Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products
Identifieur interne : 000322 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000321; suivant : 000323Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products
Auteurs : Fumiko YamazakiSource :
- Food Policy [ 0306-9192 ] ; 1996.
Abstract
This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title><author><name sortKey="Yamazaki, Fumiko" sort="Yamazaki, Fumiko" uniqKey="Yamazaki F" first="Fumiko" last="Yamazaki">Fumiko Yamazaki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000322</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000322</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title><author><name sortKey="Yamazaki, Fumiko" sort="Yamazaki, Fumiko" uniqKey="Yamazaki F" first="Fumiko" last="Yamazaki">Fumiko Yamazaki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Food Policy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JFPO</title><idno type="ISSN">0306-9192</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996">1996</date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4–5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="409">409</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="417">417</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0306-9192</idno></series><idno type="istex">C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</idno><idno type="PII">0306-9192(96)00016-4</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0306-9192</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Fumiko Yamazaki</name><affiliations><json:string>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Uruguay Round</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>MFN tariff reduction</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>erosion of preferences</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>agricultural commodities</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.651</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>468 x 699 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>761</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4139</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>22763</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>126</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title><pii><json:string>0306-9192(96)00016-4</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Research Report 21</title></serie><host><volume>21</volume><pii><json:string>S0306-9192(00)X0008-5</json:string></pii><pages><last>417</last><first>409</first></pages><issn><json:string>0306-9192</json:string></issn><issue>4–5</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Food Policy</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>economics</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>nutrition & dietetics</json:string><json:string>food science & technology</json:string><json:string>agricultural economics & policy</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>economics & business </json:string><json:string>agricultural economics & policy</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</json:string></doi><id>C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8</id><score>0.04072149</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Part A: Assessment of the impact</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Fumiko</forename><surname>Yamazaki</surname></persName><affiliation>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Food Policy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JFPO</title><idno type="pISSN">0306-9192</idno><idno type="PII">S0306-9192(00)X0008-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996"></date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4–5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="409">409</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="417">417</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</idno><idno type="PII">0306-9192(96)00016-4</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Uruguay Round</term></item><item><term>MFN tariff reduction</term></item><item><term>erosion of preferences</term></item><item><term>agricultural commodities</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JFPO</jid><aid>96000164</aid><ce:pii>0306-9192(96)00016-4</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1996"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Part A: Assessment of the impact</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Fumiko</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Yamazaki</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Uruguay Round</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>MFN tariff reduction</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>erosion of preferences</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>agricultural commodities</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Fumiko</namePart><namePart type="family">Yamazaki</namePart><affiliation>Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper assesses the potential impact of the Uruguay Round on agricultural trade preferences. The potential value of such preferences given by the European Union, Japan and the United States is estimated at US$1.9 billion in 1992, one-third going to Africa, 40 per cent to Latin America and the Caribbean, and the rest mainly to developing countries of the Far East and Oceania. After the Uruguay Round reduction in Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates, the potential value of preferences is estimated to fall by around US$0.7 billion, of which Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Far East account for 26 per cent, 39 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively. On a commodity basis, the biggest losses are estimated for fruit and nuts, coffee and tea.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Part A: Assessment of the impact</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Uruguay Round</topic><topic>MFN tariff reduction</topic><topic>erosion of preferences</topic><topic>agricultural commodities</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Food Policy</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JFPO</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199609</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0306-9192</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0306-9192(00)X0008-5</identifier><part><date>199609</date><detail type="issue"><title>Implications of the Uruguay Round for Developing Countries</title></detail><detail type="volume"><number>21</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4–5</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>343</start><end>477</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>409</start><end>417</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0306-9192(96)00016-4</identifier><identifier type="PII">0306-9192(96)00016-4</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000322 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000322 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C11E4B0AB4CF77A05E13C6648F1144AD8B993DF8
|texte= Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |