Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier
Identifieur interne : 001C58 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001C57; suivant : 001C59Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier
Auteurs : Michael DroletSource :
- The English Historical Review [ 0013-8266 ] ; 2008.
Abstract
The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, Le Globe, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the Journal des conomistes, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/ehr/cen252
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Drolet, Michael" sort="Drolet, Michael" uniqKey="Drolet M" first="Michael" last="Drolet">Michael Drolet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/ehr/cen252</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001C58</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Drolet, Michael" sort="Drolet, Michael" uniqKey="Drolet M" first="Michael" last="Drolet">Michael Drolet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The English Historical Review</title><idno type="ISSN">0013-8266</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4534</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2008">2008</date><biblScope unit="volume">CXXIII</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">504</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1229">1229</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1271">1271</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0013-8266</idno></series><idno type="istex">8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/ehr/cen252</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0013-8266</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, Le Globe, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the Journal des conomistes, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michael Drolet</name><affiliations><json:string>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</json:string><json:string>E-mail: michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Articles</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, Le Globe, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the Journal des conomistes, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.436</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>442 x 663 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1345</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>19908</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>121374</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>43</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>203</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>CXXIII</volume><publisherId><json:string>enghis</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>1271</last><first>1229</first></pages><issn><json:string>0013-8266</json:string></issn><issue>504</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1477-4534</json:string></eissn><title>The English Historical Review</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>HISTORY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/ehr/cen252</json:string></doi><id>8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1</id><score>0.06449519</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</p></availability><date>2008</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>I would like to express my thanks to the Faculty of History, University of Oxford, for its generosity in funding research for this project. I am grateful to Michael Broers, Penelope Corfield, Steven Englund and David McLellan who were extremely generous with their time and offered constructive comments and advice on earlier drafts of this article. Special thanks are owed to Sudhir Hazareesingh who commented extensively on the text and who was always eager to share with me his extensive and profound knowledge of the period under study here. To M. Pierre Kerbrat, secrtaire gnrale of the Acadmie des Sciences Morales et Politiques and to Mme Mireille Pastoureau conservateur gnral of the Bibliothque de lInstitut de France, I owe special thanks for granting me access to the Institut's library. Thanks too to the staff of the library of the Institut de France for being so welcoming and incredibly helpful. Pierre Boyer, Linda Cardinal, Pietro Corsi, Matthew Cragoe, Anthony Howe and Gillian Peele were generous with their advice, encouragement and hospitality: to them my thanks. Finally, I wish to record my profound gratitude to the anonymous readers who took time and care in reading an earlier draft of this article. Their comments and criticisms were very much appreciated.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Drolet</surname></persName><email>michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</email><affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The English Historical Review</title><idno type="pISSN">0013-8266</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4534</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2008"></date><biblScope unit="volume">CXXIII</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">504</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1229">1229</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1271">1271</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/ehr/cen252</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, Le Globe, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the Journal des conomistes, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Articles</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2008">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-10-14">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">enghis</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">enghis</journal-id><journal-title>The English Historical Review</journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">1477-4534</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0013-8266</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ehr/cen252</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn187">*</xref></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Drolet</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</aff><author-notes><corresp><email>michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</email></corresp><fn id="fn187"><label>*</label><p>I would like to express my thanks to the Faculty of History, University of Oxford, for its generosity in funding research for this project. I am grateful to Michael Broers, Penelope Corfield, Steven Englund and David McLellan who were extremely generous with their time and offered constructive comments and advice on earlier drafts of this article. Special thanks are owed to Sudhir Hazareesingh who commented extensively on the text and who was always eager to share with me his extensive and profound knowledge of the period under study here. To M. Pierre Kerbrat, secrétaire générale of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques and to Mme Mireille Pastoureau conservateur général of the Bibliothèque de l’Institut de France, I owe special thanks for granting me access to the Institut's library. Thanks too to the staff of the library of the Institut de France for being so welcoming and incredibly helpful. Pierre Boyer, Linda Cardinal, Pietro Corsi, Matthew Cragoe, Anthony Howe and Gillian Peele were generous with their advice, encouragement and hospitality: to them my thanks. Finally, I wish to record my profound gratitude to the anonymous readers who took time and care in reading an earlier draft of this article. Their comments and criticisms were very much appreciated.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub"><month>10</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>CXXIII</volume><issue>504</issue><fpage>1229</fpage><lpage>1271</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p>The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, <italic>Le Globe</italic>, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the <italic>Journal des Économistes</italic>, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Drolet</namePart><affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: michael.drolet@history.ox.ac.uk</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><subject><topic>Articles</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>The nineteenth century engineer, economist and politician Michel Chevalier was one of France's most controversial and celebrated figures. He was a visionary who is today almost solely remembered for having negotiated with Richard Cobden the Anglo-French Commercial treaty of 1860. In his day, Chevalier moved from being one of the fiercest critics of France's political establishment to one of its most ardent defenders. As editor-in-chief of the Saint-Simonian movement's newspaper, Le Globe, Chevalier forged much of that movement's economic thinking. Once he broke with the movement he continued to espouse economic ideas that were distinctive within the liberal credo he embraced; these ideas became central to the policies of the Second Empire, with Chevalier serving as one of Napoleon III's chief economic advisors and a distinguished member of the Council of State. This article aims to retrieve Chevalier's writings from their comparative neglect and to correct a number of imbalances in the interpretations surrounding his work. It compares and contrasts his writings with those of liberals with whom he is now most often associated, the contributors to the Journal des conomistes, and challenges the current, and meagre, historiography on Chevalier by revealing the extent to which his thought was distinctive and profoundly original.</abstract><note type="footnotes">I would like to express my thanks to the Faculty of History, University of Oxford, for its generosity in funding research for this project. I am grateful to Michael Broers, Penelope Corfield, Steven Englund and David McLellan who were extremely generous with their time and offered constructive comments and advice on earlier drafts of this article. Special thanks are owed to Sudhir Hazareesingh who commented extensively on the text and who was always eager to share with me his extensive and profound knowledge of the period under study here. To M. Pierre Kerbrat, secrtaire gnrale of the Acadmie des Sciences Morales et Politiques and to Mme Mireille Pastoureau conservateur gnral of the Bibliothque de lInstitut de France, I owe special thanks for granting me access to the Institut's library. Thanks too to the staff of the library of the Institut de France for being so welcoming and incredibly helpful. Pierre Boyer, Linda Cardinal, Pietro Corsi, Matthew Cragoe, Anthony Howe and Gillian Peele were generous with their advice, encouragement and hospitality: to them my thanks. Finally, I wish to record my profound gratitude to the anonymous readers who took time and care in reading an earlier draft of this article. Their comments and criticisms were very much appreciated.</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The English Historical Review</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0013-8266</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1477-4534</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">enghis</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">enghis</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>CXXIII</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>504</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1229</start><end>1271</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/ehr/cen252</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><covers><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/gif</mimetype><extension>gif</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/covers/gif</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/tiff</mimetype><extension>tiff</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/covers/tiff</uri></json:item></covers><annexes><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/annexes/pdf</uri></json:item></annexes><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">HISTORY</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI><json:item><type>refBibs</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1/enrichments/refBibs</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/France/explor/LeHavreV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C58 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C58 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/France
|area= LeHavreV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8110011DB58935863B64AA00AC9076E6161869D1
|texte= Industry, Class and Society: A Historiographic Reinterpretation of Michel Chevalier
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |