What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?
Identifieur interne : 000A69 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A68; suivant : 000A70What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?
Auteurs : Jeffrey A. McneelySource :
- Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society [ 0024-4074 ] ; 2011-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 233–239.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title><author><name sortKey="Mcneely, Jeffrey A" sort="Mcneely, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Mcneely J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Mcneely">Jeffrey A. Mcneely</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: JAM@iucn.org</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A69</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A69</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title><author><name sortKey="Mcneely, Jeffrey A" sort="Mcneely, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Mcneely J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Mcneely">Jeffrey A. Mcneely</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: JAM@iucn.org</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-4074</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8339</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-07">2011-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">166</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="233">233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="239">239</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0024-4074</idno></series><idno type="istex">ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BOJ1151</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0024-4074</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Convention on Biological Diversity</term><term>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</term><term>conservation</term><term>targets</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 233–239.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>JEFFREY A. MCNEELY</name><affiliations><json:string>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>E-mail: JAM@iucn.org</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>conservation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Convention on Biological Diversity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>targets</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>BOJ1151</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 233–239.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.453</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2261</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4453</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27776</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>357</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>166</volume><publisherId><json:string>BOJ</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>7</total><last>239</last><first>233</first></pages><issn><json:string>0024-4074</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1095-8339</json:string></eissn><title>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>plant sciences</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>evolutionary biology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</json:string></doi><id>ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6</id><score>0.0413298</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 The Linnean Society of London</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">JEFFREY A.</forename><surname>MCNEELY</surname></persName><email>JAM@iucn.org</email><affiliation>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="pISSN">0024-4074</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8339</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-07"></date><biblScope unit="volume">166</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="233">233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="239">239</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BOJ1151</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 233–239.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>conservation</term></item><item><term>Convention on Biological Diversity</term></item><item><term>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</term></item><item><term>targets</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-07">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339</doi><issn type="print">0024-4074</issn><issn type="electronic">1095-8339</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="BOJ"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY">Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/boj.2011.166.issue-3</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Science and development of government policy post‐<i>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</i>: lessons for the future</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="166">166</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-07">July 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="BOJ1151"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 The Linnean Society of London</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.5.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-06-23"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-06-23"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-06-23"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="233">233</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="239">239</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> E‐mail: <email>JAM@iucn.org</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BOJ.BOJ1151.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 26 August 2010; revised 1 November 2010; accepted for publication 15 April 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4803"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title><title type="shortAuthors">J. A. M<sc>c</sc> NEELY</title><title type="short">HELPING TO SAVE THE GREEN STUFF</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>JEFFREY A.</givenNames><familyName>MCNEELY</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">conservation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Convention on Biological Diversity</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3"><i>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</i></keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">targets</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The <i>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</i> (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, <i>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</i>, 2011, <b>166</b>, 233–239.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>HELPING TO SAVE THE GREEN STUFF</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">JEFFREY A.</namePart><namePart type="family">MCNEELY</namePart><affiliation>International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: JAM@iucn.org</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07</dateIssued><edition>Received 26 August 2010; revised 1 November 2010; accepted for publication 15 April 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">34</extent><extent unit="words">4803</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) was the first such effort under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and had gone through a 3‐year process to reach the level of maturity that enabled it to be approved by consensus by all Governments present at the key session in The Hague in April 2002. It provided a model for subsequent CBD workplans, with targets, and undoubtedly contributed to the 2010 target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss. In the event, few of the targets were achieved, because of numerous constraints at both policy and implementation levels. Even so, the GSPC stands as an important milestone in the global effort to conserve biodiversity. However, few plant scientists can be satisfied that the essential steps are being taken to ensure the conservation of plants, although, of course, plant scientists are only one part of the complex effort that will be required. This paper offers some suggestions that might be worth consideration, building on the basic principle in politics that a strong constituency is necessary to victory. In other words, although plant scientists play a crucial role, plant conservation is too important to leave in their hands alone; far broader support is required, including from the private sector, agriculture, forestry, trade, economics, tourism and even the military. Although botanical science provides a solid foundation, other branches of science are also important, ranging from anthropology to zoology. The legal profession also has important contributions to make (as well as the ability to hamper progress – for example through using issues such as access and benefit sharing to limit the exchange of genetic materials for even noncommercial use). 2010 was the United Nations Year of Biodiversity, and the GSPC targets reached their due date. It therefore seems timely to add some additional perspectives to the effort to update the GSPC. This paper suggests ways to reach a far broader constituency, provides tools to those who are expected to achieve the targets, and suggests ways to build a strong international constituency to conserve the world's botanical wealth. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 166, 233–239.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Convention on Biological Diversity</topic><topic>Global Strategy for Plant Conservation</topic><topic>targets</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0024-4074</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1095-8339</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">BOJ</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="title"><title>Science and development of government policy post‐Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: lessons for the future</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>166</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>233</start><end>239</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BOJ1151</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Linnean Society of London</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A69 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A69 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:ED26F628066721354A1C10AD3C96D6334A9899E6
|texte= What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |