Système d'information stratégique et agriculture (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial

Identifieur interne : 000C36 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000C35; suivant : 000C37

Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial

Auteurs : Robert F. Stallard

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB

Abstract

This paper examines the linkages between the carbon cycle and sedimentary processes on land. Available data suggest that sedimentation on land can bury vast quantities of organic carbon, roughly 1015 g C yr−1. To evaluate the relative roles of various classes of processes in the burial of carbon on land, terrestrial sedimentation was modeled as a series of 864 scenarios. Each scenario represents a unique choice of intensities for seven classes of processes and two different global wetland distributions. Comparison was made with presumed preagricultural conditions. The classes of processes were divided into two major component parts: clastic sedimentation of soil‐derived carbon and organic sedimentation of autochthonous carbon. For clastic sedimentation, masses of sediment were considered for burial as reservoir sediment, lake sediment, and combined colluvium, alluvium, and aeolian deposits. When the ensemble of models is examined, the human‐induced burial of 0.6‐1.5·1015 g yr−1 of carbon on land is entirely plausible. This sink reaches its maximum strength between 30° and 50° N. Paddy lands stand out as a type of land use that warrants future study, but the many faces of rice agriculture limit generalization. In an extreme scenario, paddy lands alone could be made to bury about 1·1015 g C yr−1. Arguing that terrestrial sedimentation processes could be much of the sink for the so called “missing carbon” is reasonable. Such a hypothesis, however, requires major redesign of how the carbon cycle is modeled. Unlike ecosystem processes that are amenable to satellite monitoring and parallel modeling, many aspects of terrestrial sedimentation are hidden from space.

Url:
DOI: 10.1029/98GB00741


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Stallard, Robert F" sort="Stallard, Robert F" uniqKey="Stallard R" first="Robert F." last="Stallard">Robert F. Stallard</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB</idno>
<date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1029/98GB00741</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001052</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001052</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000F87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000C36</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000C36</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Stallard, Robert F" sort="Stallard, Robert F" uniqKey="Stallard R" first="Robert F." last="Stallard">Robert F. Stallard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Global Biogeochemical Cycles</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Global Biogeochem. Cycles</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-6236</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1944-9224</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1998-06">1998-06</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="231">231</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="257">257</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-6236</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1029/98GB00741</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">98GB00741</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-6236</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">This paper examines the linkages between the carbon cycle and sedimentary processes on land. Available data suggest that sedimentation on land can bury vast quantities of organic carbon, roughly 1015 g C yr−1. To evaluate the relative roles of various classes of processes in the burial of carbon on land, terrestrial sedimentation was modeled as a series of 864 scenarios. Each scenario represents a unique choice of intensities for seven classes of processes and two different global wetland distributions. Comparison was made with presumed preagricultural conditions. The classes of processes were divided into two major component parts: clastic sedimentation of soil‐derived carbon and organic sedimentation of autochthonous carbon. For clastic sedimentation, masses of sediment were considered for burial as reservoir sediment, lake sediment, and combined colluvium, alluvium, and aeolian deposits. When the ensemble of models is examined, the human‐induced burial of 0.6‐1.5·1015 g yr−1 of carbon on land is entirely plausible. This sink reaches its maximum strength between 30° and 50° N. Paddy lands stand out as a type of land use that warrants future study, but the many faces of rice agriculture limit generalization. In an extreme scenario, paddy lands alone could be made to bury about 1·1015 g C yr−1. Arguing that terrestrial sedimentation processes could be much of the sink for the so called “missing carbon” is reasonable. Such a hypothesis, however, requires major redesign of how the carbon cycle is modeled. Unlike ecosystem processes that are amenable to satellite monitoring and parallel modeling, many aspects of terrestrial sedimentation are hidden from space.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Stallard, Robert F" sort="Stallard, Robert F" uniqKey="Stallard R" first="Robert F." last="Stallard">Robert F. Stallard</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C36 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000C36 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Agronomie
   |area=    SisAgriV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:C634706CE783A675B50442F5FADB0CF1A3F279EB
   |texte=   Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28.
Data generation: Wed Mar 29 00:06:34 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 12 12:44:16 2024