Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques
Identifieur interne : 000756 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000755; suivant : 000757Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques
Auteurs : D. N Tiwari ; R. Loof ; G. N PaudyalSource :
- Agricultural Systems [ 0308-521X ] ; 1999.
Abstract
The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title><author><name sortKey="Tiwari, D N" sort="Tiwari, D N" uniqKey="Tiwari D" first="D. N" last="Tiwari">D. N Tiwari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loof, R" sort="Loof, R" uniqKey="Loof R" first="R" last="Loof">R. Loof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paudyal, G N" sort="Paudyal, G N" uniqKey="Paudyal G" first="G. N" last="Paudyal">G. N Paudyal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000756</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000756</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title><author><name sortKey="Tiwari, D N" sort="Tiwari, D N" uniqKey="Tiwari D" first="D. N" last="Tiwari">D. N Tiwari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loof, R" sort="Loof, R" uniqKey="Loof R" first="R" last="Loof">R. Loof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paudyal, G N" sort="Paudyal, G N" uniqKey="Paudyal G" first="G. N" last="Paudyal">G. N Paudyal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Agricultural Systems</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">AGSY</title><idno type="ISSN">0308-521X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">60</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="99">99</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="112">112</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0308-521X</idno></series><idno type="istex">810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</idno><idno type="PII">S0308-521X(99)00021-9</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0308-521X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>D.N Tiwari</name><affiliations><json:string>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R Loof</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G.N Paudyal</name><affiliations><json:string>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Economic sustainability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Economic incentives</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Environmental–economic decision making</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Environmental sustainability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Multi-criteria analysis</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.908</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>546 x 745 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1277</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6234</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>41975</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>159</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title><pii><json:string>S0308-521X(99)00021-9</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>60</volume><pii><json:string>S0308-521X(00)X0051-0</json:string></pii><pages><last>112</last><first>99</first></pages><issn><json:string>0308-521X</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Agricultural Systems</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</json:string></doi><id>810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399</id><score>0.04200052</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</p></availability><date>1999</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Fig. 1: Conceptual framework for environmental–economic decision making using multi-criteria analysis.</note><note type="content">Fig. 2: Hierarchy of sustainability criteria.</note><note type="content">Fig. 3: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for sustainability criteria (farmers' viewpoint).</note><note type="content">Fig. 4: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for sustainability criteria (officials' viewpoint).</note><note type="content">Fig. 5: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for alternatives (farmers' viewpoint). A3, priority for upland crops in highly and moderately suitable areas; A2, priority for rice cultivation in highly and moderately suitable areas; A5, area allocation according to farmers' preferences; A7, rice cultivation in all areas; A4, transfer of low-resource areas for other uses; A1, continuation of present cropping practices; A6, reduction in water supply based on distance from the main canal.</note><note type="content">Fig. 6: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for alternatives (officials' viewpoint). A5, area allocation according to farmers' preferences; A3, priority for upland crops in highly and moderately suitable areas; A2, priority for rice cultivation in highly and moderately suitable areas; A7, rice cultivation in all areas; A4, transfer of low-resource areas for other uses; A1, continuation of present cropping practices; A6, reduction in water supply based on distance from the main canal.</note><note type="content">Table 1: Pay-off matrix: sustainability criteria versus alternative cropping patternsa</note><note type="content">Table 2: Vectors of maximum or best criterion values, minimum or worst values and four sets of criterion weightsa</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">D.N</forename><surname>Tiwari</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Corresponding author</p></note><affiliation>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">R</forename><surname>Loof</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">G.N</forename><surname>Paudyal</surname></persName><affiliation>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Agricultural Systems</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">AGSY</title><idno type="pISSN">0308-521X</idno><idno type="PII">S0308-521X(00)X0051-0</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999"></date><biblScope unit="volume">60</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="99">99</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="112">112</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</idno><idno type="PII">S0308-521X(99)00021-9</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1999</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Economic sustainability</term></item><item><term>Economic incentives</term></item><item><term>Environmental–economic decision making</term></item><item><term>Environmental sustainability</term></item><item><term>Multi-criteria analysis</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998-11-20">Modified</change><change when="1999">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr1" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr1"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr2" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr2"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr3" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr3"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr4" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr4"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr5" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr5"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr6" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr6"></istex:entity></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>AGSY</jid><aid>550</aid><ce:pii>S0308-521X(99)00021-9</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="1999">Elsevier Science Ltd</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>D.N</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Tiwari</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFFA"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="CORR1">*</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Loof</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFFB"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.N</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Paudyal</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFFC"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFFA"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFFB"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFFC"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:textfn>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="CORR1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text>Corresponding author</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="30" month="1" year="1998"></ce:date-received><ce:date-revised day="20" month="11" year="1998"></ce:date-revised><ce:date-accepted day="26" month="2" year="1999"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword"><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Economic sustainability</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Economic incentives</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Environmental–economic decision making</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Environmental sustainability</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Multi-criteria analysis</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.N</namePart><namePart type="family">Tiwari</namePart><affiliation>PO Box 12609, Kathmandu, Nepal</affiliation><description>Corresponding author</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R</namePart><namePart type="family">Loof</namePart><affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.N</namePart><namePart type="family">Paudyal</namePart><affiliation>Danish Hydraulic Institute, Gulshan Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999</dateIssued><dateModified encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-20</dateModified><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and economic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental–economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers', governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined.</abstract><note type="content">Fig. 1: Conceptual framework for environmental–economic decision making using multi-criteria analysis.</note><note type="content">Fig. 2: Hierarchy of sustainability criteria.</note><note type="content">Fig. 3: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for sustainability criteria (farmers' viewpoint).</note><note type="content">Fig. 4: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for sustainability criteria (officials' viewpoint).</note><note type="content">Fig. 5: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for alternatives (farmers' viewpoint). A3, priority for upland crops in highly and moderately suitable areas; A2, priority for rice cultivation in highly and moderately suitable areas; A5, area allocation according to farmers' preferences; A7, rice cultivation in all areas; A4, transfer of low-resource areas for other uses; A1, continuation of present cropping practices; A6, reduction in water supply based on distance from the main canal.</note><note type="content">Fig. 6: Analytical hierarchical process priorities for alternatives (officials' viewpoint). A5, area allocation according to farmers' preferences; A3, priority for upland crops in highly and moderately suitable areas; A2, priority for rice cultivation in highly and moderately suitable areas; A7, rice cultivation in all areas; A4, transfer of low-resource areas for other uses; A1, continuation of present cropping practices; A6, reduction in water supply based on distance from the main canal.</note><note type="content">Table 1: Pay-off matrix: sustainability criteria versus alternative cropping patternsa</note><note type="content">Table 2: Vectors of maximum or best criterion values, minimum or worst values and four sets of criterion weightsa</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Economic sustainability</topic><topic>Economic incentives</topic><topic>Environmental–economic decision making</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Multi-criteria analysis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Agricultural Systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>AGSY</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199905</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0308-521X</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0308-521X(00)X0051-0</identifier><part><date>199905</date><detail type="volume"><number>60</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>77</start><end>156</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>99</start><end>112</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0308-521X(99)00021-9</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Elsevier Science Ltd, ©1999</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000756 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000756 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:810309919FA267DD9143B686B16E5BC36D55D399
|texte= Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |