Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement
Identifieur interne : 002650 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002649; suivant : 002651Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement
Auteurs : Je Lim ; Sj Lee ; Yj Kim ; Wh Lim ; Ys ChunSource :
- Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research [ 1601-6335 ] ; 2009-11.
English descriptors
Abstract
Authors – Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS Objectives – To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement. Setting and Sample Population – CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images. Results – For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest. Conclusion – Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title><author><name sortKey="Lim, Je" sort="Lim, Je" uniqKey="Lim J" first="Je" last="Lim">Je Lim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Sj" sort="Lee, Sj" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Sj" last="Lee">Sj Lee</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, Yj" sort="Kim, Yj" uniqKey="Kim Y" first="Yj" last="Kim">Yj Kim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lim, Wh" sort="Lim, Wh" uniqKey="Lim W" first="Wh" last="Lim">Wh Lim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chun, Ys" sort="Chun, Ys" uniqKey="Chun Y" first="Ys" last="Chun">Ys Chun</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002650</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title><author><name sortKey="Lim, Je" sort="Lim, Je" uniqKey="Lim J" first="Je" last="Lim">Je Lim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Sj" sort="Lee, Sj" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Sj" last="Lee">Sj Lee</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, Yj" sort="Kim, Yj" uniqKey="Kim Y" first="Yj" last="Kim">Yj Kim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lim, Wh" sort="Lim, Wh" uniqKey="Lim W" first="Wh" last="Lim">Wh Lim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chun, Ys" sort="Chun, Ys" uniqKey="Chun Y" first="Ys" last="Chun">Ys Chun</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research</title><idno type="ISSN">1601-6335</idno><idno type="eISSN">1601-6343</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-11">2009-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="299">299</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="304">304</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1601-6335</idno></series><idno type="istex">D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OCR1465</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1601-6335</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>cortical bone thickness</term><term>inter‐arch difference</term><term>root proximity</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Authors – Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS Objectives – To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement. Setting and Sample Population – CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images. Results – For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest. Conclusion – Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>JE Lim</name><affiliations><json:string>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>SJ Lee</name><affiliations><json:string>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>YJ Kim</name><affiliations><json:string>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>WH Lim</name><affiliations><json:string>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>YS Chun</name><affiliations><json:string>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cortical bone thickness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>inter‐arch difference</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>root proximity</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>OCR1465</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Authors – Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS Objectives – To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement. Setting and Sample Population – CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images. Results – For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest. Conclusion – Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.266</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1318</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>2878</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18209</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>199</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title><genre.original><json:string>article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>12</volume><publisherId><json:string>OCR</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>6</total><last>304</last><first>299</first></pages><issn><json:string>1601-6335</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1601-6343</json:string></eissn><title>Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1601-6343</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</json:string></doi><id>D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2009</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title><author><persName><forename type="first">JE</forename><surname>Lim</surname></persName><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">SJ</forename><surname>Lee</surname></persName><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">YJ</forename><surname>Kim</surname></persName><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">WH</forename><surname>Lim</surname></persName><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">YS</forename><surname>Chun</surname></persName><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research</title><idno type="pISSN">1601-6335</idno><idno type="eISSN">1601-6343</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-6343</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-11"></date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="299">299</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="304">304</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OCR1465</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2009</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Authors – Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS Objectives – To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement. Setting and Sample Population – CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images. Results – For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest. Conclusion – Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>cortical bone thickness</term></item><item><term>inter‐arch difference</term></item><item><term>root proximity</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2009-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-6343</doi><issn type="print">1601-6335</issn><issn type="electronic">1601-6343</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="OCR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ORTHODONTICS CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH">Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ocr.2009.12.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-11">November 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="OCR1465"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-10-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-10-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="299">299</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="304">304</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Won Hee Lim</i>
Department of Orthodontics
School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute
Seoul National University
Seoul 110‐768
Korea
E‐mail: <email>whlim@snu.ac.kr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:OCR.OCR1465.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Dates:</b> Accepted 30 April 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title><title type="shortAuthors">Lim et al.</title><title type="short">Bone thickness and root proximity</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>JE</givenNames><familyName>Lim</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>SJ</givenNames><familyName>Lee</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>YJ</givenNames><familyName>Kim</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>WH</givenNames><familyName>Lim</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>YS</givenNames><familyName>Chun</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="KR"><unparsedAffiliation><i>J.E. Lim</i>, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
<i>S.J. Lee</i>, <i>W.H. Lim</i>, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
<i>Y.J. Kim</i>, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
<i>Y.S. Chun</i>, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">cortical bone thickness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">inter‐arch difference</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">root proximity</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!-- To cite this article:
Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS:
Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement
Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:299–304
<title type="main">Structured Abstract</title><p><b>Authors – </b> Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS</p><p><b>Objectives – </b> To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement.</p><p><b>Setting and Sample Population – </b> CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images.</p><p><b>Results – </b> For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest.</p><p><b>Conclusion – </b> Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Bone thickness and root proximity</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">JE</namePart><namePart type="family">Lim</namePart><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">SJ</namePart><namePart type="family">Lee</namePart><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">YJ</namePart><namePart type="family">Kim</namePart><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">WH</namePart><namePart type="family">Lim</namePart><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">YS</namePart><namePart type="family">Chun</namePart><affiliation>J.E. Lim, School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, KoreaS.J. Lee, W.H. Lim, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaY.J. Kim, Institute of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaY.S. Chun, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-11</dateIssued><edition>Dates: Accepted 30 April 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Authors – Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS Objectives – To compare maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and rootic proximity for optimal mini‐implant placement. Setting and Sample Population – CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial of the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles relative to the root surface using three‐dimensional images. Results – For the cortical bone thickness, there was no statistically significant difference between the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior area; however, there was a significant difference in the posterior area. Cortical bone in the maxilla, mesial and distal to canine interradicular sites, was thickest while thickness in the mandible exhibited a gradual anterior to posterior increase. Cortical bone thickness in the maxilla increased as both level and angle increased, while the cortical bone thickness in the mandible was greatest at 4 mm from the alveolar crest. Root proximity mesial and distal to 2nd premolar interradicular sites was greatest. Conclusion – Based on our results, cortical bone thickness depends on the interradicular site rather than sex or individual differences.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>cortical bone thickness</topic><topic>inter‐arch difference</topic><topic>root proximity</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1601-6335</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1601-6343</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-6343</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">OCR</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>299</start><end>304</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">OCR1465</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/OcrV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002650 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002650 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= OcrV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D87EA5A5529E3134600DCB10E2EBA8A8C4F6A584
|texte= Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini‐implant placement
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |