Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk
Identifieur interne : 002616 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002615; suivant : 002617Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk
Auteurs : Kelly D. GloverSource :
- Journal of Pragmatics [ 0378-2166 ] ; 2000.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Access point, Access points, Access road, Cambridge university press, Candidate outcome, Candidate outcomes, Deictic, Deictic orientation, Deictic reference, Deixis, Developer, Distal deixis, Distal reference, Distals, Dynamic nature, Elsevier science, Glover, Glover journal, Hanks, Hospital trust, Indexical, Indexical framework, Indexical ground, Indexical origo, John heritage, Jose state university, Language development, Negotiable, Negotiable context, Negotiable orientation, Other party, Particular candidate outcome, Place deixis, Planner, Planning department, Planning meeting, Politeness phenomena, Polity press, Pragmatic politeness phenomena, Pragmatics, Previous speaker, Problematic nature, Proximal, Proximal deixis, Proximal orientation, Proximal reference, Route directions, Same point, Satisfactory outcome, Senior planner, Sequential, Sequential placement, Social structure, Spatial orientation, Topic resolution, Unresolved, Unresolved issue, Unresolved status, Urban planning department.
Abstract
Abstract: This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a negotiable versus received orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title><author><name sortKey="Glover, Kelly D" sort="Glover, Kelly D" uniqKey="Glover K" first="Kelly D." last="Glover">Kelly D. Glover</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002616</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002616</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title><author><name sortKey="Glover, Kelly D" sort="Glover, Kelly D" uniqKey="Glover K" first="Kelly D." last="Glover">Kelly D. Glover</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Pragmatics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PRAGMA</title><idno type="ISSN">0378-2166</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000">2000</date><biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="915">915</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="926">926</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0378-2166</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0378-2166</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Access point</term><term>Access points</term><term>Access road</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Candidate outcome</term><term>Candidate outcomes</term><term>Deictic</term><term>Deictic orientation</term><term>Deictic reference</term><term>Deixis</term><term>Developer</term><term>Distal deixis</term><term>Distal reference</term><term>Distals</term><term>Dynamic nature</term><term>Elsevier science</term><term>Glover</term><term>Glover journal</term><term>Hanks</term><term>Hospital trust</term><term>Indexical</term><term>Indexical framework</term><term>Indexical ground</term><term>Indexical origo</term><term>John heritage</term><term>Jose state university</term><term>Language development</term><term>Negotiable</term><term>Negotiable context</term><term>Negotiable orientation</term><term>Other party</term><term>Particular candidate outcome</term><term>Place deixis</term><term>Planner</term><term>Planning department</term><term>Planning meeting</term><term>Politeness phenomena</term><term>Polity press</term><term>Pragmatic politeness phenomena</term><term>Pragmatics</term><term>Previous speaker</term><term>Problematic nature</term><term>Proximal</term><term>Proximal deixis</term><term>Proximal orientation</term><term>Proximal reference</term><term>Route directions</term><term>Same point</term><term>Satisfactory outcome</term><term>Senior planner</term><term>Sequential</term><term>Sequential placement</term><term>Social structure</term><term>Spatial orientation</term><term>Topic resolution</term><term>Unresolved</term><term>Unresolved issue</term><term>Unresolved status</term><term>Urban planning department</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a negotiable versus received orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>deixis</json:string><json:string>deictic</json:string><json:string>pragmatics</json:string><json:string>indexical</json:string><json:string>glover journal</json:string><json:string>glover</json:string><json:string>negotiable</json:string><json:string>sequential</json:string><json:string>distals</json:string><json:string>hanks</json:string><json:string>planner</json:string><json:string>proximal</json:string><json:string>distal deixis</json:string><json:string>cambridge university press</json:string><json:string>senior planner</json:string><json:string>deictic reference</json:string><json:string>planning meeting</json:string><json:string>hospital trust</json:string><json:string>access road</json:string><json:string>candidate outcome</json:string><json:string>spatial orientation</json:string><json:string>deictic orientation</json:string><json:string>indexical framework</json:string><json:string>candidate outcomes</json:string><json:string>urban planning department</json:string><json:string>social structure</json:string><json:string>indexical ground</json:string><json:string>negotiable orientation</json:string><json:string>particular candidate outcome</json:string><json:string>proximal reference</json:string><json:string>politeness phenomena</json:string><json:string>access points</json:string><json:string>access point</json:string><json:string>developer</json:string><json:string>unresolved</json:string><json:string>satisfactory outcome</json:string><json:string>elsevier science</json:string><json:string>indexical origo</json:string><json:string>dynamic nature</json:string><json:string>language development</json:string><json:string>topic resolution</json:string><json:string>pragmatic politeness phenomena</json:string><json:string>unresolved issue</json:string><json:string>jose state university</json:string><json:string>distal reference</json:string><json:string>route directions</json:string><json:string>unresolved status</json:string><json:string>planning department</json:string><json:string>proximal orientation</json:string><json:string>same point</json:string><json:string>other party</json:string><json:string>problematic nature</json:string><json:string>place deixis</json:string><json:string>previous speaker</json:string><json:string>john heritage</json:string><json:string>proximal deixis</json:string><json:string>sequential placement</json:string><json:string>polity press</json:string><json:string>negotiable context</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Kelly D. Glover</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Proximal and distal_deixis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Multifunctionality</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Talk-in-interaction</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Politeness phenomena</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Negotiation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Institutional talk</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a negotiable versus received orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.841</score><pdfWordCount>4933</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28474</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>504 x 713 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>159</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1070</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title><pii><json:string>S0378-2166(99)00078-8</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Pragmatics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0378-2166</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0378-2166(00)X0066-5</json:string></pii><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>915</first><last>926</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Linguistics and English Language</json:string><json:string>University of Durham, UK</json:string><json:string>San Jose State University</json:string><json:string>Each party</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>K.D. Glover</json:string><json:string>Levinson</json:string><json:string>Suzanne Wong</json:string><json:string>Jacob Mey</json:string><json:string>Kong English</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>CA</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Hanks, 1992</json:string><json:string>Drew and Heritage, 1992</json:string><json:string>Schegloff, 1991, 1992a,b</json:string><json:string>Brown and Levinson, 1978</json:string><json:string>1990, 1992, 1996</json:string><json:string>Atkinson and Heritage, 1984</json:string><json:string>Levinson, 1983</json:string><json:string>Glover and Grundy (1996)</json:string><json:string>Boden and Zimmerman, 1991</json:string><json:string>Anderson et al. (1987)</json:string><json:string>Hanks, 1992:51</json:string><json:string>[1987]</json:string><json:string>Sacks et al., 1974</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - linguistics</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>2 - communication & textual studies</json:string><json:string>3 - languages & linguistics</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Artificial Intelligence</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Linguistics and Language</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string><json:string>3 - Language and Linguistics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8</json:string></doi><id>A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><licence><p>elsevier</p></licence></availability><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M"></p><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note>The substance of this paper is based on work conducted for my Ph.D study completed in 1996. I would like to thank my dissertation supervisor, Peter Grundy, for his careful assistance and ongoing support of this work: the paper is a direct result of discussions with him. I would also like to thank my external examiners, Jacob Mey and Suzanne Wong Scollon, for their very useful comments and insightful feedback during the viva. All failings are, of course, my own. Presentation of this paper at the First International Colloquium on Deixis in Lexington, Kentucky was made possible with funds provided by the Department of Linguistics and English Language at the University of Durham, UK.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Kelly D.</forename><surname>Glover</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8</idno><idno type="PII">S0378-2166(99)00078-8</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Pragmatics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PRAGMA</title><idno type="pISSN">0378-2166</idno><idno type="PII">S0378-2166(00)X0066-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000"></date><biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="915">915</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="926">926</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a negotiable versus received orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Proximal and distal_deixis</term></item><item><term>Multifunctionality</term></item><item><term>Talk-in-interaction</term></item><item><term>Politeness phenomena</term></item><item><term>Negotiation</term></item><item><term>Institutional talk</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1999-07-05">Modified</change><change when="2000">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>PRAGMA</jid><aid>99000788</aid><ce:pii>S0378-2166(99)00078-8</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="2000"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>☆</ce:label><ce:note-para>The substance of this paper is based on work conducted for my Ph.D study completed in 1996. I would like to thank my dissertation supervisor, Peter Grundy, for his careful assistance and ongoing support of this work: the paper is a direct result of discussions with him. I would also like to thank my external examiners, Jacob Mey and Suzanne Wong Scollon, for their very useful comments and insightful feedback during the viva. All failings are, of course, my own. Presentation of this paper at the First International Colloquium on Deixis in Lexington, Kentucky was made possible with funds provided by the Department of Linguistics and English Language at the University of Durham, UK.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title>Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Kelly D.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Glover</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="22" month="2" year="1999"></ce:date-received><ce:date-revised day="5" month="7" year="1999"></ce:date-revised><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a <ce:italic>negotiable</ce:italic> versus <ce:italic>received</ce:italic> orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Proximal and distal_deixis</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Multifunctionality</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Talk-in-interaction</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Politeness phenomena</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Negotiation</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Institutional talk</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kelly D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Glover</namePart><affiliation>Department of Linguistics and Language Development, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000</dateIssued><dateModified encoding="w3cdtf">1999-07-05</dateModified><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: This paper examines how the choice between proximal and distal deixis may reveal a speaker's attitudinal orientation toward the referent being invoked. The methodology accounts for how these forms are used on a moment by moment basis during naturally occurring interaction; namely, a meeting between an urban planning department and a national developing company in which a planning application is being negotiated. In particular, the study focuses on how the interactants' use of place deixis has less to do with spatial orientation than with such contexts as topic resolution and pragmatic politeness phenomena. The choice between proximals and distals is seen to parallel a negotiable versus received orientation respectively; a dichotomy which aims to show the relationship between a speaker's attitude toward the object of reference and its sequential placement within the talk. As such, the analysis examines the inherent interaction between a traditional pragmatic category, such as deixis, and a sequentially determined context, such as turn structure.</abstract><note>The substance of this paper is based on work conducted for my Ph.D study completed in 1996. I would like to thank my dissertation supervisor, Peter Grundy, for his careful assistance and ongoing support of this work: the paper is a direct result of discussions with him. I would also like to thank my external examiners, Jacob Mey and Suzanne Wong Scollon, for their very useful comments and insightful feedback during the viva. All failings are, of course, my own. Presentation of this paper at the First International Colloquium on Deixis in Lexington, Kentucky was made possible with funds provided by the Department of Linguistics and English Language at the University of Durham, UK.</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Proximal and distal_deixis</topic><topic>Multifunctionality</topic><topic>Talk-in-interaction</topic><topic>Politeness phenomena</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Institutional talk</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Pragmatics</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>PRAGMA</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0378-2166</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0378-2166(00)X0066-5</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><number>32</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>7</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>855</start><end>1085</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>915</start><end>926</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00078-8</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0378-2166(99)00078-8</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-Q42FQHJ9-7/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002616 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002616 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Lorraine
|area= InforLorV4
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A1D50A204D9329929B83128F53C6758E2F1FDF47
|texte= Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |