Serveur d'exploration sur la visibilité du Havre

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination

Identifieur interne : 000095 ( Hal/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000094; suivant : 000096

Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination

Auteurs : José Gomez De Soto [France]

Source :

RBID : Hal:hal-01099229

Descripteurs français

Abstract

The time when the last carp’s tongue hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3 (the Vénat horizon, Milcent, 2012) were buried has been a long debated issue… and still is: the assumption that the most recent hoards were abandoned at the beginning of the Early Iron Age only has been supported and remains so. The contemporaneity of Hallstatt flanged hilt-grip swords (traditionally called Gündlingen type) and these hoards has been assessed many a time, in particular because blade fragments from Gündlingen type swords as well as one Hallstatt razor were supposedly present.Relying on bibliographical sources, the author has carried out a critical review of the Early Iron Age bronze artefacts said to have been identified in some rare hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3. An overall negative result ensued.The fragments interpreted as pieces of blades from Hallstatt swords (Vénat, Granville-Sainte-Honorine, probably Chamery and some from the seemingly ambiguous discovery in Hourtin) display mere ridges underlining the edges, which cannot be taken for the fine ribs present on Gündlingen type swords. The pieces of blades come from a possibly later model of Ewart Park type swords. A few fragments from Hourtin seem to actually display embossed lines, in which case the question of pieces from Gündlingen type sword blades remains relevant. But in Western Gaul, one can nevertheless notice that embossed lines are documented on some rare swords from the end of the Bronze Age, either imported or produced locally (Mörigen type swords, including one dredged from the Garonne river near Bordeaux; a fragment of sword blade of undetermined type in Hourtin; a decorated sword blade from a variant of Vénat type carp’s tongue sword; Tarquinia type antenna-hilted swords from Amboise). A carp’s tongue sword blade from the Vénat hoard is richly decorated with incisions parallel to the midrib, simulating an actual pattern of embossed lines. The same pattern is to be found on the antenna-hilted sword blade coming from the same hoard. Potential prototypes for embossed lines decoration are thus definitely present in Western Europe. Hence, there is no need to necessarily invoke an imitation of Hallstatt swords in order to explain the genesis of western swords. Moreover, embossed lines may well be the mere stylistic evolution of the lateral angulations that exist on some blades.The razor from Guennoc Island does not come obviously from the hoard of the isle; it must be considered as an independent and uncertain discovery, maybe from a burial.The identification of various artefacts remains disputable: fragments of razors from the Petit-Villatte hoard abusively attributed to Havré type; the proximal part of a hilt with a concave oval pommel from the Prairie de Mauves hoard, which has nothing in common with the antenna-hilted Early Iron Age swords; Longy type annular plaques remotely resembling those from the Ha C Velburg-Lengenfeld burial in Bavaria. On the other hand, Ha C or Ha D bronze artefacts were sometimes later added in museums or collections to hoards’ ones, see for instance armlets in the Vénat one. A heterogeneous bunch of bronze objects of unknown provenance “enriched” the Plessé hoard.Either because of their typological determination, or because of the conditions of their discovery, the main objects relied upon for a late dating to the beginning of Early Iron Age of the large hoards from the carp’s tongue horizon do not as a consequence resist an accurate analysis. The fragments of wagons that are sometimes put forward must not be considered as late elements, but as the prototypes of their Early Iron Age correspondents, in other words as tested models, the production of which may have remained more or less unchanged throughout times, which is a rather common phenomenon. Other models of artefacts, such as armlets decorated with small protrusions, or various types of plaques, also herald the Early Iron Age types. The presence of iron pieces (the Vénat, Petit-Villatte, Isles in Chabris, and La Haute Queue in Lacroix-Saint-Ouen hoards) are now no argument for a late dating any more, since iron, already becoming less rare during Late Bronze Age, actually appears in France during Middle Bronze age and beginning of Late Bronze Age. The horse bit cheek from the Guennoc island hoard cannot be considered as a late element as it once was: it is a variant of the Wallerfangen and Corcelettes forms that are attested not only in the Wallerfangen hoard in Saarland, but in the Swiss lakeside settlements as well, abandoned at the end of Late Bronze Age. Obviously, it would be fallacious to think that the production of bronze artefacts during Late Atlantic Bronze Age 3 ceased or drastically changed at the turn of Early Iron Age. We could certainly multiply the examples of the continuity or slow evolution of artefacts, but our knowledge of this particular production during the beginning of Early Iron Age (Ha C) is overshadowed by the almost lack of hoards and the poorness of the rare ones dated from this period. The phenomenon is known to have regained importance only during the middle phase of the Early Iron Age (Ha D1), in particular through the hoards of Armorican type socketed axes in Brittany and Normandy, of ornaments in the Center-West, and the Launac type hoards in Southern Gaul. Hoards such as those of Wattenheim/Alsenborn, Kr. Kaiserslautern in Saarland, or of Scharlachkopf in Bingen, Kr. Mainz-Bingen in Rheinland-Palatinate, those of the Llyn Fawr horizon in Great-Britain, or even the socketed axe from the grave number 3 of Court-Saint-Etienne in Belgium, all testify that the typology of the commonplace bronze artefacts had remained quite similar to the Late Bronze Age one, whereas the models of swords had actually changed.

Url:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Hal:hal-01099229

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">Des éléments du Hallstatt C dans les derniers dépôts français de l'horizon métallique de l'épée en langue de carpe ? Un examen critique</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gomez De Soto, Jose" sort="Gomez De Soto, Jose" uniqKey="Gomez De Soto J" first="José" last="Gomez De Soto">José Gomez De Soto</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-206481" status="VALID">
<idno type="ISNI">0000 0001 2159 0685 </idno>
<idno type="RNSR">199512347X</idno>
<idno type="IdRef">120923149</idno>
<orgName>Centre de Recherche en Archéologie, Archéosciences, Histoire</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CReAAH</orgName>
<date type="start">1996</date>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Université de Rennes 1Bâtiment 24-25 Campus de Beaulieu263, Avenue du général LeclercCampus de BeaulieuCS 74205 -35042 Rennes Cedex- France</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://http://www.creaah.univ-rennes1.fr/</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-406201" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-300125" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-301475" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="UMR6566" active="#struct-441569" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-105160" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-7566" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-93263" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-406201" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-406201" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université Rennes 2</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Place du recteur Henri Le Moal - CS 24307 - 35043 Rennes cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-rennes2.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-300125" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300125" status="VALID">
<orgName>Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">MCC</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>3, rue de Valois 75001 Paris</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-301475" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-301475" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut National de Recherches Archeologiques Preventives</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">INRAP</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>7, rue de Madrid75008 Paris </addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.inrap.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="UMR6566" active="#struct-441569" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-441569" status="VALID">
<idno type="ISNI">0000000122597504</idno>
<idno type="IdRef">02636817X</idno>
<orgName>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CNRS</orgName>
<date type="start">1939-10-19</date>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.cnrs.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-105160" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-105160" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Rennes 1</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UR1</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>2 rue du Thabor - CS 46510 - 35065 Rennes cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-rennes1.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-7566" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-7566" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université du Maine</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UM</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Avenue Olivier Messiaen - 72085 Le Mans cedex 9</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-lemans.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-93263" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-93263" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Nantes</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UN</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>1, quai de Tourville - BP 13522 - 44035 Nantes cedex 1</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-nantes.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Rennes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Région Bretagne</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université Rennes 2 Haute Bretagne</orgName>
<orgName type="institution" wicri:auto="newGroup">Université européenne de Bretagne</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Rennes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Région Bretagne</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Rennes 1</orgName>
<orgName type="institution" wicri:auto="newGroup">Université européenne de Bretagne</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Le Mans</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Pays de la Loire</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université du Maine</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Nantes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Pays de la Loire</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Nantes</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">HAL</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Hal:hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="halId">hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="url">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099229</idno>
<date when="2014-12">2014-12</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Hal/Corpus">000151</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Hal/Curation">000151</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Hal/Checkpoint">000095</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">Des éléments du Hallstatt C dans les derniers dépôts français de l'horizon métallique de l'épée en langue de carpe ? Un examen critique</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gomez De Soto, Jose" sort="Gomez De Soto, Jose" uniqKey="Gomez De Soto J" first="José" last="Gomez De Soto">José Gomez De Soto</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-206481" status="VALID">
<idno type="ISNI">0000 0001 2159 0685 </idno>
<idno type="RNSR">199512347X</idno>
<idno type="IdRef">120923149</idno>
<orgName>Centre de Recherche en Archéologie, Archéosciences, Histoire</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CReAAH</orgName>
<date type="start">1996</date>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Université de Rennes 1Bâtiment 24-25 Campus de Beaulieu263, Avenue du général LeclercCampus de BeaulieuCS 74205 -35042 Rennes Cedex- France</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://http://www.creaah.univ-rennes1.fr/</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-406201" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-300125" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-301475" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="UMR6566" active="#struct-441569" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-105160" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-7566" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="EA" active="#struct-93263" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-406201" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-406201" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université Rennes 2</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Place du recteur Henri Le Moal - CS 24307 - 35043 Rennes cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-rennes2.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-300125" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300125" status="VALID">
<orgName>Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">MCC</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>3, rue de Valois 75001 Paris</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-301475" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-301475" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut National de Recherches Archeologiques Preventives</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">INRAP</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>7, rue de Madrid75008 Paris </addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.inrap.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="UMR6566" active="#struct-441569" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-441569" status="VALID">
<idno type="ISNI">0000000122597504</idno>
<idno type="IdRef">02636817X</idno>
<orgName>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CNRS</orgName>
<date type="start">1939-10-19</date>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.cnrs.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-105160" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-105160" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Rennes 1</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UR1</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>2 rue du Thabor - CS 46510 - 35065 Rennes cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-rennes1.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-7566" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-7566" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université du Maine</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UM</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Avenue Olivier Messiaen - 72085 Le Mans cedex 9</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-lemans.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="EA" active="#struct-93263" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-93263" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Nantes</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UN</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>1, quai de Tourville - BP 13522 - 44035 Nantes cedex 1</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-nantes.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Rennes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Région Bretagne</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université Rennes 2 Haute Bretagne</orgName>
<orgName type="institution" wicri:auto="newGroup">Université européenne de Bretagne</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Rennes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Région Bretagne</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Rennes 1</orgName>
<orgName type="institution" wicri:auto="newGroup">Université européenne de Bretagne</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Le Mans</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Pays de la Loire</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université du Maine</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Nantes</settlement>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Pays de la Loire</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Nantes</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="mix" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Bronze final atlantique 3</term>
<term>Hallstatt C</term>
<term>dépôts</term>
<term>fer</term>
<term>rasoirs</term>
<term>épées de Gündlingen</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The time when the last carp’s tongue hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3 (the Vénat horizon, Milcent, 2012) were buried has been a long debated issue… and still is: the assumption that the most recent hoards were abandoned at the beginning of the Early Iron Age only has been supported and remains so. The contemporaneity of Hallstatt flanged hilt-grip swords (traditionally called Gündlingen type) and these hoards has been assessed many a time, in particular because blade fragments from Gündlingen type swords as well as one Hallstatt razor were supposedly present.Relying on bibliographical sources, the author has carried out a critical review of the Early Iron Age bronze artefacts said to have been identified in some rare hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3. An overall negative result ensued.The fragments interpreted as pieces of blades from Hallstatt swords (Vénat, Granville-Sainte-Honorine, probably Chamery and some from the seemingly ambiguous discovery in Hourtin) display mere ridges underlining the edges, which cannot be taken for the fine ribs present on Gündlingen type swords. The pieces of blades come from a possibly later model of Ewart Park type swords. A few fragments from Hourtin seem to actually display embossed lines, in which case the question of pieces from Gündlingen type sword blades remains relevant. But in Western Gaul, one can nevertheless notice that embossed lines are documented on some rare swords from the end of the Bronze Age, either imported or produced locally (Mörigen type swords, including one dredged from the Garonne river near Bordeaux; a fragment of sword blade of undetermined type in Hourtin; a decorated sword blade from a variant of Vénat type carp’s tongue sword; Tarquinia type antenna-hilted swords from Amboise). A carp’s tongue sword blade from the Vénat hoard is richly decorated with incisions parallel to the midrib, simulating an actual pattern of embossed lines. The same pattern is to be found on the antenna-hilted sword blade coming from the same hoard. Potential prototypes for embossed lines decoration are thus definitely present in Western Europe. Hence, there is no need to necessarily invoke an imitation of Hallstatt swords in order to explain the genesis of western swords. Moreover, embossed lines may well be the mere stylistic evolution of the lateral angulations that exist on some blades.The razor from Guennoc Island does not come obviously from the hoard of the isle; it must be considered as an independent and uncertain discovery, maybe from a burial.The identification of various artefacts remains disputable: fragments of razors from the Petit-Villatte hoard abusively attributed to Havré type; the proximal part of a hilt with a concave oval pommel from the Prairie de Mauves hoard, which has nothing in common with the antenna-hilted Early Iron Age swords; Longy type annular plaques remotely resembling those from the Ha C Velburg-Lengenfeld burial in Bavaria. On the other hand, Ha C or Ha D bronze artefacts were sometimes later added in museums or collections to hoards’ ones, see for instance armlets in the Vénat one. A heterogeneous bunch of bronze objects of unknown provenance “enriched” the Plessé hoard.Either because of their typological determination, or because of the conditions of their discovery, the main objects relied upon for a late dating to the beginning of Early Iron Age of the large hoards from the carp’s tongue horizon do not as a consequence resist an accurate analysis. The fragments of wagons that are sometimes put forward must not be considered as late elements, but as the prototypes of their Early Iron Age correspondents, in other words as tested models, the production of which may have remained more or less unchanged throughout times, which is a rather common phenomenon. Other models of artefacts, such as armlets decorated with small protrusions, or various types of plaques, also herald the Early Iron Age types. The presence of iron pieces (the Vénat, Petit-Villatte, Isles in Chabris, and La Haute Queue in Lacroix-Saint-Ouen hoards) are now no argument for a late dating any more, since iron, already becoming less rare during Late Bronze Age, actually appears in France during Middle Bronze age and beginning of Late Bronze Age. The horse bit cheek from the Guennoc island hoard cannot be considered as a late element as it once was: it is a variant of the Wallerfangen and Corcelettes forms that are attested not only in the Wallerfangen hoard in Saarland, but in the Swiss lakeside settlements as well, abandoned at the end of Late Bronze Age. Obviously, it would be fallacious to think that the production of bronze artefacts during Late Atlantic Bronze Age 3 ceased or drastically changed at the turn of Early Iron Age. We could certainly multiply the examples of the continuity or slow evolution of artefacts, but our knowledge of this particular production during the beginning of Early Iron Age (Ha C) is overshadowed by the almost lack of hoards and the poorness of the rare ones dated from this period. The phenomenon is known to have regained importance only during the middle phase of the Early Iron Age (Ha D1), in particular through the hoards of Armorican type socketed axes in Brittany and Normandy, of ornaments in the Center-West, and the Launac type hoards in Southern Gaul. Hoards such as those of Wattenheim/Alsenborn, Kr. Kaiserslautern in Saarland, or of Scharlachkopf in Bingen, Kr. Mainz-Bingen in Rheinland-Palatinate, those of the Llyn Fawr horizon in Great-Britain, or even the socketed axe from the grave number 3 of Court-Saint-Etienne in Belgium, all testify that the typology of the commonplace bronze artefacts had remained quite similar to the Late Bronze Age one, whereas the models of swords had actually changed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<hal api="V3">
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">Des éléments du Hallstatt C dans les derniers dépôts français de l'horizon métallique de l'épée en langue de carpe ? Un examen critique</title>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">José</forename>
<surname>Gomez De Soto</surname>
</persName>
<email></email>
<idno type="halauthor">1112020</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-206481"></affiliation>
</author>
<editor role="depositor">
<persName>
<forename>José</forename>
<surname>Gomez De Soto</surname>
</persName>
<email>jgzdsoto@free.fr</email>
</editor>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="v1" type="current">
<date type="whenSubmitted">2015-01-01 18:40:05</date>
<date type="whenWritten">2014</date>
<date type="whenModified">2016-10-21 01:49:02</date>
<date type="whenReleased">2015-01-06 13:17:41</date>
<date type="whenProduced">2014-12</date>
<date type="whenEndEmbargoed">2015-01-01</date>
<ref type="file" target="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099229/document">
<date notBefore="2015-01-01"></date>
</ref>
<ref type="file" subtype="author" n="1" target="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099229/file/D%C3%A9p%C3%B4ts%20BFa%203%20et%20Ha%20C.Texte.pdf">
<date notBefore="2015-01-01"></date>
</ref>
</edition>
<respStmt>
<resp>contributor</resp>
<name key="126315">
<persName>
<forename>José</forename>
<surname>Gomez De Soto</surname>
</persName>
<email>jgzdsoto@free.fr</email>
</name>
</respStmt>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<distributor>CCSD</distributor>
<idno type="halId">hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="halBibtex">gomezdesoto:hal-01099229</idno>
<idno type="halRefHtml">Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française., Société préhistorique française, 2014, 111 (4), pp.727-738</idno>
<idno type="halRef">Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française., Société préhistorique française, 2014, 111 (4), pp.727-738</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="stamp" n="SHS">Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UNIV-NANTES">Université de Nantes</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UNIV-RENNES1">Université de Rennes 1</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="CNRS">CNRS - Centre national de la recherche scientifique</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="OSUR">Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Rennes</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="CREAAH">Centre de Recherche en Archéologie, Archéosciences, Histoire</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="FRANTIQ">FRANTIQ Fédération et ressources sur l’Antiquité</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UR2-HB">Université Rennes 2 - Haute Bretagne</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UR1-SHS">UR1 - publications SHS</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UNIV-LEMANS">Université du Maine</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="INRAP">institut national de recherches archeologiques preventives</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UR1-HAL">Publications labos UR1 dans HAL-Rennes 1</idno>
</seriesStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="audience" n="2">International</note>
<note type="popular" n="0">No</note>
<note type="peer" n="1">Yes</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">Des éléments du Hallstatt C dans les derniers dépôts français de l'horizon métallique de l'épée en langue de carpe ? Un examen critique</title>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">José</forename>
<surname>Gomez De Soto</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halAuthorId">1112020</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-206481"></affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<idno type="halJournalId" status="INCOMING">26344</idno>
<title level="j">Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française.</title>
<imprint>
<publisher>Société préhistorique française</publisher>
<biblScope unit="volume">111</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="pp">727-738</biblScope>
<date type="datePub">2014-12</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<profileDesc>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">English</language>
</langUsage>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="author">
<term xml:lang="fr">Bronze final atlantique 3</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Hallstatt C</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">dépôts</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">épées de Gündlingen</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">rasoirs</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">fer</term>
</keywords>
<classCode scheme="halDomain" n="shs.archeo">Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory</classCode>
<classCode scheme="halTypology" n="ART">Journal articles</classCode>
</textClass>
<abstract xml:lang="en">The time when the last carp’s tongue hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3 (the Vénat horizon, Milcent, 2012) were buried has been a long debated issue… and still is: the assumption that the most recent hoards were abandoned at the beginning of the Early Iron Age only has been supported and remains so. The contemporaneity of Hallstatt flanged hilt-grip swords (traditionally called Gündlingen type) and these hoards has been assessed many a time, in particular because blade fragments from Gündlingen type swords as well as one Hallstatt razor were supposedly present.Relying on bibliographical sources, the author has carried out a critical review of the Early Iron Age bronze artefacts said to have been identified in some rare hoards from Atlantic Late Bronze Age 3. An overall negative result ensued.The fragments interpreted as pieces of blades from Hallstatt swords (Vénat, Granville-Sainte-Honorine, probably Chamery and some from the seemingly ambiguous discovery in Hourtin) display mere ridges underlining the edges, which cannot be taken for the fine ribs present on Gündlingen type swords. The pieces of blades come from a possibly later model of Ewart Park type swords. A few fragments from Hourtin seem to actually display embossed lines, in which case the question of pieces from Gündlingen type sword blades remains relevant. But in Western Gaul, one can nevertheless notice that embossed lines are documented on some rare swords from the end of the Bronze Age, either imported or produced locally (Mörigen type swords, including one dredged from the Garonne river near Bordeaux; a fragment of sword blade of undetermined type in Hourtin; a decorated sword blade from a variant of Vénat type carp’s tongue sword; Tarquinia type antenna-hilted swords from Amboise). A carp’s tongue sword blade from the Vénat hoard is richly decorated with incisions parallel to the midrib, simulating an actual pattern of embossed lines. The same pattern is to be found on the antenna-hilted sword blade coming from the same hoard. Potential prototypes for embossed lines decoration are thus definitely present in Western Europe. Hence, there is no need to necessarily invoke an imitation of Hallstatt swords in order to explain the genesis of western swords. Moreover, embossed lines may well be the mere stylistic evolution of the lateral angulations that exist on some blades.The razor from Guennoc Island does not come obviously from the hoard of the isle; it must be considered as an independent and uncertain discovery, maybe from a burial.The identification of various artefacts remains disputable: fragments of razors from the Petit-Villatte hoard abusively attributed to Havré type; the proximal part of a hilt with a concave oval pommel from the Prairie de Mauves hoard, which has nothing in common with the antenna-hilted Early Iron Age swords; Longy type annular plaques remotely resembling those from the Ha C Velburg-Lengenfeld burial in Bavaria. On the other hand, Ha C or Ha D bronze artefacts were sometimes later added in museums or collections to hoards’ ones, see for instance armlets in the Vénat one. A heterogeneous bunch of bronze objects of unknown provenance “enriched” the Plessé hoard.Either because of their typological determination, or because of the conditions of their discovery, the main objects relied upon for a late dating to the beginning of Early Iron Age of the large hoards from the carp’s tongue horizon do not as a consequence resist an accurate analysis. The fragments of wagons that are sometimes put forward must not be considered as late elements, but as the prototypes of their Early Iron Age correspondents, in other words as tested models, the production of which may have remained more or less unchanged throughout times, which is a rather common phenomenon. Other models of artefacts, such as armlets decorated with small protrusions, or various types of plaques, also herald the Early Iron Age types. The presence of iron pieces (the Vénat, Petit-Villatte, Isles in Chabris, and La Haute Queue in Lacroix-Saint-Ouen hoards) are now no argument for a late dating any more, since iron, already becoming less rare during Late Bronze Age, actually appears in France during Middle Bronze age and beginning of Late Bronze Age. The horse bit cheek from the Guennoc island hoard cannot be considered as a late element as it once was: it is a variant of the Wallerfangen and Corcelettes forms that are attested not only in the Wallerfangen hoard in Saarland, but in the Swiss lakeside settlements as well, abandoned at the end of Late Bronze Age. Obviously, it would be fallacious to think that the production of bronze artefacts during Late Atlantic Bronze Age 3 ceased or drastically changed at the turn of Early Iron Age. We could certainly multiply the examples of the continuity or slow evolution of artefacts, but our knowledge of this particular production during the beginning of Early Iron Age (Ha C) is overshadowed by the almost lack of hoards and the poorness of the rare ones dated from this period. The phenomenon is known to have regained importance only during the middle phase of the Early Iron Age (Ha D1), in particular through the hoards of Armorican type socketed axes in Brittany and Normandy, of ornaments in the Center-West, and the Launac type hoards in Southern Gaul. Hoards such as those of Wattenheim/Alsenborn, Kr. Kaiserslautern in Saarland, or of Scharlachkopf in Bingen, Kr. Mainz-Bingen in Rheinland-Palatinate, those of the Llyn Fawr horizon in Great-Britain, or even the socketed axe from the grave number 3 of Court-Saint-Etienne in Belgium, all testify that the typology of the commonplace bronze artefacts had remained quite similar to the Late Bronze Age one, whereas the models of swords had actually changed.</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="fr">Résumé La date d’enfouissement des derniers dépôts français de l’horizon métallique de l’épée en langue de carpe, traditionnellement datés du Bronze final atlantique 3, et plus précisément de sa phase BFa 3 récent (horizon de Vénat) reste encore débattue : les plus récents n’auraient en fait été abandonnés qu’au début du premier âge du Fer (Ha C). Au terme de l’inventaire critique des bronzes du Ha C prétendument identifiés dans quelques rares dépôts du BFa 3 récent, le bilan apparaît globalement négatif. Des fragments interprétés comme débris de lames d’épées hallstattiennes (Vénat, Graville-Sainte-Honorine et probablement Chamery) ne portent que de simples arêtes soulignant leurs bords, pas les fines moulures des épées de Gündlingen : il s’agit d’épées du type d’Ewart Park, possiblement tardives. Pour quelques fragments de la trouvaille ambigüe d’Hourtin qui présenteraient bien des filets en relief, la question peut rester posée. Mais on remarque qu’en Gaule de l’Ouest, le décor de filets en relief est attesté sur quelques épées du Bronze final, importées ou de production régionale (épées du type de Mörigen, fragment de lame d’épée de type indéterminé d’Hourtin, épée variante du type en langue de carpe de Vénat, épées du type de Tarquinia d’Amboise) ; de Vénat, une lame d’épée en langue de carpe et celle de l’épée à antennes portent un décor d’incisions parallèles simulant des filets en relief : il existait en Occident des prototypes possibles pour les décors de filets en relief des épées du type de Gündlingen. Ces derniers pourraient d’ailleurs n’être aussi qu’une simple évolution stylistique des angulations latérales des lames de certaines épées du type d’Ewart Park. Le rasoir de l’île Guennoc ne provient pas du dépôt, mais constitue une trouvaille indépendante de nature incertaine. L’interprétation de divers objets reste discutable : rasoirs de Petit Villatte abusivement attribués au type de Havré, partie proximale de poignée à pommeau ovale de la Prairie de Mauves sans rapport avec ceux des épées à antennes du premier âge du Fer, appliques annulaires du type de Longy bien différentes celles du Ha C de la tombe de Velburg-Lengenfeld, etc. La branche de mors du dépôt de l’île Guennoc, variante des formes Wallerfangen ou Corcelettes attestées dans les stations littorales helvétiques, ne peut non plus être considérée comme un élément tardif.Enfin, des bronzes du Ha C voire D furent parfois tardivement – par négligence ou frauduleusement - ajoutés à ceux des dépôts dans les collections (Vénat ; dépôt de Plessé « enrichi » d’un lot hétéroclite de bronzes de provenance inconnue dont une épée de Gündlingen). Quant aux pièces de char parfois évoquées, ce sont, non des éléments tardifs, mais les prototypes de leurs équivalentes du premier âge du Fer, autrement dit des modèles éprouvés dont la production put traverser le temps sans changement aucun ou notable. D’autres modèles d’objets (bracelets à petites bossettes, différents types d’appliques, etc.) annoncent eux aussi des types du Ha C. La présence du fer (Vénat, Petit Villatte, les Isles à Chabris, la Haute Queue à Lacroix-Saint-Ouen) ne peut être un argument de datation tardive : moins anecdotique à la fin de l’âge du Bronze, ses premières occurrences en France remontent au Bronze moyen et au Bronze final 1. Il serait évidemment fallacieux d’estimer que la production bronzière du BFa 3 cessa ou se modifia drastiquement au tournant du Ha C vers 800 av. n. è. Notre connaissance de cette production au cours du Ha C se trouve occultée par la quasi-absence de dépôts et la pauvreté des rares attribuables à cette période. Ceux de Wattenheim/Alsenborn en Sarre ou de Scharlachkopf à Bingen en Rhénanie-Palatinat, ceux de l’horizon britannique de Llyn Fawr, la hache à douille de la tombelle 3 de Court-Saint-Etienne en Belgique, etc., montrent une typologie des objets d’usage courant en bronze peu différente de celle du Bronze final, alors que les modèles d’épées, eux, avaient changé. </abstract>
</profileDesc>
</hal>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/France/explor/LeHavreV1/Data/Hal/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000095 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Hal/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000095 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/France
   |area=    LeHavreV1
   |flux=    Hal
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Hal:hal-01099229
   |texte=   Hallstatt CArtefacts in Carp's Toungue Hoards ? A critical examination
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Sat Dec 3 14:37:02 2016. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 08:25:07 2024