Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders
Identifieur interne : 000390 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000389; suivant : 000391Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders
Auteurs : Margaret K. Nelson [États-Unis] ; Rosanna Hertz [États-Unis] ; Wendy Kramer [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of Law and the Biosciences [ 2053-9711 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
This paper discusses the attitudes of three groups of stakeholders in the world of assisted reproduction gamete donors, parents who use donated gamete, and offspring conceived with donated gametes with respect to the two issues of donor anonymity and limits on the number of offspring a single donor can produce. The data are drawn from on-line surveys which were made available between May 12, 2104 and August 15, 2014 to gamete donors, donor-conceived offspring, and parents who used donated gametes to conceive. A total of 325 donors (176 egg donors; 149 sperm donors) responded to the survey as did 2134 parents and 419 offspring. The data show that offspring are more opposed to donor anonymity than are parents and donors. Among offspring opposition to anonymity grows as they age. On the other hand, parents are most in favor of limits on numbers of offspring produced by a single donor. Parents worry about health and accidental contact between people conceived from the same donor.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsv045
PubMed: 27774232
PubMed Central: 5033425
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000390
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5033425Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders</title><author><name sortKey="Nelson, Margaret K" sort="Nelson, Margaret K" uniqKey="Nelson M" first="Margaret K." last="Nelson">Margaret K. Nelson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hertz, Rosanna" sort="Hertz, Rosanna" uniqKey="Hertz R" first="Rosanna" last="Hertz">Rosanna Hertz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Departments of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Departments of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kramer, Wendy" sort="Kramer, Wendy" uniqKey="Kramer W" first="Wendy" last="Kramer">Wendy Kramer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff3">Donor Sibling Registry, Nederland, CO 80466, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Donor Sibling Registry, Nederland, CO 80466</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">27774232</idno><idno type="pmc">5033425</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033425</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:5033425</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/jlb/lsv045</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000390</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000390</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders</title><author><name sortKey="Nelson, Margaret K" sort="Nelson, Margaret K" uniqKey="Nelson M" first="Margaret K." last="Nelson">Margaret K. Nelson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hertz, Rosanna" sort="Hertz, Rosanna" uniqKey="Hertz R" first="Rosanna" last="Hertz">Rosanna Hertz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Departments of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Departments of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kramer, Wendy" sort="Kramer, Wendy" uniqKey="Kramer W" first="Wendy" last="Kramer">Wendy Kramer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff3">Donor Sibling Registry, Nederland, CO 80466, USA</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Donor Sibling Registry, Nederland, CO 80466</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Law and the Biosciences</title><idno type="eISSN">2053-9711</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>This paper discusses the attitudes of three groups of stakeholders in the world of assisted reproduction gamete donors, parents who use donated gamete, and offspring conceived with donated gametes with respect to the two issues of donor anonymity and limits on the number of offspring a single donor can produce. The data are drawn from on-line surveys which were made available between May 12, 2104 and August 15, 2014 to gamete donors, donor-conceived offspring, and parents who used donated gametes to conceive. A total of 325 donors (176 egg donors; 149 sperm donors) responded to the survey as did 2134 parents and 419 offspring. The data show that offspring are more opposed to donor anonymity than are parents and donors. Among offspring opposition to anonymity grows as they age. On the other hand, parents are most in favor of limits on numbers of offspring produced by a single donor. Parents worry about health and accidental contact between people conceived from the same donor.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Law Biosci</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Law Biosci</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">jlb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jlb</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Law and the Biosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2053-9711</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27774232</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5033425</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jlb/lsv045</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>Margaret K.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1a">†</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hertz</surname><given-names>Rosanna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1b">‡</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>Wendy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1c">§</xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA</aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label>Departments of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA</aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label>Donor Sibling Registry, Nederland, CO 80466, USA</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>*</label>Corresponding author. E-mail: <email>mnelson@middlebury.edu</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>10</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><month>4</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><license license-type="creative-commons" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact <email>journals.permissions@oup.com</email></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:title="pdf" xlink:href="lsv045.pdf"></self-uri><abstract><p>This paper discusses the attitudes of three groups of stakeholders in the world of assisted reproduction gamete donors, parents who use donated gamete, and offspring conceived with donated gametes with respect to the two issues of donor anonymity and limits on the number of offspring a single donor can produce. The data are drawn from on-line surveys which were made available between May 12, 2104 and August 15, 2014 to gamete donors, donor-conceived offspring, and parents who used donated gametes to conceive. A total of 325 donors (176 egg donors; 149 sperm donors) responded to the survey as did 2134 parents and 419 offspring. The data show that offspring are more opposed to donor anonymity than are parents and donors. Among offspring opposition to anonymity grows as they age. On the other hand, parents are most in favor of limits on numbers of offspring produced by a single donor. Parents worry about health and accidental contact between people conceived from the same donor.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>anonymity</kwd><kwd>assisted reproduction technology</kwd><kwd>gamete donors</kwd><kwd>limits</kwd></kwd-group><counts><page-count count="29"></page-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>cover-date</meta-name><meta-value>April 2016</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000390 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000390 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:5033425
|texte= Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27774232" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OpenAccessBelV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |