Semi‐automated GIS techniques for detecting floodplain earthworks
Identifieur interne : 000015 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000014; suivant : 000016Semi‐automated GIS techniques for detecting floodplain earthworks
Auteurs : Celine M. M. Steinfeld [Australie] ; Richard T. Kingsford [Australie] ; Shawn W. Laffan [Australie]Source :
- Hydrological Processes [ 0885-6087 ] ; 2013-02-15.
Abstract
Levees, channels and water storages built on the world's floodplain wetlands control flows for irrigation, flood mitigation and erosion management. Assessing their distribution and hydrological impacts through time and across broad extents is limited by significant costs and technical challenges. We tested the effectiveness of three new semi‐automated geographic information systems and traditional visual interpretation techniques for detecting earthworks. We used commercially or freely available two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional spatial imagery within 19 quadrats in an agricultural floodplain of the Murray–Darling Basin, southeastern Australia. Semi‐automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis performed best for spatial accuracy (78% of earthworks correctly predicted within 25 m), overall classification accuracy (97.7%) and kappa (0.64), compared with traditional visual interpretation techniques using Landsat TM (52%, 96.3%, 0.39), SPOT (53%, 95.8%, 0.27) and aerial photography (72%, 97.2%, 0.31). DEM analysis also outperformed semi‐automated image segmentation (16%, 93%, 0.29) and integrated analysis (75%, 96.0%, 0.43) that used spectral information. Semi‐automated techniques were slow (DEM analysis: 27 418 s/km2; integrated analysis: 27 737 s/km2; and image segmentation: 1439 s/km2) compared with visual interpretation (Landsat TM: 109 s/km2; SPOT: 166 s/km2; and aerial photography: 276 s/km2); however, processing speed of semi‐automated techniques can be further increased without compromising accuracy. Semi‐automated techniques also offered operational autonomy following model calibration. High quality, cost‐effective earthwork mapping techniques, particularly the semi‐automated techniques in this study, are critical for understanding and managing ecosystem health, flood risk and water security in developed floodplains worldwide and should be implemented by governing institutions. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9244
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5D1770D241D9CFFAB77D7840613BD00EB3FE9A74Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Semi‐automated GIS techniques for detecting floodplain earthworks</title><author><name sortKey="Steinfeld, Celine M M" sort="Steinfeld, Celine M M" uniqKey="Steinfeld C" first="Celine M. M." last="Steinfeld">Celine M. M. Steinfeld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kingsford, Richard T" sort="Kingsford, Richard T" uniqKey="Kingsford R" first="Richard T." last="Kingsford">Richard T. Kingsford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Laffan, Shawn W" sort="Laffan, Shawn W" uniqKey="Laffan S" first="Shawn W." last="Laffan">Shawn W. Laffan</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5D1770D241D9CFFAB77D7840613BD00EB3FE9A74</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/hyp.9244</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5D1770D241D9CFFAB77D7840613BD00EB3FE9A74/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001228</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001228</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001153</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000015</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000015</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Semi‐automated GIS techniques for detecting floodplain earthworks</title><author><name sortKey="Steinfeld, Celine M M" sort="Steinfeld, Celine M M" uniqKey="Steinfeld C" first="Celine M. M." last="Steinfeld">Celine M. M. Steinfeld</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Australian Wetlands and Rivers Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement></placeName></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kingsford, Richard T" sort="Kingsford, Richard T" uniqKey="Kingsford R" first="Richard T." last="Kingsford">Richard T. Kingsford</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Australian Wetlands and Rivers Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Laffan, Shawn W" sort="Laffan, Shawn W" uniqKey="Laffan S" first="Shawn W." last="Laffan">Shawn W. Laffan</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Hydrological Processes</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Hydrol. Process.</title><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1085</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-02-15">2013-02-15</date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="579">579</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="591">591</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno></series><idno type="istex">5D1770D241D9CFFAB77D7840613BD00EB3FE9A74</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.9244</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HYP9244</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0885-6087</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Levees, channels and water storages built on the world's floodplain wetlands control flows for irrigation, flood mitigation and erosion management. Assessing their distribution and hydrological impacts through time and across broad extents is limited by significant costs and technical challenges. We tested the effectiveness of three new semi‐automated geographic information systems and traditional visual interpretation techniques for detecting earthworks. We used commercially or freely available two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional spatial imagery within 19 quadrats in an agricultural floodplain of the Murray–Darling Basin, southeastern Australia. Semi‐automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis performed best for spatial accuracy (78% of earthworks correctly predicted within 25 m), overall classification accuracy (97.7%) and kappa (0.64), compared with traditional visual interpretation techniques using Landsat TM (52%, 96.3%, 0.39), SPOT (53%, 95.8%, 0.27) and aerial photography (72%, 97.2%, 0.31). DEM analysis also outperformed semi‐automated image segmentation (16%, 93%, 0.29) and integrated analysis (75%, 96.0%, 0.43) that used spectral information. Semi‐automated techniques were slow (DEM analysis: 27 418 s/km2; integrated analysis: 27 737 s/km2; and image segmentation: 1439 s/km2) compared with visual interpretation (Landsat TM: 109 s/km2; SPOT: 166 s/km2; and aerial photography: 276 s/km2); however, processing speed of semi‐automated techniques can be further increased without compromising accuracy. Semi‐automated techniques also offered operational autonomy following model calibration. High quality, cost‐effective earthwork mapping techniques, particularly the semi‐automated techniques in this study, are critical for understanding and managing ecosystem health, flood risk and water security in developed floodplains worldwide and should be implemented by governing institutions. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li></country><settlement><li>Sydney</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Steinfeld, Celine M M" sort="Steinfeld, Celine M M" uniqKey="Steinfeld C" first="Celine M. M." last="Steinfeld">Celine M. M. Steinfeld</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Kingsford, Richard T" sort="Kingsford, Richard T" uniqKey="Kingsford R" first="Richard T." last="Kingsford">Richard T. Kingsford</name><name sortKey="Laffan, Shawn W" sort="Laffan, Shawn W" uniqKey="Laffan S" first="Shawn W." last="Laffan">Shawn W. Laffan</name><name sortKey="Steinfeld, Celine M M" sort="Steinfeld, Celine M M" uniqKey="Steinfeld C" first="Celine M. M." last="Steinfeld">Celine M. M. Steinfeld</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5D1770D241D9CFFAB77D7840613BD00EB3FE9A74
|texte= Semi‐automated GIS techniques for detecting floodplain earthworks
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |