Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities
Identifieur interne : 000D68 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000D67; suivant : 000D69Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities
Auteurs : Aurélien Jamoneau ; Olivier Chabrerie ; Déborah Closset-Kopp ; Guillaume DecocqSource :
- Ecography [ 0906-7590 ] ; 2012-02.
Abstract
The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title><author><name sortKey="Jamoneau, Aurelien" sort="Jamoneau, Aurelien" uniqKey="Jamoneau A" first="Aurélien" last="Jamoneau">Aurélien Jamoneau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chabrerie, Olivier" sort="Chabrerie, Olivier" uniqKey="Chabrerie O" first="Olivier" last="Chabrerie">Olivier Chabrerie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Closset Opp, Deborah" sort="Closset Opp, Deborah" uniqKey="Closset Opp D" first="Déborah" last="Closset-Kopp">Déborah Closset-Kopp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Decocq, Guillaume" sort="Decocq, Guillaume" uniqKey="Decocq G" first="Guillaume" last="Decocq">Guillaume Decocq</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D68</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D68</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title><author><name sortKey="Jamoneau, Aurelien" sort="Jamoneau, Aurelien" uniqKey="Jamoneau A" first="Aurélien" last="Jamoneau">Aurélien Jamoneau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chabrerie, Olivier" sort="Chabrerie, Olivier" uniqKey="Chabrerie O" first="Olivier" last="Chabrerie">Olivier Chabrerie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Closset Opp, Deborah" sort="Closset Opp, Deborah" uniqKey="Closset Opp D" first="Déborah" last="Closset-Kopp">Déborah Closset-Kopp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Decocq, Guillaume" sort="Decocq, Guillaume" uniqKey="Decocq G" first="Guillaume" last="Decocq">Guillaume Decocq</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="133">133</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></series><idno type="istex">9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG6900</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Aurélien Jamoneau</name><affiliations><json:string>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Olivier Chabrerie</name><affiliations><json:string>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Déborah Closset‐Kopp</name><affiliations><json:string>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Guillaume Decocq</name><affiliations><json:string>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>ECOG6900</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.952</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1853</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6915</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>45102</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>246</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>35</volume><publisherId><json:string>ECOG</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>133</last><first>124</first></pages><issn><json:string>0906-7590</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1600-0587</json:string></eissn><title>Ecography</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>biodiversity conservation</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</json:string></doi><id>9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1</id><score>0.041057356</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 The Authors</p></availability><date>2012</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Aurélien</forename><surname>Jamoneau</surname></persName><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Olivier</forename><surname>Chabrerie</surname></persName><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Déborah</forename><surname>Closset‐Kopp</surname></persName><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Guillaume</forename><surname>Decocq</surname></persName><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="pISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="133">133</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG6900</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2012</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2012-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</doi><issn type="print">0906-7590</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0587</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ECOG"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ECOGRAPHY">Ecography</title><title type="short">Ecography</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ecog.2012.35.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="35">35</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ECOG6900"></id><id type="supplier" value="ecog6900"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 The Authors</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-05-02"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-05-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-05-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="124">124</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="133">133</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>G. Decocq, Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité“Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés” (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France. E‐mail: <email normalForm="guillaume.decocq@u-picardie.fr">guillaume.decocq@u‐picardie.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ECOG.ECOG6900.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Paper manuscript accepted 1 April 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="56"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Aurélien</givenNames><familyName>Jamoneau</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Olivier</givenNames><familyName>Chabrerie</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Déborah</givenNames><familyName>Closset‐Kopp</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Guillaume</givenNames><familyName>Decocq</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Aurélien</namePart><namePart type="family">Jamoneau</namePart><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Olivier</namePart><namePart type="family">Chabrerie</namePart><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Déborah</namePart><namePart type="family">Closset‐Kopp</namePart><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Guillaume</namePart><namePart type="family">Decocq</namePart><affiliation>Univ. de Picardie Jules Verne – Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthropisés (JE 2532 DSA), Plant Biodiversity Lab, 1, rue des Louvels, FR‐80037 Amiens Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued><edition>Paper manuscript accepted 1 April 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">1</extent><extent unit="references">56</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors in controlling the spatial patterns of plant species distribution is still poorly known and challenging for conservation ecology. We conducted an empirical study to link the spatial variation of species and environments among forest patches embedded in contrasted agricultural matrices. We compared how forest herb communities responded to spatial environmental gradients and past forest cover. We found low values of β‐diversity in both unfragmented and highly fragmented systems, independently from local and regional diversities. As fragmentation increased, the spatial structure of local plant communities was more complex and spatial effects explained an increasing proportion of β‐diversity, suggesting that the importance of dispersal limitations increased and played out at broad spatial scales. However, where spatio‐temporal isolation of forest patches was the highest, local species assemblages could not be explained, suggesting that the metacommunity functioning was disrupted. Where the historical continuity was high, local environmental characteristics explained a significant amount of species assemblages within metacommunities, suggesting habitat‐selection processes. Beta‐diversity and variations in presence–absence of species were also influenced by the intensity of landscape management, via the permeability of both forest edges and the matrix. This spatially‐explicit analysis of metacommunities revealed that forest fragmentation impacts beta‐diversity by altering not only the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes, but also the spatial scales at which they act. These results provide empirical support for the conservation of ancient forests and the maintenance of a high connectedness between fragments within agricultural landscapes.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0906-7590</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ECOG</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>35</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>124</start><end>133</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06900.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ECOG6900</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Authors</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D68 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D68 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9437D7F99DC53609DAA095DAF48D8C8D91EE5EB1
|texte= Fragmentation alters beta‐diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |