Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice
Identifieur interne : 000860 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000859; suivant : 000861Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice
Auteurs : Maggie Mort ; Andrew SmithSource :
- Sociology : (Oxford. Print) [ 0038-0385 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
More and faster information will transform our experience of healthcare, according to policymakers, while social.theorists have argued that medicine has become 'informatizad': a new medical paradigm is being shaped. We question both the policy-led conflation of information' and 'healthcare' and ideas about the extent of the informatization of medicine, by exploring how these ideas resonate in medical work, revisiting our studies of expertise in two clinical domains where information technologies are central to practice. The projection of new information programmes as creating knowledge which is independent of space and time runs the risk of devaluing the experiential, haptic and affective knowledge of both apprentices and practitioners. Information, we argue, cannot underpin medicine unless it is recognized and defined as generative, dynamic and intimate, rather than storable and deliverable.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 09-0396578 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice |
AU : | MORT (Maggie); SMITH (Andrew) |
AF : | Lancaster University/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Royal Lancaster Infirmary/Etats-Unis (2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Sociology : (Oxford. Print); ISSN 0038-0385; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 43; No. 2; Pp. 215-231; Bibl. 2 p.1/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | More and faster information will transform our experience of healthcare, according to policymakers, while social.theorists have argued that medicine has become 'informatizad': a new medical paradigm is being shaped. We question both the policy-led conflation of information' and 'healthcare' and ideas about the extent of the informatization of medicine, by exploring how these ideas resonate in medical work, revisiting our studies of expertise in two clinical domains where information technologies are central to practice. The projection of new information programmes as creating knowledge which is independent of space and time runs the risk of devaluing the experiential, haptic and affective knowledge of both apprentices and practitioners. Information, we argue, cannot underpin medicine unless it is recognized and defined as generative, dynamic and intimate, rather than storable and deliverable. |
CC : | 52163; 521 |
FD : | Soin médical; Politique de la santé; Information; Médecine; Transmission information |
ED : | Health Care; Health Policy; Information; Medicine |
LO : | INIST-22265.354000186144130010 |
ID : | 09-0396578 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:09-0396578Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mort, Maggie" sort="Mort, Maggie" uniqKey="Mort M" first="Maggie" last="Mort">Maggie Mort</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Lancaster University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Smith, Andrew" sort="Smith, Andrew" uniqKey="Smith A" first="Andrew" last="Smith">Andrew Smith</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Royal Lancaster Infirmary</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0396578</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 09-0396578 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:09-0396578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000860</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mort, Maggie" sort="Mort, Maggie" uniqKey="Mort M" first="Maggie" last="Mort">Maggie Mort</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Lancaster University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Smith, Andrew" sort="Smith, Andrew" uniqKey="Smith A" first="Andrew" last="Smith">Andrew Smith</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Royal Lancaster Infirmary</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Sociology : (Oxford. Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Sociology : (Oxf., Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0038-0385</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Sociology : (Oxford. Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Sociology : (Oxf., Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0038-0385</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Care</term>
<term>Health Policy</term>
<term>Information</term>
<term>Medicine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Soin médical</term>
<term>Politique de la santé</term>
<term>Information</term>
<term>Médecine</term>
<term>Transmission information</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">More and faster information will transform our experience of healthcare, according to policymakers, while social.theorists have argued that medicine has become 'informatizad': a new medical paradigm is being shaped. We question both the policy-led conflation of information' and 'healthcare' and ideas about the extent of the informatization of medicine, by exploring how these ideas resonate in medical work, revisiting our studies of expertise in two clinical domains where information technologies are central to practice. The projection of new information programmes as creating knowledge which is independent of space and time runs the risk of devaluing the experiential, haptic and affective knowledge of both apprentices and practitioners. Information, we argue, cannot underpin medicine unless it is recognized and defined as generative, dynamic and intimate, rather than storable and deliverable.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0038-0385</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Sociology : (Oxf., Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>43</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MORT (Maggie)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SMITH (Andrew)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Lancaster University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Royal Lancaster Infirmary</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>215-231</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>22265</s2>
<s5>354000186144130010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>09-0396578</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Sociology : (Oxford. Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fA99><s0>3 notes</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>More and faster information will transform our experience of healthcare, according to policymakers, while social.theorists have argued that medicine has become 'informatizad': a new medical paradigm is being shaped. We question both the policy-led conflation of information' and 'healthcare' and ideas about the extent of the informatization of medicine, by exploring how these ideas resonate in medical work, revisiting our studies of expertise in two clinical domains where information technologies are central to practice. The projection of new information programmes as creating knowledge which is independent of space and time runs the risk of devaluing the experiential, haptic and affective knowledge of both apprentices and practitioners. Information, we argue, cannot underpin medicine unless it is recognized and defined as generative, dynamic and intimate, rather than storable and deliverable.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="S"><s0>52163</s0>
<s1>XV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="S"><s0>521</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Soin médical</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Health Care</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Politique de la santé</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Health Policy</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Information</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Information</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Médecine</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Medicine</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Transmission information</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>285</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 09-0396578 INIST</NO>
<ET>Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice</ET>
<AU>MORT (Maggie); SMITH (Andrew)</AU>
<AF>Lancaster University/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Royal Lancaster Infirmary/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Sociology : (Oxford. Print); ISSN 0038-0385; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 43; No. 2; Pp. 215-231; Bibl. 2 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>More and faster information will transform our experience of healthcare, according to policymakers, while social.theorists have argued that medicine has become 'informatizad': a new medical paradigm is being shaped. We question both the policy-led conflation of information' and 'healthcare' and ideas about the extent of the informatization of medicine, by exploring how these ideas resonate in medical work, revisiting our studies of expertise in two clinical domains where information technologies are central to practice. The projection of new information programmes as creating knowledge which is independent of space and time runs the risk of devaluing the experiential, haptic and affective knowledge of both apprentices and practitioners. Information, we argue, cannot underpin medicine unless it is recognized and defined as generative, dynamic and intimate, rather than storable and deliverable.</EA>
<CC>52163; 521</CC>
<FD>Soin médical; Politique de la santé; Information; Médecine; Transmission information</FD>
<ED>Health Care; Health Policy; Information; Medicine</ED>
<LO>INIST-22265.354000186144130010</LO>
<ID>09-0396578</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000860 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000860 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:09-0396578 |texte= Beyond Information : Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |