Serveur d'exploration sur la Chanson de Roland

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend

Identifieur interne : 000013 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000012; suivant : 000014

Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend

Auteurs : Constant J. Mews

Source :

RBID : Francis:11-0404262

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0304-4181
A03   1    @0 J. mediev. hist. : (Print)
A05       @2 37
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend
A11 01  1    @1 MEWS (Constant J.)
A14 01      @1 School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University @2 VIC 3800 @3 AUS @Z 1 aut.
A20       @1 125-144
A21       @1 2011
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 23246 @5 354000191638240010
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A47 01  1    @0 11-0404262
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of medieval history : (Print)
A66 01      @0 GBR
A99       @0 ref. et notes dissem.
C01 01    ENG  @0 This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.
C02 01  R    @0 527964 @1 IV
C02 02  R    @0 527
C03 01  R  FRE  @0 Grégoire I @2 NF @2 FA @5 01
C03 01  R  ENG  @0 Gregory I @2 NF @2 FA @5 01
C03 02  R  FRE  @0 Moyen Âge @2 ND @5 02
C03 02  R  ENG  @0 Middle Ages @2 ND @5 02
C03 03  R  FRE  @0 Liturgie romaine @5 03
C03 03  R  ENG  @0 Roman liturgy @5 03
C03 04  R  FRE  @0 Règle bénédictine @2 NB @5 04
C03 04  R  ENG  @0 Benedictine Rule @2 NB @5 04
C03 05  R  FRE  @0 Réforme liturgique @5 05
C03 05  R  ENG  @0 Liturgical Reformation @5 05
C03 06  R  FRE  @0 Relique @5 06
C03 06  R  ENG  @0 Relic @5 06
C03 07  R  FRE  @0 Monachisme @5 07
C03 07  R  ENG  @0 Monasticism @5 07
C03 08  R  FRE  @0 Vitalien @4 INC @5 31
N21       @1 276

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : FRANCIS 11-0404262 INIST
ET : Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend
AU : MEWS (Constant J.)
AF : School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University/VIC 3800/Australie (1 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of medieval history : (Print); ISSN 0304-4181; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2011; Vol. 37; No. 2; Pp. 125-144
LA : Anglais
EA : This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.
CC : 527964; 527
FD : Grégoire I; Moyen Âge; Liturgie romaine; Règle bénédictine; Réforme liturgique; Relique; Monachisme; Vitalien
ED : Gregory I; Middle Ages; Roman liturgy; Benedictine Rule; Liturgical Reformation; Relic; Monasticism
LO : INIST-23246.354000191638240010
ID : 11-0404262

Links to Exploration step

Francis:11-0404262

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mews, Constant J" sort="Mews, Constant J" uniqKey="Mews C" first="Constant J." last="Mews">Constant J. Mews</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University</s1>
<s2>VIC 3800</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0404262</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 11-0404262 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:11-0404262</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000013</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mews, Constant J" sort="Mews, Constant J" uniqKey="Mews C" first="Constant J." last="Mews">Constant J. Mews</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University</s1>
<s2>VIC 3800</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of medieval history : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. mediev. hist. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-4181</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of medieval history : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. mediev. hist. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0304-4181</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Benedictine Rule</term>
<term>Gregory I</term>
<term>Liturgical Reformation</term>
<term>Middle Ages</term>
<term>Monasticism</term>
<term>Relic</term>
<term>Roman liturgy</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Grégoire I</term>
<term>Moyen Âge</term>
<term>Liturgie romaine</term>
<term>Règle bénédictine</term>
<term>Réforme liturgique</term>
<term>Relique</term>
<term>Monachisme</term>
<term>Vitalien</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0304-4181</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. mediev. hist. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>37</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>MEWS (Constant J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University</s1>
<s2>VIC 3800</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>125-144</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>23246</s2>
<s5>354000191638240010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>11-0404262</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of medieval history : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fA99>
<s0>ref. et notes dissem.</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="R">
<s0>527964</s0>
<s1>IV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="R">
<s0>527</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Grégoire I</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Gregory I</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Moyen Âge</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Middle Ages</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Liturgie romaine</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Roman liturgy</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Règle bénédictine</s0>
<s2>NB</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Benedictine Rule</s0>
<s2>NB</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Réforme liturgique</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Liturgical Reformation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Relique</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Relic</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Monachisme</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="R" l="ENG">
<s0>Monasticism</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="R" l="FRE">
<s0>Vitalien</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>276</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>FRANCIS 11-0404262 INIST</NO>
<ET>Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend</ET>
<AU>MEWS (Constant J.)</AU>
<AF>School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University/VIC 3800/Australie (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of medieval history : (Print); ISSN 0304-4181; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2011; Vol. 37; No. 2; Pp. 125-144</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This paper relates the evolution of Gregory the Great's reputation as creator of the Roman liturgy to the slow process by which the Rule of Benedict acquired authority within monasticism in the seventh and eighth centuries. It argues that Gregory composed the Dialogues to promote ascetic values within the Church, but that this work did not begin to circulate in Spain and then Gaul until the 630s, precisely when Gregory's known interest in liturgical reform is first attested in Rome. The letters of Pope Vitalian (657-72) provide hitherto unnoticed testimony to the theft of Benedict's relics by monks of Fleury c.660, marking a new stage in the evolution of monastic culture in Gaul. The paper also argues that the Ordo Romanus XIX is not a Frankish composition from the second half of the eighth century (as Andrieu claimed), but provides important evidence for the Rule being observed at St Peter's, Rome, in the late seventh century. While Gregory was interested in liturgical reform, he never enforced any particular observance on the broader church,just as he never imposed any particular rule. By the time of Charlemagne, however, Gregory had been transformed into an ideal figure imposing uniformity of liturgical observance, as well as mandating the Rule of Benedict within monasticism. Yet the church of the Lateran, mother church of the city of Rome, continued to maintain its own liturgy and ancient form of chant, which it claimed had been composed by Pope Vitalian, even in the thirteenth century.</EA>
<CC>527964; 527</CC>
<FD>Grégoire I; Moyen Âge; Liturgie romaine; Règle bénédictine; Réforme liturgique; Relique; Monachisme; Vitalien</FD>
<ED>Gregory I; Middle Ages; Roman liturgy; Benedictine Rule; Liturgical Reformation; Relic; Monasticism</ED>
<LO>INIST-23246.354000191638240010</LO>
<ID>11-0404262</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    ChansonRoland
   |area=    ChansonRolandV7
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:11-0404262
   |texte=   Gregory the Great, the Rule of Benedict and Roman liturgy: the evolution of a legend
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39.
Data generation: Thu Mar 21 08:12:28 2024. Site generation: Thu Mar 21 08:18:57 2024