OpenAccessBelV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000040

Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"

Identifieur interne : 000040 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000039; suivant : 000041

Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"

Auteurs : L. Egghe

Source :

Scientometrics : (Print) [ 0138-9130 ] ; 2011.

RBID : Pascal:11-0425290

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Recherche scientifique, Communication scientifique, Evaluation interpair, Libre accès.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Open access, Peer review, Scientific communication, Scientific research.

Abstract

In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0138-9130`
A02	`01`			`@0 SCNTDX`
A03		`1`		`@0 Scientometrics : (Print)`
A05				`@2 88`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 EGGHE (L.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35 @2 2000 Antwerpen @3 BEL @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 663-667`
A21				`@1 2011`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 19049 @5 354000190479360220`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1/2 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 11-0425290`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Scientometrics : (Print)`
A66	`01`			`@0 NLD`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	`@0 In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.`
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 001A01A02`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 001A01H03`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Recherche scientifique @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Scientific research @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Investigación científica @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Communication scientifique @5 05`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Scientific communication @5 05`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Comunicación científica @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Evaluation interpair @5 06`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Peer review @5 06`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Evaluacíon interpares @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Libre accès @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Open access @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Libre acceso @5 07`
N21				`@1 290`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 11-0425290 INIST
ET :	Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"
AU :	EGGHE (L.)
AF :	Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35/2000 Antwerpen/Belgique (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Scientometrics : (Print); ISSN 0138-9130; Coden SCNTDX; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 88; No. 2; Pp. 663-667; Bibl. 1/2 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.
CC :	001A01A02; 001A01H03
FD :	Recherche scientifique; Communication scientifique; Evaluation interpair; Libre accès
ED :	Scientific research; Scientific communication; Peer review; Open access
SD :	Investigación científica; Comunicación científica; Evaluacíon interpares; Libre acceso
LO :	INIST-19049.354000190479360220
ID :	11-0425290

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0425290

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"</title>
<author><name sortKey="Egghe, L" sort="Egghe, L" uniqKey="Egghe L" first="L." last="Egghe">L. Egghe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35</s1>
<s2>2000 Antwerpen</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0425290</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0425290 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0425290</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000040</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"</title>
<author><name sortKey="Egghe, L" sort="Egghe, L" uniqKey="Egghe L" first="L." last="Egghe">L. Egghe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35</s1>
<s2>2000 Antwerpen</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0138-9130</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0138-9130</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Open access</term>
<term>Peer review</term>
<term>Scientific communication</term>
<term>Scientific research</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Recherche scientifique</term>
<term>Communication scientifique</term>
<term>Evaluation interpair</term>
<term>Libre accès</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0138-9130</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>SCNTDX</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Scientometrics : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>88</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>EGGHE (L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35</s1>
<s2>2000 Antwerpen</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>663-667</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19049</s2>
<s5>354000190479360220</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0425290</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Scientometrics : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>001A01A02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>001A01H03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Recherche scientifique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Scientific research</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Investigación científica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Communication scientifique</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Scientific communication</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Comunicación científica</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation interpair</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Peer review</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluacíon interpares</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Libre accès</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Open access</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Libre acceso</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>290</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0425290 INIST</NO>
<ET>Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"</ET>
<AU>EGGHE (L.)</AU>
<AF>Universiteit Antwerpen (UA), Stadscampus, Venusstraat 35/2000 Antwerpen/Belgique (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Scientometrics : (Print); ISSN 0138-9130; Coden SCNTDX; Pays-Bas; Da. 2011; Vol. 88; No. 2; Pp. 663-667; Bibl. 1/2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In this short communication we give critical comments on the paper of Perakakis et al. (Scientometrics 85(2):553-559, 2010) on "Natural selection of academic papers". The criticism mainly focusses on their unbalanced criticism of peer review and their negative evaluation of the link of peer review with commercial publishing.</EA>
<CC>001A01A02; 001A01H03</CC>
<FD>Recherche scientifique; Communication scientifique; Evaluation interpair; Libre accès</FD>
<ED>Scientific research; Scientific communication; Peer review; Open access</ED>
<SD>Investigación científica; Comunicación científica; Evaluacíon interpares; Libre acceso</SD>
<LO>INIST-19049.354000190479360220</LO>
<ID>11-0425290</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000040 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000040 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0425290
   |texte=   Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024

	Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"

Problems with "natural selection of academic papers"

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri