Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems
Identifieur interne : 000F65 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000F64; suivant : 000F66Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems
Auteurs : Steven Wolf ; David Just ; David ZilbermanSource :
- Research Policy [ 0048-7333 ] ; 2001.
Abstract
In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Steven" sort="Wolf, Steven" uniqKey="Wolf S" first="Steven" last="Wolf">Steven Wolf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Just, David" sort="Just, David" uniqKey="Just D" first="David" last="Just">David Just</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zilberman, David" sort="Zilberman, David" uniqKey="Zilberman D" first="David" last="Zilberman">David Zilberman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F65</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F65</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Steven" sort="Wolf, Steven" uniqKey="Wolf S" first="Steven" last="Wolf">Steven Wolf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Just, David" sort="Just, David" uniqKey="Just D" first="David" last="Just">David Just</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zilberman, David" sort="Zilberman, David" uniqKey="Zilberman D" first="David" last="Zilberman">David Zilberman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Research Policy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">RESPOL</title><idno type="ISSN">0048-7333</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2001">2001</date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="121">121</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="141">141</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0048-7333</idno></series><idno type="istex">53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</idno><idno type="PII">S0048-7333(99)00096-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0048-7333</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Steven Wolf</name><affiliations><json:string>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>David Just</name><affiliations><json:string>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>David Zilberman</name><affiliations><json:string>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Agricultural economics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Decision support</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Information system</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Information accounting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Public sector research and extension</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Analytic competency</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>540 x 712 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1953</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10565</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>72779</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>21</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>256</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title><pii><json:string>S0048-7333(99)00096-7</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>30</volume><pii><json:string>S0048-7333(00)X0046-7</json:string></pii><pages><last>141</last><first>121</first></pages><issn><json:string>0048-7333</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Research Policy</title><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>planning & development</json:string><json:string>management</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>science studies</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</json:string></doi><id>53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884</id><score>0.043075185</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</p></availability><date>2001</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Fig. 1: Model of information generation.</note><note type="content">Fig. 2: Plot of percentage data imported versus percentage information exported by selected intermediaries.</note><note type="content">Table 1: Education and data and information inputs of endusers and intermediaries</note><note type="content">Table 2: Data and information outputs of intermediaries</note><note type="content">Table 3: Endusers' sources of information by topic</note><note type="content">Table 4: Intermediaries' sources of information by topic</note><note type="content">Table 5: Indirect USDA contributions in information systems and estimate of total public contribution to information resources</note><note type="content">Table 6: Value of information</note><note type="content">Table 7: Attitudes in information networks of endusers and intermediaries Five-point Likert scores (+2=strongly agree; +1=agree; 0=neither agree nor disagree; −1=disagree; −2=strongly disagree). Respondent codes: (a) wheat farmers; (b) wheat elevators; (c) wheat exporters; (d) potato grower/packer/shippers; (e) potato processors; (f) hog farmers; (g) hog processors; (h) hog input suppliers; (i) tomato growers; (j) tomato grower/packer/shippers; (k) tomato input suppliers; (l) bankers; (m) misc. enduser.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Steven</forename><surname>Wolf</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Corresponding author. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 207 Giannini Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Tel.: +1-510-642-6570; fax: +1-510-643-8911</p></note><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">David</forename><surname>Just</surname></persName><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">David</forename><surname>Zilberman</surname></persName><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Research Policy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">RESPOL</title><idno type="pISSN">0048-7333</idno><idno type="PII">S0048-7333(00)X0046-7</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2001"></date><biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="121">121</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="141">141</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</idno><idno type="PII">S0048-7333(99)00096-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2001</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Agricultural economics</term></item><item><term>Decision support</term></item><item><term>Information system</term></item><item><term>Information accounting</term></item><item><term>Public sector research and extension</term></item><item><term>Analytic competency</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2001">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr1" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr1"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr2" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr2"></istex:entity></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>RESPOL</jid><aid>1186</aid><ce:pii>S0048-7333(99)00096-7</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</ce:doi><ce:copyright year="2001" type="full-transfer">Elsevier Science B.V.</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Steven</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Wolf</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">a</ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">b</ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="CORR1">*</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>David</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Just</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">a</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>David</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zilberman</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">a</ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3">c</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité d'Économie et Sociologique Rurales, Toulouse, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF3"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:textfn>Member, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="CORR1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text>Corresponding author. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 207 Giannini Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Tel.: +1-510-642-6570; fax: +1-510-643-8911</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-accepted day="24" month="9" year="1999"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword"><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Agricultural economics</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Decision support</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Information system</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Information accounting</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Public sector research and extension</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Analytic competency</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Steven</namePart><namePart type="family">Wolf</namePart><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation><description>Corresponding author. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 207 Giannini Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Tel.: +1-510-642-6570; fax: +1-510-643-8911</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David</namePart><namePart type="family">Just</namePart><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David</namePart><namePart type="family">Zilberman</namePart><affiliation>University of California, Berkeley Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce and reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public investments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutional complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic information is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate the centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economic advisory services through development of an information accounting framework. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination in the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information systems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of actors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agricultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse range of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization functions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspect of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innovation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating functions in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make important contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility, there are likely to be limitations to substitutability based on the classic (but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in information.</abstract><note type="content">Fig. 1: Model of information generation.</note><note type="content">Fig. 2: Plot of percentage data imported versus percentage information exported by selected intermediaries.</note><note type="content">Table 1: Education and data and information inputs of endusers and intermediaries</note><note type="content">Table 2: Data and information outputs of intermediaries</note><note type="content">Table 3: Endusers' sources of information by topic</note><note type="content">Table 4: Intermediaries' sources of information by topic</note><note type="content">Table 5: Indirect USDA contributions in information systems and estimate of total public contribution to information resources</note><note type="content">Table 6: Value of information</note><note type="content">Table 7: Attitudes in information networks of endusers and intermediaries Five-point Likert scores (+2=strongly agree; +1=agree; 0=neither agree nor disagree; −1=disagree; −2=strongly disagree). Respondent codes: (a) wheat farmers; (b) wheat elevators; (c) wheat exporters; (d) potato grower/packer/shippers; (e) potato processors; (f) hog farmers; (g) hog processors; (h) hog input suppliers; (i) tomato growers; (j) tomato grower/packer/shippers; (k) tomato input suppliers; (l) bankers; (m) misc. enduser.</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Decision support</topic><topic>Information system</topic><topic>Information accounting</topic><topic>Public sector research and extension</topic><topic>Analytic competency</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Research Policy</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>RESPOL</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200101</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0048-7333</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0048-7333(00)X0046-7</identifier><part><date>200101</date><detail type="volume"><number>30</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>1</start><end>178</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>121</start><end>141</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0048-7333(99)00096-7</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Elsevier Science B.V., ©2001</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F65 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F65 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:53C1843CA104692DE95D2EB1E498A1F525EDC884
|texte= Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |