HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000E37

A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs

Identifieur interne : 000E37 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000E36; suivant : 000E38

A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs

Auteurs : Robert G. Martin ; Donald R. Sanders

Source :

Journal of refractive surgery : (1995) [ 1081-597X ] ; 2005.

RBID : Pascal:06-0003804

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude comparative, Implantation, Lentille intraoculaire, Conception, Chirurgie, Ophtalmologie, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Comparative study, Design, Implantation, Intraocular lens, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Treatment.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1081-597X`
A02	`01`			`@0 JRSUFZ`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. refract. surg. : (1995)`
A05				`@2 21`
A06				`@2 6`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 MARTIN (Robert G.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 SANDERS (Donald R.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Carolina Eye Associates @2 Southern Pines, NC @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Center for Clinical Research @2 Elmhurst, Ill @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 716-721`
A21				`@1 2005`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 21122 @5 354000135189730060`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 31 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 06-0003804`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of refractive surgery : (1995)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implantation @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implantation @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implantación @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Conception @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Design @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diseño @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ophtalmologie @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ophthalmology @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oftalmología @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 25`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 25`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 25`
N21				`@1 002`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 06-0003804 INIST
ET :	A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs
AU :	MARTIN (Robert G.); SANDERS (Donald R.)
AF :	Carolina Eye Associates/Southern Pines, NC/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Center for Clinical Research/Elmhurst, Ill/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of refractive surgery : (1995); ISSN 1081-597X; Coden JRSUFZ; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 21; No. 6; Pp. 716-721; Bibl. 31 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Etude comparative; Implantation; Lentille intraoculaire; Conception; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement
ED :	Comparative study; Implantation; Intraocular lens; Design; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment
SD :	Estudio comparativo; Implantación; Lente intraocular; Diseño; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-21122.354000135189730060
ID :	06-0003804

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:06-0003804

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs</title>
<author><name sortKey="Martin, Robert G" sort="Martin, Robert G" uniqKey="Martin R" first="Robert G." last="Martin">Robert G. Martin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Carolina Eye Associates</s1>
<s2>Southern Pines, NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sanders, Donald R" sort="Sanders, Donald R" uniqKey="Sanders D" first="Donald R." last="Sanders">Donald R. Sanders</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Clinical Research</s1>
<s2>Elmhurst, Ill</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">06-0003804</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 06-0003804 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:06-0003804</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000E37</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs</title>
<author><name sortKey="Martin, Robert G" sort="Martin, Robert G" uniqKey="Martin R" first="Robert G." last="Martin">Robert G. Martin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Carolina Eye Associates</s1>
<s2>Southern Pines, NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sanders, Donald R" sort="Sanders, Donald R" uniqKey="Sanders D" first="Donald R." last="Sanders">Donald R. Sanders</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Clinical Research</s1>
<s2>Elmhurst, Ill</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of refractive surgery : (1995)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. refract. surg. : (1995)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1081-597X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of refractive surgery : (1995)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. refract. surg. : (1995)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1081-597X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Design</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Conception</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1081-597X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JRSUFZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. refract. surg. : (1995)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>21</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MARTIN (Robert G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SANDERS (Donald R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Carolina Eye Associates</s1>
<s2>Southern Pines, NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Clinical Research</s1>
<s2>Elmhurst, Ill</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>716-721</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21122</s2>
<s5>354000135189730060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>31 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>06-0003804</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of refractive surgery : (1995)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Conception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Design</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diseño</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>002</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 06-0003804 INIST</NO>
<ET>A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs</ET>
<AU>MARTIN (Robert G.); SANDERS (Donald R.)</AU>
<AF>Carolina Eye Associates/Southern Pines, NC/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Center for Clinical Research/Elmhurst, Ill/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of refractive surgery : (1995); ISSN 1081-597X; Coden JRSUFZ; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 21; No. 6; Pp. 716-721; Bibl. 31 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two eyes were randomly assigned to undergo implantation with one of four foldable IOL designs-Collamer (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, Calif), plate haptic silicone (STAAR Surgical), AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex), or the Sensar (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif). All enrolled eyes underwent wavefront assessment using the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, Tex). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were noted in higher order aberrations between the four lens groups. No significant differences were noted among the plate haptic silicone, Sensar, or AcrySof lenses at 1 week or 1 month psotoperatively, or among the Collamer, plate haptic silicone, or Sensar lenses, with regard to total higher order aberrations, although differences were observed in individual aberration terms. At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Collamer IOL had significantly less higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens (P<.01). Significantly less third and fourth order aberrations, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were observed postoperatively with the Collamer than the AcrySof IOL. There were no parameters where the AcrySof had significantly less optical aberrations than the Collamer. CONCLUSIONS: The Collamer IOL design is Associated with fewer higher order aberrations than the AcrySof lens.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Etude comparative; Implantation; Lentille intraoculaire; Conception; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Comparative study; Implantation; Intraocular lens; Design; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Estudio comparativo; Implantación; Lente intraocular; Diseño; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-21122.354000135189730060</LO>
<ID>06-0003804</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E37 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E37 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:06-0003804
   |texte=   A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs

A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri