Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Identifieur interne : 003B53 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 003B52; suivant : 003B54

Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Auteurs : R Joanne Jao [États-Unis] ; Thomas W. James [États-Unis] ; Karin Harman James [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:26272239

Abstract

Research has provided strong evidence of multisensory convergence of visual and haptic information within the visual cortex. These studies implement crossmodal matching paradigms to examine how systems use information from different sensory modalities for object recognition. Developmentally, behavioral evidence of visuohaptic crossmodal processing has suggested that communication within sensory systems develops earlier than across systems; nonetheless, it is unknown how the neural mechanisms driving these behavioral effects develop. To address this gap in knowledge, BOLD functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was measured during delayed match-to-sample tasks that examined intramodal (visual-to-visual, haptic-to-haptic) and crossmodal (visual-to-haptic, haptic-to-visual) novel object recognition in children aged 7-8.5 years and adults. Tasks were further divided into sample encoding and test matching phases to dissociate the relative contributions of each. Results of crossmodal and intramodal object recognition revealed the network of known visuohaptic multisensory substrates, including the lateral occipital complex (LOC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Critically, both adults and children showed crossmodal enhancement within the LOC, suggesting a sensitivity to changes in sensory modality during recognition. These groups showed similar regions of activation, although children generally exhibited more widespread activity during sample encoding and weaker BOLD signal change during test matching than adults. Results further provided evidence of a bilateral region in the occipitotemporal cortex that was haptic-preferring in both age groups. This region abutted the bimodal LOtv, and was consistent with a medial to lateral organization that transitioned from a visual to haptic bias within the LOC. These findings converge with existing evidence of visuohaptic processing in the LOC in adults, and extend our knowledge of crossmodal processing in adults and children.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.008
PubMed: 26272239

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:26272239

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jao, R Joanne" sort="Jao, R Joanne" uniqKey="Jao R" first="R Joanne" last="Jao">R Joanne Jao</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. Electronic address: rjjao@indiana.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, Thomas W" sort="James, Thomas W" uniqKey="James T" first="Thomas W" last="James">Thomas W. James</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, Karin Harman" sort="James, Karin Harman" uniqKey="James K" first="Karin Harman" last="James">Karin Harman James</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:26272239</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26272239</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.008</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000276</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000276</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003B53</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jao, R Joanne" sort="Jao, R Joanne" uniqKey="Jao R" first="R Joanne" last="Jao">R Joanne Jao</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. Electronic address: rjjao@indiana.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, Thomas W" sort="James, Thomas W" uniqKey="James T" first="Thomas W" last="James">Thomas W. James</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, Karin Harman" sort="James, Karin Harman" uniqKey="James K" first="Karin Harman" last="James">Karin Harman James</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bloomington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Neuropsychologia</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1873-3514</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Research has provided strong evidence of multisensory convergence of visual and haptic information within the visual cortex. These studies implement crossmodal matching paradigms to examine how systems use information from different sensory modalities for object recognition. Developmentally, behavioral evidence of visuohaptic crossmodal processing has suggested that communication within sensory systems develops earlier than across systems; nonetheless, it is unknown how the neural mechanisms driving these behavioral effects develop. To address this gap in knowledge, BOLD functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was measured during delayed match-to-sample tasks that examined intramodal (visual-to-visual, haptic-to-haptic) and crossmodal (visual-to-haptic, haptic-to-visual) novel object recognition in children aged 7-8.5 years and adults. Tasks were further divided into sample encoding and test matching phases to dissociate the relative contributions of each. Results of crossmodal and intramodal object recognition revealed the network of known visuohaptic multisensory substrates, including the lateral occipital complex (LOC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Critically, both adults and children showed crossmodal enhancement within the LOC, suggesting a sensitivity to changes in sensory modality during recognition. These groups showed similar regions of activation, although children generally exhibited more widespread activity during sample encoding and weaker BOLD signal change during test matching than adults. Results further provided evidence of a bilateral region in the occipitotemporal cortex that was haptic-preferring in both age groups. This region abutted the bimodal LOtv, and was consistent with a medial to lateral organization that transitioned from a visual to haptic bias within the LOC. These findings converge with existing evidence of visuohaptic processing in the LOC in adults, and extend our knowledge of crossmodal processing in adults and children.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="In-Process">
<PMID Version="1">26272239</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-3514</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>77</Volume>
<PubDate>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>Oct</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Neuropsychologia</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Neuropsychologia</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>76-89</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.008</ELocationID>
<ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0028-3932(15)30124-X</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Research has provided strong evidence of multisensory convergence of visual and haptic information within the visual cortex. These studies implement crossmodal matching paradigms to examine how systems use information from different sensory modalities for object recognition. Developmentally, behavioral evidence of visuohaptic crossmodal processing has suggested that communication within sensory systems develops earlier than across systems; nonetheless, it is unknown how the neural mechanisms driving these behavioral effects develop. To address this gap in knowledge, BOLD functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was measured during delayed match-to-sample tasks that examined intramodal (visual-to-visual, haptic-to-haptic) and crossmodal (visual-to-haptic, haptic-to-visual) novel object recognition in children aged 7-8.5 years and adults. Tasks were further divided into sample encoding and test matching phases to dissociate the relative contributions of each. Results of crossmodal and intramodal object recognition revealed the network of known visuohaptic multisensory substrates, including the lateral occipital complex (LOC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Critically, both adults and children showed crossmodal enhancement within the LOC, suggesting a sensitivity to changes in sensory modality during recognition. These groups showed similar regions of activation, although children generally exhibited more widespread activity during sample encoding and weaker BOLD signal change during test matching than adults. Results further provided evidence of a bilateral region in the occipitotemporal cortex that was haptic-preferring in both age groups. This region abutted the bimodal LOtv, and was consistent with a medial to lateral organization that transitioned from a visual to haptic bias within the LOC. These findings converge with existing evidence of visuohaptic processing in the LOC in adults, and extend our knowledge of crossmodal processing in adults and children.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Jao</LastName>
<ForeName>R Joanne</ForeName>
<Initials>RJ</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. Electronic address: rjjao@indiana.edu.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>James</LastName>
<ForeName>Thomas W</ForeName>
<Initials>TW</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>James</LastName>
<ForeName>Karin Harman</ForeName>
<Initials>KH</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>5T32HD007475</GrantID>
<Acronym>HD</Acronym>
<Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>HD057077</GrantID>
<Acronym>HD</Acronym>
<Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 HD057077</GrantID>
<Acronym>HD</Acronym>
<Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>T32 HD007475</GrantID>
<Acronym>HD</Acronym>
<Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Neuropsychologia</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0020713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0028-3932</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8135-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7667258</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Neurosci. 1996 Nov;19(11):481-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8931274</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1072-84</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9437027</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 29;30(39):12902-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20881109</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):293-307</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20974476</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;105(2):910-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21148091</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1566-77</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21334444</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):659-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21056677</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11807554</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1706-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11992658</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 2002;31(5):553-66</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12044096</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):173-84</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12123617</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jul;16(1):137-44</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12153538</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2002 Nov;12(11):1202-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12379608</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):14-25</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12763188</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Sep;86(1):67-84</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12943617</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):41-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14511835</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Apr;21(4):236-46</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15038005</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 13;101(15):5658-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15064396</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1079-87</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15093147</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):342-51</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15129753</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):251-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15460931</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 22;8(18):3877-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9462459</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17;95(6):3295-300</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9501256</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neurology. 1999 Apr 22;52(7):1413-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10227627</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1999 Sep;128(1-2):210-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10473761</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):559-71</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16028028</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Cogn. 2005 Dec;59(3):246-57</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16157435</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neurosci Lett. 2006 Apr 24;397(3):269-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16420973</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 2006 Dec 15;175(2):420-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17055074</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):476-83</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16616940</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2006 Nov;17(11):930-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17176421</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;31(1):79-102</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17305439</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):512-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17351637</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;179(4):595-606</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17225091</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Dev Sci. 2007 Jul;10(4):F15-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17552930</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Sep;61(3):219-29</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17974316</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):255-66</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18354398</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Prog Brain Res. 2011;191:165-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21741551</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):592-602</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21783203</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):830-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22185495</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:59-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23032487</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 15;67:182-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23153968</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(2):58-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23662858</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:381-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24560914</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;60:144-58</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25017050</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Res. 2015 Jul 21;1614:75-85</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25911582</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1867-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10641320</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):324-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11224551</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):37-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11294226</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Apr;11(2):157-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11301234</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11322983</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuron. 2001 Aug 2;31(2):317-28</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11502261</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 2001 Aug 24;293(5534):1506-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11520991</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):152-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18359267</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 2008;37(2):185-96</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18456923</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):694-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18450446</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Oct;29(10):1123-38</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17924535</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):219-47</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19296930</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19396166</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):269-74</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19330441</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1977-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19896540</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Mar;2(1):67-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18985121</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 May;31(5):678-93</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19830683</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):143-56</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20404404</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5146491</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Child Dev. 1986 Feb;57(1):105-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3948587</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3608405</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1990 Oct;22(4):421-59</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2253454</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Can J Psychol. 1989 Jun;43(2):302-19</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2486501</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Child Dev. 1993 Aug;64(4):1005-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8404253</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Oct;84(1):29-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8237454</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS716247 [Available on 10/01/16]</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4609614 [Available on 10/01/16]</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Crossmodal</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Development</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Haptics</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Multisensory</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Object recognition</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Vision</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">fMRI</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pmc-release">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26272239</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0028-3932(15)30124-X</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.008</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4609614</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS716247</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Jao, R Joanne" sort="Jao, R Joanne" uniqKey="Jao R" first="R Joanne" last="Jao">R Joanne Jao</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="James, Karin Harman" sort="James, Karin Harman" uniqKey="James K" first="Karin Harman" last="James">Karin Harman James</name>
<name sortKey="James, Thomas W" sort="James, Thomas W" uniqKey="James T" first="Thomas W" last="James">Thomas W. James</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B53 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003B53 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:26272239
   |texte=   Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:26272239" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024