Serveur d'exploration sur la recherche en informatique en Lorraine

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures

Identifieur interne : 000168 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000167; suivant : 000169

Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures

Auteurs : Yannick Chevalier [France] ; Michael Rusinowitch [France]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:10-0147183

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Most of the decision procedures for symbolic analysis of protocols are limited to a fixed set of algebraic operators associated with a fixed intruder theory. Examples of such sets of operators comprise XOR, multiplication, abstract encryption/decryption. In this report we give an algorithm for combining decision procedures for arbitrary intruder theories with disjoint sets of operators, provided that solvability of ordered intruder constraints, a slight generalization of intruder constraints, can be decided in each theory. This is the case for most of the intruder theories for which a decision procedure has been given. In particular our result allows us to decide trace-based security properties of protocols that employ any combination of the above mentioned operators with a bounded number of sessions.


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0147183

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chevalier, Yannick" sort="Chevalier, Yannick" uniqKey="Chevalier Y" first="Yannick" last="Chevalier">Yannick Chevalier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>IRIT, Team LiLac, Université Paul Sabatier</s1>
<s2>Toulouse</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Occitanie (région administrative)</region>
<region type="old region">Midi-Pyrénées</region>
<settlement type="city">Toulouse</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rusinowitch, Michael" sort="Rusinowitch, Michael" uniqKey="Rusinowitch M" first="Michael" last="Rusinowitch">Michael Rusinowitch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Loria-INRIA Lorraine, Cassis Project</s1>
<s2>Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Grand Est</region>
<region type="old region">Lorraine (région)</region>
<settlement type="city">Nancy</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0147183</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0147183 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0147183</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000227</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000791</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000168</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chevalier, Yannick" sort="Chevalier, Yannick" uniqKey="Chevalier Y" first="Yannick" last="Chevalier">Yannick Chevalier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>IRIT, Team LiLac, Université Paul Sabatier</s1>
<s2>Toulouse</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Occitanie (région administrative)</region>
<region type="old region">Midi-Pyrénées</region>
<settlement type="city">Toulouse</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rusinowitch, Michael" sort="Rusinowitch, Michael" uniqKey="Rusinowitch M" first="Michael" last="Rusinowitch">Michael Rusinowitch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Loria-INRIA Lorraine, Cassis Project</s1>
<s2>Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Grand Est</region>
<region type="old region">Lorraine (région)</region>
<settlement type="city">Nancy</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Theoretical computer science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Theor. comput. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3975</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Theoretical computer science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Theor. comput. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-3975</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Algorithm</term>
<term>Bounded operator</term>
<term>Computer theory</term>
<term>Constraint</term>
<term>Cryptographic protocol</term>
<term>Decision analysis</term>
<term>Decision theory</term>
<term>Decryption</term>
<term>Encryption</term>
<term>Limit analysis</term>
<term>Multiplication</term>
<term>Security protocol</term>
<term>Set theory</term>
<term>Solvability</term>
<term>Trace</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Théorie décision</term>
<term>Analyse décision</term>
<term>Analyse limite</term>
<term>Multiplication</term>
<term>Décryptage</term>
<term>Algorithme</term>
<term>Théorie ensemble</term>
<term>Résolubilité</term>
<term>Contrainte</term>
<term>Trace</term>
<term>Opérateur borné</term>
<term>Informatique théorique</term>
<term>Union disjointe</term>
<term>Procédure décision</term>
<term>68P25</term>
<term>68Wxx</term>
<term>03Exx</term>
<term>Protocole sécurité</term>
<term>Chiffrement</term>
<term>Protocole cryptographique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most of the decision procedures for symbolic analysis of protocols are limited to a fixed set of algebraic operators associated with a fixed intruder theory. Examples of such sets of operators comprise XOR, multiplication, abstract encryption/decryption. In this report we give an algorithm for combining decision procedures for arbitrary intruder theories with disjoint sets of operators, provided that solvability of ordered intruder constraints, a slight generalization of intruder constraints, can be decided in each theory. This is the case for most of the intruder theories for which a decision procedure has been given. In particular our result allows us to decide trace-based security properties of protocols that employ any combination of the above mentioned operators with a bounded number of sessions.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0304-3975</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>TCSCDI</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Theor. comput. sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>411</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>10</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Security and Cryptography Foundations</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>CHEVALIER (Yannick)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>RUSINOWITCH (Michael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>YUNG (Moti)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>IRIT, Team LiLac, Université Paul Sabatier</s1>
<s2>Toulouse</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Loria-INRIA Lorraine, Cassis Project</s1>
<s2>Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01">
<s1>Google Research and Computer Science, Columbia University</s1>
<s2>10027 New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20>
<s1>1261-1282</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17243</s2>
<s5>354000190124430030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>31 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0147183</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Theoretical computer science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Most of the decision procedures for symbolic analysis of protocols are limited to a fixed set of algebraic operators associated with a fixed intruder theory. Examples of such sets of operators comprise XOR, multiplication, abstract encryption/decryption. In this report we give an algorithm for combining decision procedures for arbitrary intruder theories with disjoint sets of operators, provided that solvability of ordered intruder constraints, a slight generalization of intruder constraints, can be decided in each theory. This is the case for most of the intruder theories for which a decision procedure has been given. In particular our result allows us to decide trace-based security properties of protocols that employ any combination of the above mentioned operators with a bounded number of sessions.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001D02A08</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>001D02B07B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X">
<s0>001D02A05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="04" i2="X">
<s0>001A02A01E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Théorie décision</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decision theory</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Teoría decisión</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse décision</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decision analysis</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis decisión</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse limite</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Limit analysis</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis límite</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Multiplication</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Multiplication</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Multiplicación</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Décryptage</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decryption</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Desciframiento</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Algorithme</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Algorithm</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Algoritmo</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Théorie ensemble</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Set theory</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Teoría conjunto</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Résolubilité</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Solvability</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Resolubilidad</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Contrainte</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Constraint</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Coacción</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Trace</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Trace</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Traza</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Opérateur borné</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Bounded operator</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Operador acotado</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Informatique théorique</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer theory</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Informática teórica</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Union disjointe</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Procédure décision</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>71</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>68P25</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>72</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>68Wxx</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>73</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>03Exx</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>74</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Protocole sécurité</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Security protocol</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chiffrement</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Encryption</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Protocole cryptographique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>98</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cryptographic protocol</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>98</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>095</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
<pR>
<fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2005)</s1>
<s2>32</s2>
<s3>Lisboa PRT</s3>
<s4>2005-07-11</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>France</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Grand Est</li>
<li>Lorraine (région)</li>
<li>Midi-Pyrénées</li>
<li>Occitanie (région administrative)</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Nancy</li>
<li>Toulouse</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="France">
<region name="Occitanie (région administrative)">
<name sortKey="Chevalier, Yannick" sort="Chevalier, Yannick" uniqKey="Chevalier Y" first="Yannick" last="Chevalier">Yannick Chevalier</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Rusinowitch, Michael" sort="Rusinowitch, Michael" uniqKey="Rusinowitch M" first="Michael" last="Rusinowitch">Michael Rusinowitch</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000168 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000168 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Lorraine
   |area=    InforLorV4
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0147183
   |texte=   Symbolic protocol analysis in the union of disjoint intruder theories: Combining decision procedures
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Jun 10 21:56:28 2019. Site generation: Fri Feb 25 15:29:27 2022