Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs
Identifieur interne : 001193 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001192; suivant : 001194Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs
Auteurs : Charles B. Dodson ; Steven R. KoenigSource :
- Agricultural Finance Review [ 0002-1466 ] ; 2003-11-01.
Abstract
USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. Countylevel estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency FSA farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer privatesector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/00215080380001149
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title><author><name sortKey="Dodson, Charles B" sort="Dodson, Charles B" uniqKey="Dodson C" first="Charles B." last="Dodson">Charles B. Dodson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koenig, Steven R" sort="Koenig, Steven R" uniqKey="Koenig S" first="Steven R." last="Koenig">Steven R. Koenig</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/00215080380001149</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001193</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001193</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title><author><name sortKey="Dodson, Charles B" sort="Dodson, Charles B" uniqKey="Dodson C" first="Charles B." last="Dodson">Charles B. Dodson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koenig, Steven R" sort="Koenig, Steven R" uniqKey="Koenig S" first="Steven R." last="Koenig">Steven R. Koenig</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Agricultural Finance Review</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-1466</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2003-11-01">2003-11-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="193">193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="212">212</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0002-1466</idno></series><idno type="istex">B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/00215080380001149</idno><idno type="filenameID">4210630206</idno><idno type="original-pdf">4210630206.pdf</idno><idno type="href">00215080380001149.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0002-1466</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. Countylevel estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency FSA farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer privatesector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>emerald</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Charles B. Dodson</name></json:item><json:item><name>Steven R. Koenig</name></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Credit rationing</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Farm loan guarantees</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Farm Service Agency</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Federal farm credit programs</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>review-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. Countylevel estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency FSA farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer privatesector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.26</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>693</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8170</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>55489</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>105</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>63</volume><publisherId><json:string>afr</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>212</last><first>193</first></pages><issn><json:string>0002-1466</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><subject><json:item><value>Economics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Agricultural/environmental economics</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Agricultural Finance Review</title><doi><json:string>10.1108/afr</json:string></doi></host><categories><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string><json:string>prehistoire et protohistoire</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1108/00215080380001149</json:string></doi><id>B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14</id><score>0.052043736</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><availability><p>© MCB UP Limited</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Charles B.</forename><surname>Dodson</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Steven R.</forename><surname>Koenig</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Agricultural Finance Review</title><idno type="pISSN">0002-1466</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/afr</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2003-11-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="193">193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="212">212</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/00215080380001149</idno><idno type="filenameID">4210630206</idno><idno type="original-pdf">4210630206.pdf</idno><idno type="href">00215080380001149.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. Countylevel estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency FSA farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer privatesector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Credit rationing</term></item><item><term>Farm loan guarantees</term></item><item><term>Farm Service Agency</term></item><item><term>Federal farm credit programs</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Emerald Subject Group"><list><label>cat-ECO</label><label>cat-AFP</label><item><term>Economics</term></item><item><term>Agricultural/environmental economics</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-11-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-18">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus emerald not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><!-- Auto generated NISO JATS XML created by Atypon out of MCB DTD source files. Do Not Edit! --><article dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="review-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">afr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1108/afr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Finance Review</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0002-1466</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MCB UP Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/00215080380001149</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="original-pdf">4210630206.pdf</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="filename">4210630206</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="type-of-publication"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">review-article</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">General review</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="subject"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-ECO</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Economics</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-AFP</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Agricultural/environmental economics</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Explaining county‐level variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Charles B.</given-names> <surname>Dodson</surname></string-name></contrib><x></x><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Steven R.</given-names> <surname>Koenig</surname></string-name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2003</year></pub-date><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© MCB UP Limited</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2003</copyright-year><license license-type="publisher"><license-p></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="00215080380001149.pdf"></self-uri><abstract><p>USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. County‐level estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency (FSA) farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer private‐sector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Credit rationing</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>Farm loan guarantees</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>Farm Service Agency</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>Federal farm credit programs</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>peer-reviewed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>academic-content</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>rightslink</meta-name><meta-value>included</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Charles B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dodson</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Steven R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Koenig</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="review-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-11-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">USDA direct and guaranteed farm loan programs exhibit significant geographical variation in lending activity. Countylevel estimations made using Tobit procedures indicate that use of Farm Service Agency FSA farm loan programs is greater in counties with lower per capita income and regions experiencing greater farm financial stress. Use of direct FSA loan programs was lower in counties with fewer privatesector lenders. Guarantee loan program usage was found to decline when commercial agricultural lenders are absent from the county. FSA loan programs were more highly utilized in counties with an FSA loan service center and in states receiving greater FSA farm loan funding in past years.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Credit rationing</topic><topic>Farm loan guarantees</topic><topic>Farm Service Agency</topic><topic>Federal farm credit programs</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Agricultural Finance Review</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>Emerald Subject Group</genre><topic authority="SubjectCodesPrimary" authorityURI="cat-ECO">Economics</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-AFP">Agricultural/environmental economics</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0002-1466</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">afr</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/afr</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>63</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>193</start><end>212</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/00215080380001149</identifier><identifier type="filenameID">4210630206</identifier><identifier type="original-pdf">4210630206.pdf</identifier><identifier type="href">00215080380001149.pdf</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© MCB UP Limited</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>EMERALD</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001193 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001193 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B042D98F594A81B399A4B552B15082FA35AEEB14
|texte= Explaining countylevel variability in farm service agency farm loan programs
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |