Serveur d'exploration sur le LRGP

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge

Identifieur interne : 000676 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000675; suivant : 000677

Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge

Auteurs : C. Lopez ; M. N. Pons ; E. Morgenroth

Source :

RBID : Pascal:05-0102743

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0043-1354
A02 01      @0 WATRAG
A03   1    @0 Water res. : (Oxf.)
A05       @2 39
A06       @2 2-3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge
A11 01  1    @1 LOPEZ (C.)
A11 02  1    @1 PONS (M. N.)
A11 03  1    @1 MORGENROTH (E.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue @2 Urbana, IL 61801 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A14 02      @1 Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451 @2 54001 Nancy @3 FRA @Z 2 aut.
A14 03      @1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive @2 Urbana, IL 61801 @3 USA @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 456-468
A21       @1 2005
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 8940A @5 354000126115480200
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 05-0102743
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Water research : (Oxford)
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.
C02 01  X    @0 001D16A05A
C02 02  X    @0 002A31D07A
C02 03  X    @0 215
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Epuration eau usée @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Waste water purification @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Depuración aguas servidas @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Epuration biologique @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Biological purification @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Depuración biológica @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Boue activée @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Activated sludge @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Lodo activado @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Floc @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Flock @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Borla @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Analyse image @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Image analysis @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Análisis imagen @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Analyse structurale @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Structural analysis @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Análisis estructural @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Agrégat @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Aggregate @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Agregado @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Analyse quantitative @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Quantitative analysis @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Análisis cuantitativo @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Microscopie épifluorescence @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Epifluorescence microscopy @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Microscopía epifluorescencia @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Microscopie confocale @5 10
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Confocal microscopy @5 10
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Microscopía confocal @5 10
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Microscope laser @5 11
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Laser microscope @5 11
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Microscopio láser @5 11
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Microscope balayage @5 12
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Scanning microscope @5 12
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Microscopio barrido @5 12
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Excitation 2 photons @5 13
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Two photon excitation @5 13
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Excitación 2 fotones @5 13
N21       @1 066
N44 01      @1 PSI
N82       @1 PSI

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 05-0102743 INIST
ET : Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge
AU : LOPEZ (C.); PONS (M. N.); MORGENROTH (E.)
AF : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue/Urbana, IL 61801/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 3 aut.); Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451/54001 Nancy/France (2 aut.); Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive/Urbana, IL 61801/Etats-Unis (3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Water research : (Oxford); ISSN 0043-1354; Coden WATRAG; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2005; Vol. 39; No. 2-3; Pp. 456-468; Bibl. 1 p.1/4
LA : Anglais
EA : Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.
CC : 001D16A05A; 002A31D07A; 215
FD : Epuration eau usée; Epuration biologique; Boue activée; Floc; Analyse image; Analyse structurale; Agrégat; Analyse quantitative; Microscopie épifluorescence; Microscopie confocale; Microscope laser; Microscope balayage; Excitation 2 photons
ED : Waste water purification; Biological purification; Activated sludge; Flock; Image analysis; Structural analysis; Aggregate; Quantitative analysis; Epifluorescence microscopy; Confocal microscopy; Laser microscope; Scanning microscope; Two photon excitation
SD : Depuración aguas servidas; Depuración biológica; Lodo activado; Borla; Análisis imagen; Análisis estructural; Agregado; Análisis cuantitativo; Microscopía epifluorescencia; Microscopía confocal; Microscopio láser; Microscopio barrido; Excitación 2 fotones
LO : INIST-8940A.354000126115480200
ID : 05-0102743

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:05-0102743

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lopez, C" sort="Lopez, C" uniqKey="Lopez C" first="C." last="Lopez">C. Lopez</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pons, M N" sort="Pons, M N" uniqKey="Pons M" first="M. N." last="Pons">M. N. Pons</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451</s1>
<s2>54001 Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morgenroth, E" sort="Morgenroth, E" uniqKey="Morgenroth E" first="E." last="Morgenroth">E. Morgenroth</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0102743</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0102743 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0102743</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000676</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lopez, C" sort="Lopez, C" uniqKey="Lopez C" first="C." last="Lopez">C. Lopez</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pons, M N" sort="Pons, M N" uniqKey="Pons M" first="M. N." last="Pons">M. N. Pons</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451</s1>
<s2>54001 Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morgenroth, E" sort="Morgenroth, E" uniqKey="Morgenroth E" first="E." last="Morgenroth">E. Morgenroth</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Water research : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Water res. : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0043-1354</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Water research : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Water res. : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0043-1354</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Activated sludge</term>
<term>Aggregate</term>
<term>Biological purification</term>
<term>Confocal microscopy</term>
<term>Epifluorescence microscopy</term>
<term>Flock</term>
<term>Image analysis</term>
<term>Laser microscope</term>
<term>Quantitative analysis</term>
<term>Scanning microscope</term>
<term>Structural analysis</term>
<term>Two photon excitation</term>
<term>Waste water purification</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Epuration eau usée</term>
<term>Epuration biologique</term>
<term>Boue activée</term>
<term>Floc</term>
<term>Analyse image</term>
<term>Analyse structurale</term>
<term>Agrégat</term>
<term>Analyse quantitative</term>
<term>Microscopie épifluorescence</term>
<term>Microscopie confocale</term>
<term>Microscope laser</term>
<term>Microscope balayage</term>
<term>Excitation 2 photons</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0043-1354</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>WATRAG</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Water res. : (Oxf.)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>39</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2-3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>LOPEZ (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>PONS (M. N.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>MORGENROTH (E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451</s1>
<s2>54001 Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive</s1>
<s2>Urbana, IL 61801</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>456-468</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>8940A</s2>
<s5>354000126115480200</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>05-0102743</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Water research : (Oxford)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001D16A05A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002A31D07A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X">
<s0>215</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Epuration eau usée</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Waste water purification</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Depuración aguas servidas</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Epuration biologique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Biological purification</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Depuración biológica</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Boue activée</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Activated sludge</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Lodo activado</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Floc</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Flock</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Borla</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse image</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Image analysis</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis imagen</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse structurale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Structural analysis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis estructural</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Agrégat</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Aggregate</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Agregado</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse quantitative</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Quantitative analysis</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis cuantitativo</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Microscopie épifluorescence</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Epifluorescence microscopy</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Microscopía epifluorescencia</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Microscopie confocale</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Confocal microscopy</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Microscopía confocal</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Microscope laser</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Laser microscope</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Microscopio láser</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Microscope balayage</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Scanning microscope</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Microscopio barrido</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Excitation 2 photons</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Two photon excitation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Excitación 2 fotones</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>066</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 05-0102743 INIST</NO>
<ET>Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge</ET>
<AU>LOPEZ (C.); PONS (M. N.); MORGENROTH (E.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3219 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 250, 205 North Mathews Avenue/Urbana, IL 61801/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 3 aut.); Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie, Chimique, CNRS-ENSIC-INPL, BP 451/54001 Nancy/France (2 aut.); Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 West Gregory Drive/Urbana, IL 61801/Etats-Unis (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Water research : (Oxford); ISSN 0043-1354; Coden WATRAG; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2005; Vol. 39; No. 2-3; Pp. 456-468; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Microscopic techniques ranging from epifluorescence microscopy to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon excitation laser scanning microscopy (TPE-LSM) combined with fluorescent stains can help to evaluate complex microbial aggregates such as activated sludge flocs. To determine the application limits of these microscopic techniques, activated sludge samples from three different sources were evaluated after staining with a fluorescent viability indicator (Baclight Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes). Image analysis routines were developed to quantify overall amounts of red and green stained cells, location of stained cells within the flocs, and the spatial organization in clusters and filaments. It was found that the selection of the appropriate microscopic technique depends strongly on the type of microbial aggregates being analyzed. For flocs with high cell density, the use of TPE-LSM is preferred, since it provides a clearer image of the internal structure of the aggregate. Epifluorescence microscopy did not allow to reliably quantify red stained cells in dense aggregates. CLSM did not adequately image the internal filamentous structure and the location of stained cells within dense flocs. However, for typical activated sludge flocs epifluorescence and CLSM proved adequate.</EA>
<CC>001D16A05A; 002A31D07A; 215</CC>
<FD>Epuration eau usée; Epuration biologique; Boue activée; Floc; Analyse image; Analyse structurale; Agrégat; Analyse quantitative; Microscopie épifluorescence; Microscopie confocale; Microscope laser; Microscope balayage; Excitation 2 photons</FD>
<ED>Waste water purification; Biological purification; Activated sludge; Flock; Image analysis; Structural analysis; Aggregate; Quantitative analysis; Epifluorescence microscopy; Confocal microscopy; Laser microscope; Scanning microscope; Two photon excitation</ED>
<SD>Depuración aguas servidas; Depuración biológica; Lodo activado; Borla; Análisis imagen; Análisis estructural; Agregado; Análisis cuantitativo; Microscopía epifluorescencia; Microscopía confocal; Microscopio láser; Microscopio barrido; Excitación 2 fotones</SD>
<LO>INIST-8940A.354000126115480200</LO>
<ID>05-0102743</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/LrgpV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000676 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000676 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Lorraine
   |area=    LrgpV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:05-0102743
   |texte=   Evaluation of microscopic techniques (epifluorescence microscopy, CLSM, TPE-LSM) as a basis for the quantitative image analysis of activated sludge
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Sat Nov 11 15:47:48 2017. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 23:31:34 2024