COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE
Identifieur interne : 001188 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001187; suivant : 001189COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE
Auteurs : Daniel E. Line ; William A. Harman ; Gregory D. JenningsSource :
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association [ 1093-474X ] ; 1998-12.
English descriptors
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title><author><name sortKey="Line, Daniel E" sort="Line, Daniel E" uniqKey="Line D" first="Daniel E." last="Line">Daniel E. Line</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harman, William A" sort="Harman, William A" uniqKey="Harman W" first="William A." last="Harman">William A. Harman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jennings, Gregory D" sort="Jennings, Gregory D" uniqKey="Jennings G" first="Gregory D." last="Jennings">Gregory D. Jennings</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001188</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001188</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title><author><name sortKey="Line, Daniel E" sort="Line, Daniel E" uniqKey="Line D" first="Daniel E." last="Line">Daniel E. Line</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harman, William A" sort="Harman, William A" uniqKey="Harman W" first="William A." last="Harman">William A. Harman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jennings, Gregory D" sort="Jennings, Gregory D" uniqKey="Jennings G" first="Gregory D." last="Jennings">Gregory D. Jennings</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-12">1998-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1265">1265</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1273">1273</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></series><idno type="istex">77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR1265</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>monitoring</term><term>monitoring schemes</term><term>nonpoint source pollution</term><term>statistics</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT: Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Daniel E. Line</name></json:item><json:item><name>William A. Harman</name></json:item><json:item><name>Gregory D. Jennings</name></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nonpoint source pollution</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>monitoring</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>statistics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>monitoring schemes</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JAWR1265</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT: Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.248</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>591.36 x 788.64 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1676</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4784</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30339</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>247</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>34</volume><publisherId><json:string>JAWR</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>1273</last><first>1265</first></pages><issn><json:string>1093-474X</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1752-1688</json:string></eissn><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>water resources</json:string><json:string>geosciences, multidisciplinary</json:string><json:string>engineering, environmental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>engineering</json:string><json:string>environmental engineering</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</json:string></doi><id>77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D</id><score>0.039758805</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1998</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">*Paper No. 98049 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.Discussions are open until August 1, 1999.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel E.</forename><surname>Line</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">William A.</forename><surname>Harman</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Gregory D.</forename><surname>Jennings</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="pISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1265">1265</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1273">1273</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR1265</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1998</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>ABSTRACT: Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>nonpoint source pollution</term></item><item><term>monitoring</term></item><item><term>statistics</term></item><item><term>monitoring schemes</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998-12">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</doi><issn type="print">1093-474X</issn><issn type="electronic">1752-1688</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JAWR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jawr.1998.34.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="34">34</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1998-12">December 1998</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0126500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JAWR1265"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1265">1265</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1273">1273</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAWR.JAWR1265.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="14"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE<link href="#fn1"><sup>1</sup></link></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>Daniel E.</givenNames><familyName>Line</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>William A.</givenNames><familyName>Harman</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" noteRef="#fn2"><personName><givenNames>Gregory D.</givenNames><familyName>Jennings</familyName></personName></creator></creators><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">nonpoint source pollution</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">monitoring</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">statistics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">monitoring schemes</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>ABSTRACT: </b> Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><label>1</label><p>Paper No. 98049 of the <i>Journal of the American Water Resources Association.</i><b>Discussions are open until August 1, 1999.</b></p></note><note xml:id="fn2"><label>2</label><p>Extension Specialists, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7637, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7637 (E‐Mail/Line: <email>danline@ncsu.edu</email>).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE1</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Line</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">William A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Harman</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gregory D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Jennings</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">14</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT: Dairy cow pastures and feeding areas around barns can be a significant source of nonpoint source pollutants to nearby streams. To help document the significance of these sources, nutrient export in streamfiow from a 56.7‐ha, mostly agricultural, watershed located in southwestern North Carolina was monitored from August 1994 to January 1996. Total nitrogen and phosphorus export rates from the upper, predominantly pasture, part of the watershed were 18.0 and 1.4 kg/ha/yr, respectively, as measured by weekly grab sampling and 18.7 and 4.9 kg/halyr, respectively, as measured from storm event monitoring. Nitrogen and phosphorus export rates for the area between the monitoring sites, which included overgrazed cow holding and feeding areas and farm buildings, were 376 and 86 kgfhalyr, respectively, for grab sampling and 351 and 160 kg/ha/yr, respectively, for storm event monitoring. To estimate the amount of reduction from nonpoint source controls necessary to effect a significant reduction in pollutant loading, statistical analyses of the load data were conducted. The analyses for the five pollutants monitored showed that total suspended solids would require the greatest reduction (34.6 percent for weekly grab and 33.6 percent for storm) in loading after the implementation of controls for statistical significance. Nitrate plus nitrite was found to require the least reduction (12.6 percent for weekly grab). Pollutant export rates computed from weekly grab samples and storm event samples used separately were compared to corresponding export rates computed from combining grab and storm event samples to assess the differences in monitoring schemes.</abstract><note type="content">*Paper No. 98049 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.Discussions are open until August 1, 1999.</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>statistics</topic><topic>monitoring schemes</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1093-474X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAWR</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>34</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1265</start><end>1273</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05430.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JAWR1265</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001188 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001188 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:77DF7EC51BEF405121D1BDF2C917A12B96AA322D
|texte= COMPARING SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR MONITORING POLLUTANT EXPORT FROM A DAIRY PASTURE
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |