DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.
Identifieur interne : 001B65 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B64; suivant : 001B66DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.
Auteurs : Maziar BehroozSource :
- International Journal of Middle East Studies [ 0020-7438 ] ; 2001-11.
Abstract
In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.
Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0020743801414073
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFCLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title><author><name sortKey="Behrooz, Maziar" sort="Behrooz, Maziar" uniqKey="Behrooz M" first="Maziar" last="Behrooz">Maziar Behrooz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFC</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1017/S0020743801414073</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B65</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B65</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title><author><name sortKey="Behrooz, Maziar" sort="Behrooz, Maziar" uniqKey="Behrooz M" first="Maziar" last="Behrooz">Maziar Behrooz</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Middle East Studies</title><idno type="ISSN">0020-7438</idno><idno type="eISSN">1471-6380</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-11">2001-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="651">651</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="652">652</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0020-7438</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0020-7438</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>cambridge</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Maziar Behrooz</name></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>book-review</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.92</score><pdfWordCount>34490</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>198028</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>56</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>160</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1013</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title><pii><json:string>S0020743801414073</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>book-reviews</json:string></genre><host><title>International Journal of Middle East Studies</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><issn><json:string>0020-7438</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1471-6380</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>MES</json:string></publisherId><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>651</first><last>652</last><total>2</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - area studies</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - social sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - cultural studies</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Sociology and Political Science</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string><json:string>3 - History</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Geography, Planning and Development</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1017/S0020743801414073</json:string></doi><id>905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York, USA</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>© 2001 Cambridge University Press</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p></availability><date>2002-05-20</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="book-reviews" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-PBH5VBM9-4">book-reviews</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Maziar</forename><surname>Behrooz</surname></persName></author><idno type="istex">905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0020743801414073</idno><idno type="PII">S0020743801414073</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">International Journal of Middle East Studies</title><idno type="pISSN">0020-7438</idno><idno type="eISSN">1471-6380</idno><idno type="publisher-id">MES</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-11"></date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="651">651</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="652">652</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002-05-20</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract style="text-abstract"><p>In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-05-20">Created</change><change when="2001-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" URI="JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article dtd-version="1.0" article-type="book-review"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Middle East Studies</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Int. J. Middle East Stud.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1471-6380</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0020-7438</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>New York, USA</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0020743801414073</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0020743801414073</article-id><title-group><article-title>D<sc>ARIUSH</sc> Z<sc>AHEDI</sc>, <italic>The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:
Indications of Regime Instability</italic> (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00
cloth.</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib><name><surname>Behrooz</surname><given-names>Maziar</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>5</month><year>2002</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>11</month><year>2001</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>651</fpage><lpage>652</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2001 Cambridge University Press</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract abstract-type="text-abstract"><p>In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training
guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts,
deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not
venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which
may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward
study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data
are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily
turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions,
of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example.
However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the
Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.</p></abstract><counts><page-count count="2"></page-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pdf</meta-name><meta-value>S0020743801414073a.pdf</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now: Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00 cloth.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Maziar</namePart><namePart type="family">Behrooz</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="book-reviews" displayLabel="book-review" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-PBH5VBM9-4">book-reviews</genre><originInfo><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">New York, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-11</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2002-05-20</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract type="text-abstract">In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>International Journal of Middle East Studies</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0020-7438</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1471-6380</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">MES</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>33</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>651</start><end>652</end><total>2</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0020743801414073</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0020743801414073</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2001 Cambridge University Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>© 2001 Cambridge University Press</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-QN301M15-W/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B65 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B65 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= ChansonRoland
|area= ChansonRolandV7
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:905F4192D562A101FA5D4D1A93201CE779570DFC
|texte= DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |