ChansonRolandV7, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000075

Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest

Identifieur interne : 000075 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000074; suivant : 000076

Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest

Auteurs : Miranda Griffin

Source :

Neophilologus [ 0028-2677 ] ; 2004.

RBID : Francis:523-05-10523

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- France, Siècle 13, Charlemagne, Arthur, Inceste, Spectre, Péché, Tradition orale, Vulgate arthurienne, Monarque.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Arthur, Century 13, Charlemagne, France, Incest, Monarch, Oral tradition, Sin, Spectre, Vulgate Cycle.

Abstract

One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0028-2677`
A03		`1`		`@0 Neophilologus`
A05				`@2 88`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 GRIFFIN (Miranda)`
A14	`01`			`@2 11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 499-519`
A21				`@1 2004`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 25608 @5 354000114684110020`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 523-05-10523`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Neophilologus`
A66	`01`			`@0 NLD`
A99				`@0 1 p.1/2 ref. et notes`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.
C02	`01`	`I`		`@0 523165 @1 III`
C02	`02`	`I`		`@0 523`
C03	`01`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 France @2 NG @5 01`
C03	`01`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 France @2 NG @5 01`
C03	`02`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Siècle 13 @2 ND @5 02`
C03	`02`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Century 13 @2 ND @5 02`
C03	`03`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Charlemagne @5 03`
C03	`03`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Charlemagne @5 03`
C03	`04`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Arthur @2 NF @5 04`
C03	`04`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Arthur @2 NF @5 04`
C03	`05`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Inceste @5 05`
C03	`05`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Incest @5 05`
C03	`06`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Spectre @5 06`
C03	`06`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Spectre @5 06`
C03	`07`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Péché @5 07`
C03	`07`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Sin @5 07`
C03	`08`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Tradition orale @5 08`
C03	`08`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Oral tradition @5 08`
C03	`09`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Vulgate arthurienne @2 NF @2 FA @5 09`
C03	`09`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Vulgate Cycle @2 NF @2 FA @5 09`
C03	`10`	`I`	`FRE`	`@0 Monarque @5 10`
C03	`10`	`I`	`ENG`	`@0 Monarch @5 10`
N21				`@1 283`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 523-05-10523 INIST
ET :	Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest
AU :	GRIFFIN (Miranda)
AF :	11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Neophilologus; ISSN 0028-2677; Pays-Bas; Da. 2004; Vol. 88; No. 4; Pp. 499-519
LA :	Anglais
EA :	One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.
CC :	523165; 523
FD :	France; Siècle 13; Charlemagne; Arthur; Inceste; Spectre; Péché; Tradition orale; Vulgate arthurienne; Monarque
ED :	France; Century 13; Charlemagne; Arthur; Incest; Spectre; Sin; Oral tradition; Vulgate Cycle; Monarch
LO :	INIST-25608.354000114684110020
ID :	523

Links to Exploration step

Francis:523-05-10523

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest</title>
<author><name sortKey="Griffin, Miranda" sort="Griffin, Miranda" uniqKey="Griffin M" first="Miranda" last="Griffin">Miranda Griffin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s2>11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">523-05-10523</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 523-05-10523 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:523-05-10523</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000075</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest</title>
<author><name sortKey="Griffin, Miranda" sort="Griffin, Miranda" uniqKey="Griffin M" first="Miranda" last="Griffin">Miranda Griffin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s2>11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Neophilologus</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neophilologus</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Neophilologus</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neophilologus</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Arthur</term>
<term>Century 13</term>
<term>Charlemagne</term>
<term>France</term>
<term>Incest</term>
<term>Monarch</term>
<term>Oral tradition</term>
<term>Sin</term>
<term>Spectre</term>
<term>Vulgate Cycle</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term>
<term>Siècle 13</term>
<term>Charlemagne</term>
<term>Arthur</term>
<term>Inceste</term>
<term>Spectre</term>
<term>Péché</term>
<term>Tradition orale</term>
<term>Vulgate arthurienne</term>
<term>Monarque</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0028-2677</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Neophilologus</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>88</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GRIFFIN (Miranda)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s2>11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>499-519</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>25608</s2>
<s5>354000114684110020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>523-05-10523</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Neophilologus</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fA99><s0>1 p.1/2 ref. et notes</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="I"><s0>523165</s0>
<s1>III</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="I"><s0>523</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>France</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>France</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Siècle 13</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Century 13</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Charlemagne</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Charlemagne</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Arthur</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Arthur</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Inceste</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Incest</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Spectre</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Spectre</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Péché</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Sin</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Tradition orale</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Oral tradition</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Vulgate arthurienne</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Vulgate Cycle</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="I" l="FRE"><s0>Monarque</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="I" l="ENG"><s0>Monarch</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>283</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 523-05-10523 INIST</NO>
<ET>Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest</ET>
<AU>GRIFFIN (Miranda)</AU>
<AF>11, Armitage Way, Cambridge CB4 2UE/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Neophilologus; ISSN 0028-2677; Pays-Bas; Da. 2004; Vol. 88; No. 4; Pp. 499-519</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>One difficulty in writing about the incest inherent in the French medieval tales of Charlemagne and Arthur is that one inevitably finds oneself employing vocabulary of rumour and supposition. Incest in many texts concerning both monarchs is a kind of ghost: a presence which haunts the text without being entirely present, an unspoken allegation written between the lines of literature and hanging in the air of oral tradition, hinting at an unknowable past and crying out for an explanation some time in the future. In this article, I focus on modern critical articulations of the spectral in order to bring the nebulous sin with which Arthur and Charlemagne are accused into sharper focus. Derrida theorises the presence of the spectre, which is only ever detected rather than perceived, since it can only exist in a plane beyond human vision or chronology. In Butler's terms, a prohibition instigates and maintains the spectre of its transgression. These two formulations of the spectral illuminate incest in the literary traditions of Charlemagne and Arthur, figured as it is by writing which cannot be incorporated into the written narrative, but which is nevertheless crucial to that narrative, and can only be seen with the benefit of hindsight.</EA>
<CC>523165; 523</CC>
<FD>France; Siècle 13; Charlemagne; Arthur; Inceste; Spectre; Péché; Tradition orale; Vulgate arthurienne; Monarque</FD>
<ED>France; Century 13; Charlemagne; Arthur; Incest; Spectre; Sin; Oral tradition; Vulgate Cycle; Monarch</ED>
<LO>INIST-25608.354000114684110020</LO>
<ID>523</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    ChansonRoland
   |area=    ChansonRolandV7
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:523-05-10523
   |texte=   Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39.
Data generation: Thu Mar 21 08:12:28 2024. Site generation: Thu Mar 21 08:18:57 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur la Chanson de Roland
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur la Chanson de Roland

Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest

Writing out the sin: Arthur, Charlemagne and the spectre of incest

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri