Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.
Identifieur interne : 000025 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000024Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.
Auteurs : T. Pechmann ; G. MohrSource :
- Memory & cognition [ 0090-502X ] ; 1992.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
The degree of interference caused by different kinds of stimuli on memory for tonal pitch was studied. Musically trained and untrained subjects heard a sequence of two tones separated by an interval of 5 sec. The tones were either identical in pitch or differed by a semitone. Subjects had to decide whether the tones were identical or not. The interval was filled with tonal, verbal, or visual material under attended and unattended conditions. The results revealed clear group differences. Musically trained subjects' retention of the first test tone was only affected by the interposition of other tones. In contrast, the performance of musically untrained subjects was also affected by verbal and visual items. The findings are discussed in the framework of Baddeley's (1986) working-memory model.
PubMed: 1508056
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:1508056Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.</title><author><name sortKey="Pechmann, T" sort="Pechmann, T" uniqKey="Pechmann T" first="T" last="Pechmann">T. Pechmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mohr, G" sort="Mohr, G" uniqKey="Mohr G" first="G" last="Mohr">G. Mohr</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1992">1992</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:1508056</idno><idno type="pmid">1508056</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000025</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000025</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.</title><author><name sortKey="Pechmann, T" sort="Pechmann, T" uniqKey="Pechmann T" first="T" last="Pechmann">T. Pechmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mohr, G" sort="Mohr, G" uniqKey="Mohr G" first="G" last="Mohr">G. Mohr</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Memory & cognition</title><idno type="ISSN">0090-502X</idno><imprint><date when="1992" type="published">1992</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attention</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Music</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Pitch Discrimination</term><term>Retention (Psychology)</term><term>Speech Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attention</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Music</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Pitch Discrimination</term><term>Retention (Psychology)</term><term>Speech Perception</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The degree of interference caused by different kinds of stimuli on memory for tonal pitch was studied. Musically trained and untrained subjects heard a sequence of two tones separated by an interval of 5 sec. The tones were either identical in pitch or differed by a semitone. Subjects had to decide whether the tones were identical or not. The interval was filled with tonal, verbal, or visual material under attended and unattended conditions. The results revealed clear group differences. Musically trained subjects' retention of the first test tone was only affected by the interposition of other tones. In contrast, the performance of musically untrained subjects was also affected by verbal and visual items. The findings are discussed in the framework of Baddeley's (1986) working-memory model.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">1508056</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1992</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1992</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2004</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0090-502X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>20</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>1992</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Memory & cognition</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Mem Cognit</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>314-20</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The degree of interference caused by different kinds of stimuli on memory for tonal pitch was studied. Musically trained and untrained subjects heard a sequence of two tones separated by an interval of 5 sec. The tones were either identical in pitch or differed by a semitone. Subjects had to decide whether the tones were identical or not. The interval was filled with tonal, verbal, or visual material under attended and unattended conditions. The results revealed clear group differences. Musically trained subjects' retention of the first test tone was only affected by the interposition of other tones. In contrast, the performance of musically untrained subjects was also affected by verbal and visual items. The findings are discussed in the framework of Baddeley's (1986) working-memory model.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pechmann</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mohr</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Mem Cognit</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0357443</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0090-502X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>C</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011939" MajorTopicYN="Y">Mental Recall</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009146" MajorTopicYN="N">Music</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010364" MajorTopicYN="Y">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010897" MajorTopicYN="Y">Pitch Discrimination</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012153" MajorTopicYN="Y">Retention (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013067" MajorTopicYN="Y">Speech Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1992</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1992</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1992</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1508056</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000025 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000025 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:1508056
|texte= Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:1508056" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MusicSarreV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |