SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.
Identifieur interne : 000074 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000073; suivant : 000075SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.
Auteurs : R. H. Dolin ; L. Alschuler ; T. Bray ; J. E. MattisonSource :
- Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium [ 1091-8280 ] ; 1997.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 1993, The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) studied several syntaxes for interchange formats in healthcare, but excluded SGML due to resource constraints. We sought to extend the CEN report and formally evaluate the use of SGML as a message interchange format. METHODS: We followed the methodology set forth by CEN, using their example scenarios and healthcare data model. General message descriptions based on this model set the functional requirements for the interchange format. These general requirements are then mapped into SGML to see how well they can be supported. RESULTS: Results follow the CEN format, enabling a direct comparison of SGML with ASN.1, ASTM E1238, EDIFACT, EUCLIDES, and ODA (those syntaxes studied by CEN). CONCLUSION: SGML compares favorably with other syntaxes investigated by CEN. None of the interchange formats support all functional requirements. Optimal and standard mechanisms of combining different formats through a modular approach to achieve greater overall functionality requires further study.
Url:
PubMed: 9357703
PubMed Central: 2233551
Links to Exploration step
PMC:2233551Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.</title><author><name sortKey="Dolin, R H" sort="Dolin, R H" uniqKey="Dolin R" first="R. H." last="Dolin">R. H. Dolin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alschuler, L" sort="Alschuler, L" uniqKey="Alschuler L" first="L." last="Alschuler">L. Alschuler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bray, T" sort="Bray, T" uniqKey="Bray T" first="T." last="Bray">T. Bray</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mattison, J E" sort="Mattison, J E" uniqKey="Mattison J" first="J. E." last="Mattison">J. E. Mattison</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">9357703</idno><idno type="pmc">2233551</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233551</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2233551</idno><date when="1997">1997</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000074</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000074</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.</title><author><name sortKey="Dolin, R H" sort="Dolin, R H" uniqKey="Dolin R" first="R. H." last="Dolin">R. H. Dolin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alschuler, L" sort="Alschuler, L" uniqKey="Alschuler L" first="L." last="Alschuler">L. Alschuler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bray, T" sort="Bray, T" uniqKey="Bray T" first="T." last="Bray">T. Bray</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mattison, J E" sort="Mattison, J E" uniqKey="Mattison J" first="J. E." last="Mattison">J. E. Mattison</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium</title><idno type="ISSN">1091-8280</idno><imprint><date when="1997">1997</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>INTRODUCTION: In 1993, The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) studied several syntaxes for interchange formats in healthcare, but excluded SGML due to resource constraints. We sought to extend the CEN report and formally evaluate the use of SGML as a message interchange format. METHODS: We followed the methodology set forth by CEN, using their example scenarios and healthcare data model. General message descriptions based on this model set the functional requirements for the interchange format. These general requirements are then mapped into SGML to see how well they can be supported. RESULTS: Results follow the CEN format, enabling a direct comparison of SGML with ASN.1, ASTM E1238, EDIFACT, EUCLIDES, and ODA (those syntaxes studied by CEN). CONCLUSION: SGML compares favorably with other syntaxes investigated by CEN. None of the interchange formats support all functional requirements. Optimal and standard mechanisms of combining different formats through a modular approach to achieve greater overall functionality requires further study.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">procamiaafs</journal-id><journal-title>Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1091-8280</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Medical Informatics Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">9357703</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2233551</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dolin</surname><given-names>R. H.</given-names></name><email>Robert.H.Dolin@kp.org</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alschuler</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mattison</surname><given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff>Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Region, USA.</aff><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>1997</year></pub-date><fpage>635</fpage><lpage>639</lpage><abstract><p>INTRODUCTION: In 1993, The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) studied several syntaxes for interchange formats in healthcare, but excluded SGML due to resource constraints. We sought to extend the CEN report and formally evaluate the use of SGML as a message interchange format. METHODS: We followed the methodology set forth by CEN, using their example scenarios and healthcare data model. General message descriptions based on this model set the functional requirements for the interchange format. These general requirements are then mapped into SGML to see how well they can be supported. RESULTS: Results follow the CEN format, enabling a direct comparison of SGML with ASN.1, ASTM E1238, EDIFACT, EUCLIDES, and ODA (those syntaxes studied by CEN). CONCLUSION: SGML compares favorably with other syntaxes investigated by CEN. None of the interchange formats support all functional requirements. Optimal and standard mechanisms of combining different formats through a modular approach to achieve greater overall functionality requires further study.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Informatique/explor/SgmlV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000074 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000074 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Informatique
|area= SgmlV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:2233551
|texte= SGML as a message interchange format in healthcare.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9357703" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SgmlV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |