Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth
Identifieur interne : 000811 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000810; suivant : 000812Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth
Auteurs : Dirgha J. Ghimire ; William G. AxinnSource :
- Rural Sociology [ 0036-0112 ] ; 2010-09.
Abstract
This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title><author><name sortKey="Ghimire, Dirgha J" sort="Ghimire, Dirgha J" uniqKey="Ghimire D" first="Dirgha J." last="Ghimire">Dirgha J. Ghimire</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Axinn, William G" sort="Axinn, William G" uniqKey="Axinn W" first="William G." last="Axinn">William G. Axinn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000811</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000811</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title><author><name sortKey="Ghimire, Dirgha J" sort="Ghimire, Dirgha J" uniqKey="Ghimire D" first="Dirgha J." last="Ghimire">Dirgha J. Ghimire</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Axinn, William G" sort="Axinn, William G" uniqKey="Axinn W" first="William G." last="Axinn">William G. Axinn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Rural Sociology</title><idno type="ISSN">0036-0112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1549-0831</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09">2010-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="478">478</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="513">513</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0036-0112</idno></series><idno type="istex">F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RUSO19</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0036-0112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Dirgha J. Ghimire</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>William G. Axinn</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>RUSO19</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.992</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>432 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1127</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>12885</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>87254</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>36</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>166</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>75</volume><publisherId><json:string>RUSO</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>36</total><last>513</last><first>478</first></pages><issn><json:string>0036-0112</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1549-0831</json:string></eissn><title>Rural Sociology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1549-0831</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>sociology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>sociology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</json:string></doi><id>F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85</id><score>0.038298264</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2010, by the Rural Sociological Society</p></availability><date>2010</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Dirgha J.</forename><surname>Ghimire</surname></persName><affiliation>Direct correspondence to Dirgha J. Ghimire at Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106‐1248, email: nepdjg@umich.edu. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01‐HD32912) and a grant from the Fogarty International Center to the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan. We would like to thank Arland Thornton for his helpful comments on previous drafts of this article and his contributions to the research reported here. We would also like to thank N. E. Barr, Cathy Sun, and Paul Schulz and the research staff at the Institute for Social and Environmental Research in Nepal.</affiliation><affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">William G.</forename><surname>Axinn</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Rural Sociology</title><idno type="pISSN">0036-0112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1549-0831</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1549-0831</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="478">478</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="513">513</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RUSO19</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2010</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1549-0831</doi><issn type="print">0036-0112</issn><issn type="electronic">1549-0831</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="RUSO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="RURAL SOCIOLOGY">Rural Sociology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ruso.2010.75.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="75">75</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-09">September 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="RUSO19"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="36"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>Copyright © 2010, by the Rural Sociological Society</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-05-26"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-05-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.25 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-11-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-09-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="478">478</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="513">513</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:RUSO.RUSO19.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="125"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="15173"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title><title type="shortAuthors">Ghimire and Axinn</title><title type="short">Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn9"><personName><givenNames>Dirgha J.</givenNames><familyName>Ghimire</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>William G.</givenNames><familyName>Axinn</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation> Institute for Social Research
University of Michigan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">A<sc>bstract</sc></title><p>This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn9"><p> Direct correspondence to Dirgha J. Ghimire at Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106‐1248, email: <email>nepdjg@umich.edu</email>. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01‐HD32912) and a grant from the Fogarty International Center to the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan. We would like to thank Arland Thornton for his helpful comments on previous drafts of this article and his contributions to the research reported here. We would also like to thank N. E. Barr, Cathy Sun, and Paul Schulz and the research staff at the Institute for Social and Environmental Research in Nepal.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Dirgha J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ghimire</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</affiliation><description>Direct correspondence to Dirgha J. Ghimire at Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106‐1248, email: nepdjg@umich.edu. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01‐HD32912) and a grant from the Fogarty International Center to the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan. We would like to thank Arland Thornton for his helpful comments on previous drafts of this article and his contributions to the research reported here. We would also like to thank N. E. Barr, Cathy Sun, and Paul Schulz and the research staff at the Institute for Social and Environmental Research in Nepal.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">William G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Axinn</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">125</extent><extent unit="words">15173</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article examines the influence of community context and land use on the monthly odds of first birth in a society in the midst of dramatic fertility transition. The theoretical framework guiding our work predicts that proximity to nonfamily services should delay first births by creating opportunities for competing nonfamily activities and spreading new ideas that change expectations about family life. On the other hand, living in agricultural settings that provide opportunities for higher returns to child labor should speed first births. We use a longitudinal, multilevel, mixed‐method data from the Nepalese Himalayas to test these predictions. The empirical results reveal that nonfamily services during childhood and during early adulthood both have important independent influences on the odds of first birth. Also, as predicted, a high density of agricultural land use affects the odds of first births in the opposite direction, speeding first births. This clear pattern of contrasting effects provides important new evidence of the contextual dynamics that produce watershed changes in postmarital birth timing.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Rural Sociology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0036-0112</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1549-0831</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1549-0831</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">RUSO</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>75</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>478</start><end>513</end><total>36</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">RUSO19</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2010, by the Rural Sociological Society</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000811 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000811 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F322B062CF7FCF2ABEDC78D422D8F16AF289BA85
|texte= Community Context, Land Use, and First Birth
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |