Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition
Identifieur interne : 001072 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001071; suivant : 001073Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition
Auteurs : Lars A. Brudvig ; Ellen I. DamschenSource :
- Ecography [ 0906-7590 ] ; 2011-04.
Abstract
Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine Pinus palustris woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title><author><name sortKey="Brudvig, Lars A" sort="Brudvig, Lars A" uniqKey="Brudvig L" first="Lars A." last="Brudvig">Lars A. Brudvig</name></author><author><name sortKey="Damschen, Ellen I" sort="Damschen, Ellen I" uniqKey="Damschen E" first="Ellen I." last="Damschen">Ellen I. Damschen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001072</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001072</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title><author><name sortKey="Brudvig, Lars A" sort="Brudvig, Lars A" uniqKey="Brudvig L" first="Lars A." last="Brudvig">Lars A. Brudvig</name></author><author><name sortKey="Damschen, Ellen I" sort="Damschen, Ellen I" uniqKey="Damschen E" first="Ellen I." last="Damschen">Ellen I. Damschen</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-04">2011-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="257">257</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="266">266</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></series><idno type="istex">FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG6381</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine Pinus palustris woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Lars A. Brudvig</name></json:item><json:item><name>Ellen I. Damschen</name></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>ECOG6381</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine Pinus palustris woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2042</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6344</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>42771</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>269</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>34</volume><publisherId><json:string>ECOG</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>266</last><first>257</first></pages><issn><json:string>0906-7590</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1600-0587</json:string></eissn><title>Ecography</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>biodiversity conservation</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</json:string></doi><id>FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA</id><score>0.04042069</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 The Authors</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Lars A.</forename><surname>Brudvig</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Ellen I.</forename><surname>Damschen</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="pISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="257">257</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="266">266</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG6381</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine Pinus palustris woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-04">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</doi><issn type="print">0906-7590</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0587</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ECOG"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ECOGRAPHY">Ecography</title><title type="short">Ecography</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ecog.2011.34.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="34">34</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-04">April 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ECOG6381"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 The Authors</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.8 mode:FullText" date="2011-04-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-08-13"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-08-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-04-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="257">257</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="266">266</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>L. A. Brudvig (<email>brudvig@msu.edu</email>), Michigan State Univ., Plant Biology Dept, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, and Washington Univ., Dept of Biology, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. – E. I. Damschen, Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Dept of Zoology, Madison, WI 53706, USA.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ECOG.ECOG6381.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Manuscript Accepted 30 April 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="47"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>Lars A.</givenNames><familyName>Brudvig</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>Ellen I.</givenNames><familyName>Damschen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine <i>Pinus palustris</i> woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Brudvig</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ellen I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Damschen</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-04</dateIssued><edition>Manuscript Accepted 30 April 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">47</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Restoration and management activities targeted at recovering biodiversity can lead to unexpected results. In part, this is due to a lack of understanding of how site‐level characteristics, landscape factors, and land‐use history interact with restoration and management practices to determine patterns of diversity. For plants, such factors may be particularly important since plant populations often exhibit lagged responses to habitat loss and degradation. Here, we assess the importance of site‐level, landscape, and historical effects for understory plant species richness and composition across a set of 40 longleaf pine Pinus palustris woodlands undergoing restoration for the federally endangered red‐cockaded woodpecker in the southeastern United States. Land‐use history had an overarching effect on richness and composition. Relative to historically forested sites, sites with agricultural histories (i.e. former pastures or cultivated fields) supported lower species richness and an altered species composition due to fewer upland longleaf pine woodland community members. Landscape effects did not influence the total number of species in either historically forested or post‐agricultural sites; however, understory species composition was affected by historical connectivity, but only for post‐agricultural sites. The influences of management and restoration activities were only apparent once land‐use history was accounted for. Prescribed burning and mechanical overstory thinning were key drivers of understory composition and promoted understory richness in post‐agricultural sites. In historically forested sites these activities had no impact on richness and only prescribed fire influenced composition. Our findings reveal complex interplays between site‐level, landscape, and historical effects, suggest fundamentally different controls over plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands with varying land‐use history, and underscore the importance of considering land‐use history and landscape effects during restoration.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0906-7590</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ECOG</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>34</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>257</start><end>266</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06381.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ECOG6381</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Authors</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001072 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001072 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FF57648911A1F888949F806BD7B9BDAF67D1A9DA
|texte= Land‐use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |