Serveur d'exploration sur la recherche en informatique en Lorraine

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background

Identifieur interne : 000020 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000019; suivant : 000021

Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background

Auteurs : V. Colelli ; P. Campus ; D. Conversi ; C. Orsini ; S. Cabib

Source :

RBID : Pascal:14-0148246

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 1074-7427
A03   1    @0 Neurobiol. learn. mem. : (Print)
A05       @2 111
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background
A11 01  1    @1 COLELLI (V.)
A11 02  1    @1 CAMPUS (P.)
A11 03  1    @1 CONVERSI (D.)
A11 04  1    @1 ORSINI (C.)
A11 05  1    @1 CABIB (S.)
A14 01      @1 Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78 @2 00185 Rome @3 ITA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A14 02      @1 Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64 @2 00143 Rome @3 ITA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A20       @1 49-55
A21       @1 2014
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 14380A @5 354000502742090070
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.
A47 01  1    @0 14-0148246
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print)
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26C
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Hippocampe @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Hippocampus @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Hipocampo @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Corps strié @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Corpus striatum @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Cuerpo estriado @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Consolidation @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Consolidation @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Consolidación @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Génétique @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Genetics @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Genética @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Comparaison interindividuelle @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Interindividual comparison @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Comparación interindividual @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Style cognitif @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Cognitive style @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Estilo cognitivo @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Style apprentissage @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Learning style @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Estilo aprendizaje @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Apprentissage @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Learning @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Aprendizaje @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Stress @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Stress @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Estrés @5 09
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Encéphale @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Encephalon @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Encéfalo @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Système nerveux central @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Central nervous system @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Sistema nervioso central @5 38
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Noyau gris central @5 39
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Basal ganglion @5 39
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Núcleo basal @5 39
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Processus acquisition @5 40
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Acquisition process @5 40
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Proceso adquisición @5 40
N21       @1 188
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 14-0148246 INIST
ET : Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background
AU : COLELLI (V.); CAMPUS (P.); CONVERSI (D.); ORSINI (C.); CABIB (S.)
AF : Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78/00185 Rome/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64/00143 Rome/Italie (3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print); ISSN 1074-7427; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 111; Pp. 49-55; Bibl. 1 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.
CC : 002A26C
FD : Hippocampe; Corps strié; Consolidation; Génétique; Comparaison interindividuelle; Style cognitif; Style apprentissage; Apprentissage; Stress
FG : Encéphale; Système nerveux central; Noyau gris central; Processus acquisition
ED : Hippocampus; Corpus striatum; Consolidation; Genetics; Interindividual comparison; Cognitive style; Learning style; Learning; Stress
EG : Encephalon; Central nervous system; Basal ganglion; Acquisition process
SD : Hipocampo; Cuerpo estriado; Consolidación; Genética; Comparación interindividual; Estilo cognitivo; Estilo aprendizaje; Aprendizaje; Estrés
LO : INIST-14380A.354000502742090070
ID : 14-0148246

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:14-0148246

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Colelli, V" sort="Colelli, V" uniqKey="Colelli V" first="V." last="Colelli">V. Colelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Campus, P" sort="Campus, P" uniqKey="Campus P" first="P." last="Campus">P. Campus</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Conversi, D" sort="Conversi, D" uniqKey="Conversi D" first="D." last="Conversi">D. Conversi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Orsini, C" sort="Orsini, C" uniqKey="Orsini C" first="C." last="Orsini">C. Orsini</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cabib, S" sort="Cabib, S" uniqKey="Cabib S" first="S." last="Cabib">S. Cabib</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0148246</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0148246 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0148246</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000020</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Colelli, V" sort="Colelli, V" uniqKey="Colelli V" first="V." last="Colelli">V. Colelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Campus, P" sort="Campus, P" uniqKey="Campus P" first="P." last="Campus">P. Campus</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Conversi, D" sort="Conversi, D" uniqKey="Conversi D" first="D." last="Conversi">D. Conversi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Orsini, C" sort="Orsini, C" uniqKey="Orsini C" first="C." last="Orsini">C. Orsini</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cabib, S" sort="Cabib, S" uniqKey="Cabib S" first="S." last="Cabib">S. Cabib</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neurobiol. learn. mem. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1074-7427</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neurobiol. learn. mem. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1074-7427</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Cognitive style</term>
<term>Consolidation</term>
<term>Corpus striatum</term>
<term>Genetics</term>
<term>Hippocampus</term>
<term>Interindividual comparison</term>
<term>Learning</term>
<term>Learning style</term>
<term>Stress</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Hippocampe</term>
<term>Corps strié</term>
<term>Consolidation</term>
<term>Génétique</term>
<term>Comparaison interindividuelle</term>
<term>Style cognitif</term>
<term>Style apprentissage</term>
<term>Apprentissage</term>
<term>Stress</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>1074-7427</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Neurobiol. learn. mem. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>111</s2>
</fA05>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>COLELLI (V.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>CAMPUS (P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>CONVERSI (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>ORSINI (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>CABIB (S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78</s1>
<s2>00185 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64</s1>
<s2>00143 Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>49-55</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14380A</s2>
<s5>354000502742090070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>14-0148246</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Hippocampe</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Hippocampus</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hipocampo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Corps strié</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Corpus striatum</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cuerpo estriado</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Consolidation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Consolidation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Consolidación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Génétique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Genetics</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Genética</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Comparaison interindividuelle</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Interindividual comparison</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Comparación interindividual</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Style cognitif</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognitive style</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estilo cognitivo</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Style apprentissage</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Learning style</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estilo aprendizaje</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Apprentissage</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Learning</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aprendizaje</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Encéphale</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Encephalon</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Encéfalo</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Système nerveux central</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Central nervous system</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema nervioso central</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Noyau gris central</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Basal ganglion</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Núcleo basal</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Processus acquisition</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Acquisition process</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Proceso adquisición</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>188</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 14-0148246 INIST</NO>
<ET>Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background</ET>
<AU>COLELLI (V.); CAMPUS (P.); CONVERSI (D.); ORSINI (C.); CABIB (S.)</AU>
<AF>Dept. Psicologia, Center D.Bovet (CRIN), 'Sapienza' University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78/00185 Rome/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Fondazione Santa Lucia I.R.C.C.S., Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64/00143 Rome/Italie (3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Neurobiology of learning and memory : (Print); ISSN 1074-7427; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 111; Pp. 49-55; Bibl. 1 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Healthy subjects differ in the memory system they engage to learn dual-solution tasks. Both genotype and stress experience could contribute to this phenotypic variability. The present experiments tested whether the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum, the core nodes of two different memory systems, are differently involved in 24 h retention of a stress-associated memory in two genetically unrelated inbred strains of mice. Mice from both the C57BL/6J and the DBA/2J inbred strains showed progressive increase of immobility during 10 min exposure to forced swim (FS) and retrieved the acquired levels of immobility when tested 24 h later. The pattern of c-fos immunostaining promoted by FS revealed activation of a large number of brain areas in both strains, including CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus. However, only DBA/2J mice showed activation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). In addition, FS induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and CA1 and CA3 in C57BL/6J mice whereas it induced a positive correlation between c-fos expression in the amygdala and DLS in DBA/2J mice. Finally, temporary post-training inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus, by local infusion of lidocaine, prevented 24 h retention of immobility in C57BL/6J mice only, whereas inactivation of the DLS prevented retention in DBA/2J mice only. These findings support the view that genetic factors can determine whether the dorsal hippocampus or the DLS are selectively engaged to consolidate stress-related memory.</EA>
<CC>002A26C</CC>
<FD>Hippocampe; Corps strié; Consolidation; Génétique; Comparaison interindividuelle; Style cognitif; Style apprentissage; Apprentissage; Stress</FD>
<FG>Encéphale; Système nerveux central; Noyau gris central; Processus acquisition</FG>
<ED>Hippocampus; Corpus striatum; Consolidation; Genetics; Interindividual comparison; Cognitive style; Learning style; Learning; Stress</ED>
<EG>Encephalon; Central nervous system; Basal ganglion; Acquisition process</EG>
<SD>Hipocampo; Cuerpo estriado; Consolidación; Genética; Comparación interindividual; Estilo cognitivo; Estilo aprendizaje; Aprendizaje; Estrés</SD>
<LO>INIST-14380A.354000502742090070</LO>
<ID>14-0148246</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000020 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000020 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Lorraine
   |area=    InforLorV4
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:14-0148246
   |texte=   Either the dorsal hippocampus or the dorsolateral striatum is selectively involved in consolidation of forced swim-induced immobility depending on genetic background
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Jun 10 21:56:28 2019. Site generation: Fri Feb 25 15:29:27 2022