last><first>299</first></pages><issn><json:string>0017-4815</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-2257</json:string></eissn><title>Growth and Change</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2257</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>planning & development</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>built environment & design</json:string><json:string>urban & regional planning</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/1468-2257.00220</json:string></doi><id>58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D</id><score>0.03741654</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Darla K.</forename><surname>Munroe</surname></persName><affiliation>University Of North Carolina At Charlotte dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Abigail M.</forename><surname>York</surname></persName><affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Growth and Change</title><idno type="pISSN">0017-4815</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2257</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2257</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-08"></date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="299">299</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="320">320</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2257.00220</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GROW220</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-08">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2257</doi><issn type="print">0017-4815</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-2257</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GROW"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GROWTH CHANGE">Growth and Change</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/grow.2003.34.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="34">34</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-08">Summer 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-2257.00220</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GROW220"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="22"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-08-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-08-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="299">299</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="320">320</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GROW.GROW220.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="38"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="9232"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title><title type="shortAuthors">GROWTH AND CHANGE, SUMMER 2003</title><title type="short">JOBS, HOUSES, AND TREES</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Darla K.</givenNames><familyName>Munroe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Abigail M.</givenNames><familyName>York</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation> University Of North Carolina At Charlotte <email>dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>JOBS, HOUSES, AND TREES</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Darla K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Munroe</namePart><affiliation>University Of North Carolina At Charlotte dkmunroe@email.uncc.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Abigail M.</namePart><namePart type="family">York</namePart><affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">38</extent><extent unit="words">9232</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Land‐use and ‐cover change is a topic of increasing concern as interest in forest and agricultural land preservation grows. Urban and residential land use is quickly replacing extractive land use in southern Indiana. The interaction between land quality and urban growth pressures is also causing secondary forest growth and forest clearing to occur jointly in a complex spatial pattern. It is argued that similar processes fuel the abandonment of agricultural land leading to private forest regrowth, changes in topography and land quality, and declining real farm product prices. However, the impact of urban growth and development on forests depends more strongly on changes in both the residential housing and labor markets. Using location quotient analysis of aggregate employment patterns, and the relationship between regional labor market changes, the extent of private forest cover was examined from 1967 to 1998. Then an econometric model of land‐use shares in forty southern Indiana counties was developed based on the net benefits to agriculture, forestland, and urban uses. To test the need to control explicitly for changes in residential demand and regional economic structure, a series of nested models was estimated. Some evidence was found that changing agricultural profitability is leading to private forest regrowth. It was also uncovered that the ratio of urban to forest land uses is better explained by incorporating measures of residential land value and industrial concentration than simply considering population density alone.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Growth and Change</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0017-4815</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-2257</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2257</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GROW</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>34</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>299</start><end>320</end><total>22</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2257.00220</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GROW220</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001202 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001202 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:58932D35E772E71964C84B449D0771ED82AFDA4D
|texte= Jobs, Houses, and Trees: Changing Regional Structure, Local Land‐Use Patterns, and Forest Cover in Southern Indiana
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |