Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">De Facto, De Rigueur, and Even Useful: Standards for the Published Literature and Their Relationship to Medical Informatics</title><author><name sortKey="Humphreys, Betsy L" sort="Humphreys, Betsy L" uniqKey="Humphreys B" first="Betsy L." last="Humphreys">Betsy L. Humphreys</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmc">2245563</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2245563</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2245563</idno><idno type="pmid">NONE</idno><date when="1990">1990</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000121</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000121</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">De Facto, De Rigueur, and Even Useful: Standards for the Published Literature and Their Relationship to Medical Informatics</title><author><name sortKey="Humphreys, Betsy L" sort="Humphreys, Betsy L" uniqKey="Humphreys B" first="Betsy L." last="Humphreys">Betsy L. Humphreys</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care</title><idno type="ISSN">0195-4210</idno><imprint><date when="1990">1990</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Over the past century, the library profession has collaborated with other interested groups to develop a variety of standards for the production, distribution, organization, and description of the published literature. Early successes in standardizing the content and format of bibliographic records gave the library community a firm basis for the creation of information standards for use in automated systems. The current array of relatively mature standards related to the published literature holds more than academic interest for those engaged in medical informatics research and development. In addition to their obvious utility for many applications involving access to the biomedical literature, some of the standards are also applicable to other types of biomedical information. Because bibliographic data share some of the complex characteristics of clinical data, a look at the types of standards that have emerged for the published literature can be helpful in identifying the range of standards to be considered for the clinical environment. An examination of the reasons for success in the development of bibliographic standards may also provide a useful perspective on efforts to develop information standards in other areas of concern to the medical informatics community.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care</journal-id><journal-title>Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0195-4210</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2245563</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Plenary Session 1990-Standards in Medical Informatics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>De Facto, De Rigueur, and Even Useful: Standards for the Published Literature and Their Relationship to Medical Informatics</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Humphreys</surname><given-names>Betsy L.</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>07</day><month>11</month><year>1990</year></pub-date><fpage>2</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><abstract><p>Over the past century, the library profession has collaborated with other interested groups to develop a variety of standards for the production, distribution, organization, and description of the published literature. Early successes in standardizing the content and format of bibliographic records gave the library community a firm basis for the creation of information standards for use in automated systems. The current array of relatively mature standards related to the published literature holds more than academic interest for those engaged in medical informatics research and development. In addition to their obvious utility for many applications involving access to the biomedical literature, some of the standards are also applicable to other types of biomedical information. Because bibliographic data share some of the complex characteristics of clinical data, a look at the types of standards that have emerged for the published literature can be helpful in identifying the range of standards to be considered for the clinical environment. An examination of the reasons for success in the development of bibliographic standards may also provide a useful perspective on efforts to develop information standards in other areas of concern to the medical informatics community.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Informatique/explor/SgmlV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0001210 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0001210 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Informatique
|area= SgmlV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |