Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture
Identifieur interne : 000C64 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C63; suivant : 000C65Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture
Auteurs : A. Dinar ; A. XepapadeasSource :
- Journal of Environmental Management [ 0301-4797 ] ; 1998.
English descriptors
Abstract
This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.1998 Academic Press
Url:
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1998.0237
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title><author><name sortKey="Dinar, A" sort="Dinar, A" uniqKey="Dinar A" first="A." last="Dinar">A. Dinar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Xepapadeas, A" sort="Xepapadeas, A" uniqKey="Xepapadeas A" first="A." last="Xepapadeas">A. Xepapadeas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1006/jema.1998.0237</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C64</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C64</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title><author><name sortKey="Dinar, A" sort="Dinar, A" uniqKey="Dinar A" first="A." last="Dinar">A. Dinar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Xepapadeas, A" sort="Xepapadeas, A" uniqKey="Xepapadeas A" first="A." last="Xepapadeas">A. Xepapadeas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Environmental Management</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJEMA</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-4797</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1998">1998</date><biblScope unit="volume">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="289">289</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-4797</idno></series><idno type="istex">7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/jema.1998.0237</idno><idno type="PII">S0301-4797(98)90237-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-4797</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>regulation, water quality, water quantity, information, irrigation.</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.1998 Academic Press</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>A. Dinar</name><affiliations><json:string>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Xepapadeas</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>regulation, water quality, water quantity, information, irrigation.</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.1998 Academic Press</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.784</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1535</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7539</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>48491</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>232</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title><pii><json:string>S0301-4797(98)90237-7</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>54</volume><pii><json:string>S0301-4797(00)X0026-6</json:string></pii><pages><last>289</last><first>273</first></pages><issn><json:string>0301-4797</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>environmental sciences</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>earth & environmental sciences</json:string><json:string>environmental sciences</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1006/jema.1998.0237</json:string></doi><id>7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632</id><score>0.04067297</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1998 Academic Press</p></availability><date>1998</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Dinar</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Corresponding author</p></note><affiliation>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Xepapadeas</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Environmental Management</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJEMA</title><idno type="pISSN">0301-4797</idno><idno type="PII">S0301-4797(00)X0026-6</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1998"></date><biblScope unit="volume">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="289">289</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/jema.1998.0237</idno><idno type="PII">S0301-4797(98)90237-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1998</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.1998 Academic Press</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>regulation, water quality, water quantity, information, irrigation.</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-11-19">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-13">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-16">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier converted-article found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla" xml:lang="en"><item-info><jid>YJEMA</jid><aid>90237</aid><ce:pii>S0301-4797(98)90237-7</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1006/jema.1998.0237</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="1998">Academic Press</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Regular Article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Dinar</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="EV980237A1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="EV980237FN1"><ce:sup>f1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Xepapadeas</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="EV980237A2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="EV980237A1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="EV980237A2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:footnote id="EV980237FN1"><ce:label>f1</ce:label><ce:note-para>Corresponding author</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="23" month="1" year="1997"></ce:date-received><ce:date-accepted day="25" month="8" year="1998"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.<ce:italic>1998 Academic Press</ce:italic></ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>regulation, water quality, water quantity, information, irrigation.</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dinar</namePart><affiliation>Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, 20433, DC, USA</affiliation><description>Corresponding author</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Xepapadeas</namePart><affiliation>Department of Economics, University of Crete, Retymno, 74100, Crete, Greece</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper largely applies the theoretical model formulated in an earlier paper by the authors, of an input based approach to control an agricultural non-point-source pollution. The empirical problem includes a groundwater aquifer being polluted by several agricultural producers. In order to prevent degradation of the quality and depletion of the quantity of the water in the aquifer, a regulatory agency must intervene. The regulatory agency does not have all the information needed for decision making. The producers» use of water from a surface supply is recorded and additional water is pumped from the ground aquifer, the amount of which is unknown to the agency. The agency also does not know the physical characteristics of the production process that is factored into the pollution process. The model evaluates two monitoring regimes (central and individual) and two regulatory tools (taxes and quotas) associated with each regime. Individual monitoring was found to be superior to central monitoring, both in terms of the physical characteristics of the problem (water quality and quantity) and in terms of regional income. For both the central and the individual monitoring regimes, the optimal paths of the state variables reach steady-state values relatively early, with values in the individual monitoring reaching the steady-state earlier than in the case of central monitoring. The optimal path of investment in monitoring equipment suggested investment in monitoring equipment as early as possible.1998 Academic Press</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>regulation, water quality, water quantity, information, irrigation.</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YJEMA</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199812</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0301-4797</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0301-4797(00)X0026-6</identifier><part><date>199812</date><detail type="volume"><number>54</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>259</start><end>334</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>273</start><end>289</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1006/jema.1998.0237</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0301-4797(98)90237-7</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1998 Academic Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Academic Press, ©1998</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C64 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C64 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7195F9907707FC8C95CD73F8492C01CEE52CE632
|texte= Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |