Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?
Identifieur interne : 000001 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000000; suivant : 000002Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?
Auteurs : Lotte Van Nevel ; Jan Mertens ; An De Schrijver ; Stefaan De Neve ; Kris VerheyenSource :
- Forest ecology and management [ 0378-1127 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
This study, aiming to unravel whether topsoil conditions under tree species with nutrient-poor leaf litter can be altered by admixing a shrub layer, was performed in 12 pine (mainly Pinus sylvestris) and 12 oak (Quercus robur) stands on sandy podzolic soils in north-east Belgium. We examined the effects of presence of a shrub layer on forest floor mass and topsoil chemical properties related to soil acidification. The shrub species included were European rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). For each tree species, 60-90 years old stands were selected containing shrubs present in varying cover classes: sparse (<20%), intermediate (20-70%) and dense (>70%). The oak stands were characterized by less but 'nutrient-richer' litterfall, compared to the pine stands. This was reflected in less humus build-up (FH-horizon) and higher pH, CEC, BS and lower C/N in the topsoil in the oak stands compared to the pine stands. However, despite the fact that the shrubs produced litter with significantly higher base cation and N concentrations than that of the studied tree species, we did not find any significant changes in topsoil conditions in the pine and oak stands under study, even under dense shrub layers (87-91% cover).
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 14-0241538 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils? |
AU : | VAN NEVEL (Lotte); MERTENS (Jan); DE SCHRIJVER (An); DE NEVE (Stefaan); VERHEYEN (Kris) |
AF : | Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267/9090 Melle/Belgique (1 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1/9000 Ghent/Belgique (2 aut.); Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653/9000 Ghent/Belgique (4 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Forest ecology and management; ISSN 0378-1127; Coden FECMDW; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 330; Pp. 38-45; Bibl. 1 p.1/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | This study, aiming to unravel whether topsoil conditions under tree species with nutrient-poor leaf litter can be altered by admixing a shrub layer, was performed in 12 pine (mainly Pinus sylvestris) and 12 oak (Quercus robur) stands on sandy podzolic soils in north-east Belgium. We examined the effects of presence of a shrub layer on forest floor mass and topsoil chemical properties related to soil acidification. The shrub species included were European rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). For each tree species, 60-90 years old stands were selected containing shrubs present in varying cover classes: sparse (<20%), intermediate (20-70%) and dense (>70%). The oak stands were characterized by less but 'nutrient-richer' litterfall, compared to the pine stands. This was reflected in less humus build-up (FH-horizon) and higher pH, CEC, BS and lower C/N in the topsoil in the oak stands compared to the pine stands. However, despite the fact that the shrubs produced litter with significantly higher base cation and N concentrations than that of the studied tree species, we did not find any significant changes in topsoil conditions in the pine and oak stands under study, even under dense shrub layers (87-91% cover). |
CC : | 002A33; 002A14B04B |
FD : | Espèce; Litière; Acidification; Forêt; Arbre forestier feuillu; Saturation; Fruticée; Foresterie; Texture; Arbrisseau; Quercus; Sol sableux; Sol forestier; Ecologie forestière |
FG : | Fagaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Plante ligneuse; Formation végétale; Végétation; Propriété physique; Type de sol textural; Type de sol écologique; Type de sol |
ED : | Species; Litter; Acidification; Forests; Hardwood forest tree; Saturation; Shrubbery; Forestry; Texture; Shrub; Quercus; Sandy soil; Forest soil; Forest ecology |
EG : | Fagaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Woody plant; Vegetation type; Vegetation; Physical properties |
SD : | Especie; Hojarasca; Acidificación; Bosque; Arbol forestal frondoso; Saturación; Arbustos; Ciencias forestales; Textura; Arbusto; Quercus; Suelo arenoso; Suelo forestal; Ecología forestal |
LO : | INIST-17223.354000504507340050 |
ID : | 14-0241538 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:14-0241538Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Nevel, Lotte" sort="Van Nevel, Lotte" uniqKey="Van Nevel L" first="Lotte" last="Van Nevel">Lotte Van Nevel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mertens, Jan" sort="Mertens, Jan" uniqKey="Mertens J" first="Jan" last="Mertens">Jan Mertens</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Schrijver, An" sort="De Schrijver, An" uniqKey="De Schrijver A" first="An" last="De Schrijver">An De Schrijver</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Neve, Stefaan" sort="De Neve, Stefaan" uniqKey="De Neve S" first="Stefaan" last="De Neve">Stefaan De Neve</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Verheyen, Kris" sort="Verheyen, Kris" uniqKey="Verheyen K" first="Kris" last="Verheyen">Kris Verheyen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0241538</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0241538 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0241538</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000001</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Nevel, Lotte" sort="Van Nevel, Lotte" uniqKey="Van Nevel L" first="Lotte" last="Van Nevel">Lotte Van Nevel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mertens, Jan" sort="Mertens, Jan" uniqKey="Mertens J" first="Jan" last="Mertens">Jan Mertens</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Schrijver, An" sort="De Schrijver, An" uniqKey="De Schrijver A" first="An" last="De Schrijver">An De Schrijver</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Neve, Stefaan" sort="De Neve, Stefaan" uniqKey="De Neve S" first="Stefaan" last="De Neve">Stefaan De Neve</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Verheyen, Kris" sort="Verheyen, Kris" uniqKey="Verheyen K" first="Kris" last="Verheyen">Kris Verheyen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Forest ecology and management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">For. ecol. manage.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Forest ecology and management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">For. ecol. manage.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acidification</term>
<term>Forest ecology</term>
<term>Forest soil</term>
<term>Forestry</term>
<term>Forests</term>
<term>Hardwood forest tree</term>
<term>Litter</term>
<term>Quercus</term>
<term>Sandy soil</term>
<term>Saturation</term>
<term>Shrub</term>
<term>Shrubbery</term>
<term>Species</term>
<term>Texture</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Espèce</term>
<term>Litière</term>
<term>Acidification</term>
<term>Forêt</term>
<term>Arbre forestier feuillu</term>
<term>Saturation</term>
<term>Fruticée</term>
<term>Foresterie</term>
<term>Texture</term>
<term>Arbrisseau</term>
<term>Quercus</term>
<term>Sol sableux</term>
<term>Sol forestier</term>
<term>Ecologie forestière</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study, aiming to unravel whether topsoil conditions under tree species with nutrient-poor leaf litter can be altered by admixing a shrub layer, was performed in 12 pine (mainly Pinus sylvestris) and 12 oak (Quercus robur) stands on sandy podzolic soils in north-east Belgium. We examined the effects of presence of a shrub layer on forest floor mass and topsoil chemical properties related to soil acidification. The shrub species included were European rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). For each tree species, 60-90 years old stands were selected containing shrubs present in varying cover classes: sparse (<20%), intermediate (20-70%) and dense (>70%). The oak stands were characterized by less but 'nutrient-richer' litterfall, compared to the pine stands. This was reflected in less humus build-up (FH-horizon) and higher pH, CEC, BS and lower C/N in the topsoil in the oak stands compared to the pine stands. However, despite the fact that the shrubs produced litter with significantly higher base cation and N concentrations than that of the studied tree species, we did not find any significant changes in topsoil conditions in the pine and oak stands under study, even under dense shrub layers (87-91% cover).</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0378-1127</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>FECMDW</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>For. ecol. manage.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>330</s2>
</fA05>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VAN NEVEL (Lotte)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MERTENS (Jan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>DE SCHRIJVER (An)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>DE NEVE (Stefaan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>VERHEYEN (Kris)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267</s1>
<s2>9090 Melle</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653</s1>
<s2>9000 Ghent</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>38-45</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17223</s2>
<s5>354000504507340050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0241538</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Forest ecology and management</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>This study, aiming to unravel whether topsoil conditions under tree species with nutrient-poor leaf litter can be altered by admixing a shrub layer, was performed in 12 pine (mainly Pinus sylvestris) and 12 oak (Quercus robur) stands on sandy podzolic soils in north-east Belgium. We examined the effects of presence of a shrub layer on forest floor mass and topsoil chemical properties related to soil acidification. The shrub species included were European rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). For each tree species, 60-90 years old stands were selected containing shrubs present in varying cover classes: sparse (<20%), intermediate (20-70%) and dense (>70%). The oak stands were characterized by less but 'nutrient-richer' litterfall, compared to the pine stands. This was reflected in less humus build-up (FH-horizon) and higher pH, CEC, BS and lower C/N in the topsoil in the oak stands compared to the pine stands. However, despite the fact that the shrubs produced litter with significantly higher base cation and N concentrations than that of the studied tree species, we did not find any significant changes in topsoil conditions in the pine and oak stands under study, even under dense shrub layers (87-91% cover).</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A33</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A14B04B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Espèce</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Species</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Especie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Litière</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Litter</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hojarasca</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acidification</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acidification</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acidificación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Forêt</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Forests</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bosque</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arbre forestier feuillu</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hardwood forest tree</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arbol forestal frondoso</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Saturation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Saturation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Saturación</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fruticée</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Shrubbery</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arbustos</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Foresterie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Forestry</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ciencias forestales</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Texture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Texture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Textura</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arbrisseau</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Shrub</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arbusto</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Quercus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Quercus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Quercus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sol sableux</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sandy soil</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Suelo arenoso</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sol forestier</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Forest soil</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Suelo forestal</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ecologie forestière</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Forest ecology</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ecología forestal</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fagaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fagaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fagaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plante ligneuse</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Woody plant</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Planta leñosa</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Formation végétale</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vegetation type</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Formación vegetal</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Végétation</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vegetation</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vegetación</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Propriété physique</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Physical properties</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Propiedad física</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Type de sol textural</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>68</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Type de sol écologique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Type de sol</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>293</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 14-0241538 INIST</NO>
<ET>Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?</ET>
<AU>VAN NEVEL (Lotte); MERTENS (Jan); DE SCHRIJVER (An); DE NEVE (Stefaan); VERHEYEN (Kris)</AU>
<AF>Forest Fr Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267/9090 Melle/Belgique (1 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1/9000 Ghent/Belgique (2 aut.); Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653/9000 Ghent/Belgique (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Forest ecology and management; ISSN 0378-1127; Coden FECMDW; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 330; Pp. 38-45; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This study, aiming to unravel whether topsoil conditions under tree species with nutrient-poor leaf litter can be altered by admixing a shrub layer, was performed in 12 pine (mainly Pinus sylvestris) and 12 oak (Quercus robur) stands on sandy podzolic soils in north-east Belgium. We examined the effects of presence of a shrub layer on forest floor mass and topsoil chemical properties related to soil acidification. The shrub species included were European rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). For each tree species, 60-90 years old stands were selected containing shrubs present in varying cover classes: sparse (<20%), intermediate (20-70%) and dense (>70%). The oak stands were characterized by less but 'nutrient-richer' litterfall, compared to the pine stands. This was reflected in less humus build-up (FH-horizon) and higher pH, CEC, BS and lower C/N in the topsoil in the oak stands compared to the pine stands. However, despite the fact that the shrubs produced litter with significantly higher base cation and N concentrations than that of the studied tree species, we did not find any significant changes in topsoil conditions in the pine and oak stands under study, even under dense shrub layers (87-91% cover).</EA>
<CC>002A33; 002A14B04B</CC>
<FD>Espèce; Litière; Acidification; Forêt; Arbre forestier feuillu; Saturation; Fruticée; Foresterie; Texture; Arbrisseau; Quercus; Sol sableux; Sol forestier; Ecologie forestière</FD>
<FG>Fagaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Plante ligneuse; Formation végétale; Végétation; Propriété physique; Type de sol textural; Type de sol écologique; Type de sol</FG>
<ED>Species; Litter; Acidification; Forests; Hardwood forest tree; Saturation; Shrubbery; Forestry; Texture; Shrub; Quercus; Sandy soil; Forest soil; Forest ecology</ED>
<EG>Fagaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Woody plant; Vegetation type; Vegetation; Physical properties</EG>
<SD>Especie; Hojarasca; Acidificación; Bosque; Arbol forestal frondoso; Saturación; Arbustos; Ciencias forestales; Textura; Arbusto; Quercus; Suelo arenoso; Suelo forestal; Ecología forestal</SD>
<LO>INIST-17223.354000504507340050</LO>
<ID>14-0241538</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000001 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000001 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Bois |area= CheneBelgiqueV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:14-0241538 |texte= Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils? }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |