Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies
Identifieur interne : 003532 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003531; suivant : 003533Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies
Auteurs : Laurent Andrey ; Olivier Festor ; Abdelkader Lahmadi ; Aiko Pras ; Jürgen Schönw LderSource :
- International Journal of Network Management [ 1055-7148 ] ; 2009-11.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Algorithm, Analyse, Andrey, Bandwidth, Bandwidth consumption, Benchmarking, Computer science, Copyright, Corba, Ethernet, Getbulk, Ieee, Ieee transactions, Injection rate, Injector, International conference, International journal, International symposium, Internet, Interworking device, John wiley sons, Large number, Management data, Management symposium, Mbit, Metrics, Mgmt, Mobile agents, Module, Network management, Network mgmt, Network operations, Networking, Node, Noms, Operational networks, Opnet, Performance analysis, Performance evaluation, Performance metrics, Performance studies, Performance study, Pras, Protocol, Pulldriven, Real networks, Research interests, Response time, Results show, Retrieval, Router, Scenario, Server, Service management, Simulation, Simulator, Single agent, Single manager, Snmp, Snmp performance, Snmp performance analysis, Snmp performance analysis studies, Snmp protocol, Snmpv1, Software engineering, Systems management, Workload.
Abstract
This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/nem.729
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title><author><name sortKey="Andrey, Laurent" sort="Andrey, Laurent" uniqKey="Andrey L" first="Laurent" last="Andrey">Laurent Andrey</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Festor, Olivier" sort="Festor, Olivier" uniqKey="Festor O" first="Olivier" last="Festor">Olivier Festor</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lahmadi, Abdelkader" sort="Lahmadi, Abdelkader" uniqKey="Lahmadi A" first="Abdelkader" last="Lahmadi">Abdelkader Lahmadi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pras, Aiko" sort="Pras, Aiko" uniqKey="Pras A" first="Aiko" last="Pras">Aiko Pras</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Twente, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schonw Lder, Jurgen" sort="Schonw Lder, Jurgen" uniqKey="Schonw Lder J" first="Jürgen" last="Schönw Lder">Jürgen Schönw Lder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Jacobs University Bremen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/nem.729</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003532</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003532</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title><author><name sortKey="Andrey, Laurent" sort="Andrey, Laurent" uniqKey="Andrey L" first="Laurent" last="Andrey">Laurent Andrey</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Festor, Olivier" sort="Festor, Olivier" uniqKey="Festor O" first="Olivier" last="Festor">Olivier Festor</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lahmadi, Abdelkader" sort="Lahmadi, Abdelkader" uniqKey="Lahmadi A" first="Abdelkader" last="Lahmadi">Abdelkader Lahmadi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pras, Aiko" sort="Pras, Aiko" uniqKey="Pras A" first="Aiko" last="Pras">Aiko Pras</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Twente, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schonw Lder, Jurgen" sort="Schonw Lder, Jurgen" uniqKey="Schonw Lder J" first="Jürgen" last="Schönw Lder">Jürgen Schönw Lder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Jacobs University Bremen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">International Journal of Network Management</title><title level="j" type="alt">INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT</title><idno type="ISSN">1055-7148</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1190</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="527">527</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="548">548</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">22</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-11">2009-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1055-7148</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1055-7148</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithm</term><term>Analyse</term><term>Andrey</term><term>Bandwidth</term><term>Bandwidth consumption</term><term>Benchmarking</term><term>Computer science</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Corba</term><term>Ethernet</term><term>Getbulk</term><term>Ieee</term><term>Ieee transactions</term><term>Injection rate</term><term>Injector</term><term>International conference</term><term>International journal</term><term>International symposium</term><term>Internet</term><term>Interworking device</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Large number</term><term>Management data</term><term>Management symposium</term><term>Mbit</term><term>Metrics</term><term>Mgmt</term><term>Mobile agents</term><term>Module</term><term>Network management</term><term>Network mgmt</term><term>Network operations</term><term>Networking</term><term>Node</term><term>Noms</term><term>Operational networks</term><term>Opnet</term><term>Performance analysis</term><term>Performance evaluation</term><term>Performance metrics</term><term>Performance studies</term><term>Performance study</term><term>Pras</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Pulldriven</term><term>Real networks</term><term>Research interests</term><term>Response time</term><term>Results show</term><term>Retrieval</term><term>Router</term><term>Scenario</term><term>Server</term><term>Service management</term><term>Simulation</term><term>Simulator</term><term>Single agent</term><term>Single manager</term><term>Snmp</term><term>Snmp performance</term><term>Snmp performance analysis</term><term>Snmp performance analysis studies</term><term>Snmp protocol</term><term>Snmpv1</term><term>Software engineering</term><term>Systems management</term><term>Workload</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>snmp</json:string><json:string>metrics</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>copyright</json:string><json:string>network management</json:string><json:string>ieee</json:string><json:string>mgmt</json:string><json:string>network mgmt</json:string><json:string>ethernet</json:string><json:string>scenario</json:string><json:string>pulldriven</json:string><json:string>injector</json:string><json:string>mbit</json:string><json:string>snmpv1</json:string><json:string>andrey</json:string><json:string>node</json:string><json:string>opnet</json:string><json:string>module</json:string><json:string>snmp performance</json:string><json:string>simulator</json:string><json:string>pras</json:string><json:string>snmp protocol</json:string><json:string>snmp performance analysis studies</json:string><json:string>bandwidth</json:string><json:string>internet</json:string><json:string>injection rate</json:string><json:string>router</json:string><json:string>workload</json:string><json:string>networking</json:string><json:string>benchmarking</json:string><json:string>management data</json:string><json:string>server</json:string><json:string>large number</json:string><json:string>noms</json:string><json:string>corba</json:string><json:string>getbulk</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>analyse</json:string><json:string>international symposium</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>computer science</json:string><json:string>bandwidth consumption</json:string><json:string>real networks</json:string><json:string>mobile agents</json:string><json:string>network operations</json:string><json:string>performance evaluation</json:string><json:string>operational networks</json:string><json:string>single agent</json:string><json:string>simulation</json:string><json:string>algorithm</json:string><json:string>results show</json:string><json:string>performance metrics</json:string><json:string>single manager</json:string><json:string>systems management</json:string><json:string>research interests</json:string><json:string>management symposium</json:string><json:string>response time</json:string><json:string>snmp performance analysis</json:string><json:string>ieee transactions</json:string><json:string>software engineering</json:string><json:string>interworking device</json:string><json:string>performance study</json:string><json:string>performance studies</json:string><json:string>service management</json:string><json:string>performance analysis</json:string><json:string>international conference</json:string><json:string>retrieval</json:string><json:string>snmp features</json:string><json:string>madynes research team</json:string><json:string>management application</json:string><json:string>ieee journal</json:string><json:string>mobile agents snmpv1</json:string><json:string>data types</json:string><json:string>jacobs university bremen</json:string><json:string>snmp operation</json:string><json:string>packet loss</json:string><json:string>associate professor</json:string><json:string>snmp device</json:string><json:string>different performance studies</json:string><json:string>performance benchmarking</json:string><json:string>snmp agent</json:string><json:string>management task</json:string><json:string>simple times</json:string><json:string>network</json:string><json:string>lossy networks</json:string><json:string>simulation measurement</json:string><json:string>measurement methodology</json:string><json:string>bandwidth usage</json:string><json:string>management system</json:string><json:string>bandwidth utilization</json:string><json:string>security support</json:string><json:string>opnet package</json:string><json:string>snmp protocol performance</json:string><json:string>opnet simulator</json:string><json:string>good examples</json:string><json:string>round trip delay</json:string><json:string>snmp manager</json:string><json:string>processing delay</json:string><json:string>management systems</json:string><json:string>response times</json:string><json:string>delivery delay</json:string><json:string>management algorithms</json:string><json:string>network level</json:string><json:string>memory usage</json:string><json:string>network bandwidth</json:string><json:string>overall management</json:string><json:string>other management protocols</json:string><json:string>fundamental scenarios</json:string><json:string>other approaches</json:string><json:string>network dimensions</json:string><json:string>snmp response times</json:string><json:string>particular agent</json:string><json:string>network management research group</json:string><json:string>internet research task force</json:string><json:string>snmp usage patterns</json:string><json:string>performance evaluation section</json:string><json:string>snmp implementation</json:string><json:string>anomaly detection</json:string><json:string>ieee communications magazine series</json:string><json:string>mbits ethernet</json:string><json:string>petri nets</json:string><json:string>wireless networks</json:string><json:string>multimedia networks</json:string><json:string>ieee internet</json:string><json:string>international workshop</json:string><json:string>snmp parameters</json:string><json:string>internet engineering task force</json:string><json:string>real network</json:string><json:string>simulation tools</json:string><json:string>network testbed</json:string><json:string>simulation studies</json:string><json:string>load injectors</json:string><json:string>such injectors</json:string><json:string>load injector</json:string><json:string>major networking conferences</json:string><json:string>injection thread</json:string><json:string>target value</json:string><json:string>protocol operations</json:string><json:string>management approaches</json:string><json:string>snmp usage</json:string><json:string>network management agents</json:string><json:string>ieee communications magazine</json:string><json:string>ieee computer society</json:string><json:string>simple network management protocol</json:string><json:string>computer communications</json:string><json:string>information technology</json:string><json:string>olivier festor</json:string><json:string>opnet modeler</json:string><json:string>technical report</json:string><json:string>computer networks</json:string><json:string>main papers</json:string><json:string>other management approaches</json:string><json:string>snmp activities</json:string><json:string>technical program</json:string><json:string>security management</json:string><json:string>network security</json:string><json:string>wiley</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Laurent Andrey</name><affiliations><json:string>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Olivier Festor</name><affiliations><json:string>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Abdelkader Lahmadi</name><affiliations><json:string>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Aiko Pras</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Twente, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jürgen Schönwälder</name><affiliations><json:string>Jacobs University Bremen, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>NEM729</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.956</score><pdfWordCount>9317</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>59997</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>22</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>567 x 737 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>163</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1101</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>International Journal of Network Management</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1190</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1055-7148</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1099-1190</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>NEM</json:string></publisherId><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>527</first><last>548</last><total>22</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - telecommunications</json:string><json:string>2 - computer science, information systems</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - applied sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - information & communication technologies</json:string><json:string>3 - networking & telecommunications</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Computer Networks and Communications</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Computer Science Applications</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - informatique, statistique et modelisations biomedicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/nem.729</json:string></doi><id>DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title><title level="a" type="short" xml:lang="en">SURVEY OF SNMP PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS STUDIES</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Laurent</forename><surname>Andrey</surname></persName><affiliation><address><addrLine>LORIA‐INRIA</addrLine><addrLine>Lorraine</addrLine><country key="FR">FRANCE</country><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Olivier</forename><surname>Festor</surname></persName><email>Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</email><affiliation><address><addrLine>LORIA‐INRIA</addrLine><addrLine>Lorraine</addrLine><country key="FR">FRANCE</country><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Abdelkader</forename><surname>Lahmadi</surname></persName><affiliation><address><addrLine>LORIA‐INRIA</addrLine><addrLine>Lorraine</addrLine><country key="FR">FRANCE</country><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Aiko</forename><surname>Pras</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName type="institution">University of Twente</orgName><address><country key="NL">NETHERLANDS</country><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Jürgen</forename><surname>Schönwälder</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName type="institution">Jacobs University Bremen</orgName><address><country key="DE">GERMANY</country><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/nem.729</idno><idno type="unit">NEM729</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:NEM.NEM729.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">International Journal of Network Management</title><title level="j" type="alt">INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT</title><idno type="pISSN">1055-7148</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1190</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1190</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/nem.v19:6</idno><idno type="product">NEM</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="527">527</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="548">548</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">22</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" style="graphical"><p>This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. <figure type="box"><media mimeType="image" url="urn:x-wiley:10557148:media:NEM729:ust002"></media><media mimeType="image/gif" url="" rendition="webLoRes"></media><media mimeType="image/jpeg" url="" rendition="webOriginal"></media><media mimeType="image/jpeg" url="" rendition="webHiRes"></media></figure></p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1190</doi><issn type="print">1055-7148</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1190</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="NEM"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT">International Journal of Network Management</title><title type="short">Int. J. Network Mgmt.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="60"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/nem.v19:6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-11">November/December 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="60" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/nem.729</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="NEM729"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="22"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2008-04-01"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2009-01-22"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2009-03-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-07-30"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-07-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-11-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">527</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">548</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:NEM.NEM729.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="55"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">SURVEY OF SNMP PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS STUDIES</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Laurent</givenNames><familyName>Andrey</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Olivier</givenNames><familyName>Festor</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Abdelkader</givenNames><familyName>Lahmadi</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au4" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Aiko</givenNames><familyName>Pras</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au5" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af3"><personName><givenNames>Jürgen</givenNames><familyName>Schönwälder</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="FR" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="NL" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Twente, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af3" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Jacobs University Bremen, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><abstract type="graphical" xml:lang="en"><p>This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. <blockFixed type="graphic"><mediaResourceGroup><mediaResource alt="image" eRights="yes" copyright="The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc." href="urn:x-wiley:10557148:media:NEM729:ust002"></mediaResource><mediaResource alt="thumbnail image" rendition="webLoRes" mimeType="image/gif" href=""></mediaResource><mediaResource alt="original image" rendition="webOriginal" mimeType="image/jpeg" href=""></mediaResource><mediaResource alt="magnified image" rendition="webHiRes" mimeType="image/jpeg" href=""></mediaResource></mediaResourceGroup></blockFixed></p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>SURVEY OF SNMP PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS STUDIES</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Laurent</namePart><namePart type="family">Andrey</namePart><affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Olivier</namePart><namePart type="family">Festor</namePart><affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: Olivier.Festor@inria.fr</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: INRIA, 615 rue du jardin botanique, Villers les Nancy 54602, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Abdelkader</namePart><namePart type="family">Lahmadi</namePart><affiliation>LORIA‐INRIA, Lorraine, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Aiko</namePart><namePart type="family">Pras</namePart><affiliation>University of Twente, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jürgen</namePart><namePart type="family">Schönwälder</namePart><affiliation>Jacobs University Bremen, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-11</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2008-04-01</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2009-03-02</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="references">55</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters. The reason for this diversity is the absence of a common framework for SNMP performance analysis. Without such a framework, results of SNMP‐related performance studies cannot easily be compared, extended or reused. It is therefore important to start a research activity to define such a framework. Such research activity should start from analysing previous studies on this topic to reveal their employed methods. In this survey we examine these studies by classifying and discussing them. We present techniques, approaches and metrics employed by these studies to quantify the performance of SNMP‐based applications. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><abstract type="graphical" lang="en">This paper provides a survey of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)‐related performance studies. Over the last 10 years, a variety of such studies have been published. Performance benchmarking of SNMP, like all benchmarking studies, is a non‐trivial task that requires substantial effort to be performed well and achieve its purpose. In many cases, existing studies have employed different techniques, metrics, scenarios and parameters.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>International Journal of Network Management</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Int. J. Network Mgmt.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1055-7148</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1190</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1190</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">NEM</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>527</start><end>548</end><total>22</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/nem.729</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">NEM729</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9Z10LH7V-F/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003532 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003532 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Lorraine
|area= InforLorV4
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DF998748AE004635F2A9EB70888BD784984E0512
|texte= Survey of SNMP performance analysis studies
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |