Public Debate on the Future of the European Union: A Viable Legitimising Strategy?
Identifieur interne : 000699 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000698; suivant : 000700Public Debate on the Future of the European Union: A Viable Legitimising Strategy?
Auteurs : Lars Hoffmann ; Elizabeth MonaghanSource :
- Politics [ 0263-3957 ] ; 2011-10.
Abstract
In this article we analyse the phenomenon of public debate on the future of Europe which has been become a preferred tool of EU policymakers over the last decade. We assess the potential legitimacy benefits of such a public debate process and examine in detail two case studies: the Convention on the Future of Europe and the Debate Europe website. We compare these two public debates with regard to their composition, objectives and working procedures. Our findings show that public debate is no panacea for the EU's ongoing legitimacy‐related problems and they also point to general challenges for citizens' involvement in the ongoing European integration process.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2011.01413.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B70AE74C669ED106CE4A750B450EE2255AA91778Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Public Debate on the Future of the European Union: A Viable Legitimising Strategy?</title><author><name sortKey="Hoffmann, Lars" sort="Hoffmann, Lars" uniqKey="Hoffmann L" first="Lars" last="Hoffmann">Lars Hoffmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monaghan, Elizabeth" sort="Monaghan, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Monaghan E" first="Elizabeth" last="Monaghan">Elizabeth Monaghan</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B70AE74C669ED106CE4A750B450EE2255AA91778</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9256.2011.01413.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B70AE74C669ED106CE4A750B450EE2255AA91778/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D11</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D02</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000699</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Public Debate on the Future of the European Union: A Viable Legitimising Strategy?</title><author><name sortKey="Hoffmann, Lars" sort="Hoffmann, Lars" uniqKey="Hoffmann L" first="Lars" last="Hoffmann">Lars Hoffmann</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Maastricht University</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Monaghan, Elizabeth" sort="Monaghan, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Monaghan E" first="Elizabeth" last="Monaghan">Elizabeth Monaghan</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Hull</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Politics</title><idno type="ISSN">0263-3957</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9256</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-10">2011-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="140">140</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="147">147</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0263-3957</idno></series><idno type="istex">B70AE74C669ED106CE4A750B450EE2255AA91778</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9256.2011.01413.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PONL1413</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0263-3957</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article we analyse the phenomenon of public debate on the future of Europe which has been become a preferred tool of EU policymakers over the last decade. We assess the potential legitimacy benefits of such a public debate process and examine in detail two case studies: the Convention on the Future of Europe and the Debate Europe website. We compare these two public debates with regard to their composition, objectives and working procedures. Our findings show that public debate is no panacea for the EU's ongoing legitimacy‐related problems and they also point to general challenges for citizens' involvement in the ongoing European integration process.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Hoffmann, Lars" sort="Hoffmann, Lars" uniqKey="Hoffmann L" first="Lars" last="Hoffmann">Lars Hoffmann</name><name sortKey="Monaghan, Elizabeth" sort="Monaghan, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Monaghan E" first="Elizabeth" last="Monaghan">Elizabeth Monaghan</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000699 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000699 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B70AE74C669ED106CE4A750B450EE2255AA91778
|texte= Public Debate on the Future of the European Union: A Viable Legitimising Strategy?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |