HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT
Identifieur interne : 000D00 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C99; suivant : 000D01HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT
Auteurs : Jaswinder Singh ; H. Vernon. Knapp ; J. G. Arnold ; Misganaw DemissieSource :
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association [ 1093-474X ] ; 2005-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km2 Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title><author><name sortKey="Singh, Jaswinder" sort="Singh, Jaswinder" uniqKey="Singh J" first="Jaswinder" last="Singh">Jaswinder Singh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knapp, H Vernon" sort="Knapp, H Vernon" uniqKey="Knapp H" first="H. Vernon." last="Knapp">H. Vernon. Knapp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arnold, J G" sort="Arnold, J G" uniqKey="Arnold J" first="J. G." last="Arnold">J. G. Arnold</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Demissie, Misganaw" sort="Demissie, Misganaw" uniqKey="Demissie M" first="Misganaw" last="Demissie">Misganaw Demissie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D00</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D00</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title><author><name sortKey="Singh, Jaswinder" sort="Singh, Jaswinder" uniqKey="Singh J" first="Jaswinder" last="Singh">Jaswinder Singh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knapp, H Vernon" sort="Knapp, H Vernon" uniqKey="Knapp H" first="H. Vernon." last="Knapp">H. Vernon. Knapp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arnold, J G" sort="Arnold, J G" uniqKey="Arnold J" first="J. G." last="Arnold">J. G. Arnold</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Demissie, Misganaw" sort="Demissie, Misganaw" uniqKey="Demissie M" first="Misganaw" last="Demissie">Misganaw Demissie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-04">2005-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="343">343</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="360">360</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></series><idno type="istex">ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR343</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1093-474X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>agriculture</term><term>hydrologic cycle</term><term>modeling</term><term>nonpoint source pollution</term><term>surface water</term><term>watershed management</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT: The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km2 Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Jaswinder Singh</name><affiliations><json:string>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. Vernon. Knapp</name><affiliations><json:string>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J.G. Arnold</name><affiliations><json:string>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Misganaw Demissie</name><affiliations><json:string>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>watershed management</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>hydrologic cycle</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nonpoint source pollution</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surface water</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>modeling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>agriculture</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JAWR343</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT: The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km2 Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.844</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1592</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7323</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46012</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>237</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>41</volume><publisherId><json:string>JAWR</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>18</total><last>360</last><first>343</first></pages><issn><json:string>1093-474X</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1752-1688</json:string></eissn><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>water resources</json:string><json:string>geosciences, multidisciplinary</json:string><json:string>engineering, environmental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>engineering</json:string><json:string>environmental engineering</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</json:string></doi><id>ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4</id><score>0.041057356</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2005</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">*Paper No. 04030 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) (Copyright © 2005). Discussions are open until October 1, 2005.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Jaswinder</forename><surname>Singh</surname></persName><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">H. Vernon.</forename><surname>Knapp</surname></persName><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">J.G.</forename><surname>Arnold</surname></persName><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Misganaw</forename><surname>Demissie</surname></persName><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><idno type="pISSN">1093-474X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-1688</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="343">343</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="360">360</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAWR343</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2005</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>ABSTRACT: The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km2 Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>watershed management</term></item><item><term>hydrologic cycle</term></item><item><term>nonpoint source pollution</term></item><item><term>surface water</term></item><item><term>modeling</term></item><item><term>agriculture</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2005-04">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</doi><issn type="print">1093-474X</issn><issn type="electronic">1752-1688</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JAWR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION">JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jawr.2005.41.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="41">41</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-04">April 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0034300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JAWR343"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="18"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="343">343</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="360">360</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAWR.JAWR343.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT<link href="#fn1"><sup>1</sup></link></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Jaswinder</givenNames><familyName>Singh</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>H. Vernon.</givenNames><familyName>Knapp</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>J.G.</givenNames><familyName>Arnold</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Misganaw</givenNames><familyName>Demissie</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation> Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: <email>jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu</email>).</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">watershed management</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">hydrologic cycle</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">nonpoint source pollution</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">surface water</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">modeling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">agriculture</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>ABSTRACT: </b> The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km<sup>2</sup> Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><label>1</label><p>Paper No. 04030 of the <i>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</i> (JAWRA) (Copyright © 2005). <b>Discussions are open until October 1, 2005.</b></p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT1</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jaswinder</namePart><namePart type="family">Singh</namePart><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H. Vernon.</namePart><namePart type="family">Knapp</namePart><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Arnold</namePart><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Misganaw</namePart><namePart type="family">Demissie</namePart><affiliation>Respectively, Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, 1320 SW Monarch Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602; Senior Hydrologist, ülinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820; Agricultural Engineer, USDA‐ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; and Director, Center for Watershed Science, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 (E‐Mail/Singh: jsingh@sws.uiuc.edu).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">34</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT: The performance of two popular watershed scale simulation models — HSPF and SWAT — were evaluated for simulating the hydrology of the 5,568 km2 Iroquois River watershed in Illinois and Indiana. This large, tile drained agricultural watershed provides distinctly different conditions for model comparison in contrast to previous studies. Both models were calibrated for a nine‐year period (1987 through 1995) and verified using an independent 15‐year period (1972 through 1986) by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly, and annual streamflow. The characteristics of simulated flows from both models are mostly similar to each other and to observed flows, particularly for the calibration results. SWAT predicts flows slightly better than HSPF for the verification period, with the primary advantage being better simulation of low flows. A noticeable difference in the models' hydrologic simulation relates to the estimation of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Comparatively low PET values provided as input to HSPF from the BASINS 3.0 database may be a factor in HSPF's overestimation of low flows. Another factor affecting baseflow simulation is the presence of tile drains in the watershed. HSPF parameters can be adjusted to indirectly account for the faster subsurface flow associated with tile drains, but there is no specific tile drainage component in HSPF as there is in SWAT. Continued comparative studies such as this, under a variety of hydrologic conditions and watershed scales, provide needed guidance to potential users in model selection and application.</abstract><note type="content">*Paper No. 04030 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) (Copyright © 2005). Discussions are open until October 1, 2005.</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>watershed management</topic><topic>hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>surface water</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>agriculture</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1093-474X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-1688</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAWR</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>41</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>343</start><end>360</end><total>18</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JAWR343</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D00 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D00 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:ED6759455D40DDCD6A92B0C9BE802104611AEEB4
|texte= HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |