On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments
Identifieur interne : 000003 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000002; suivant : 000004On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments
Auteurs : C. Shawn Green ; Tilo Strobach ; Torsten SchubertSource :
- Psychological research : (Print) [ 0340-0727 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The past two decades have seen a tremendous surge in scientific interest in the extent to which certain types of training-be it aerobic, athletic, musical, video game, or brain trainer-can result in general enhancements in cognitive function. While there are certainly active debates regarding the results in these domains, what is perhaps more pressing is the fact that key aspects of methodology remain unsettled. Here we discuss a few of these areas including expectation effects, test-retest effects, the size of the cognitive test battery, the selection of control groups, group assignment methods, difficulties in comparing results across studies, and in interpreting null results. Specifically, our goal is to highlight points of contention as well as areas where the most commonly utilized methods could be improved upon. Furthermore, because each of the sub-areas above (aerobic training through brain training) share strong similarities in goal, theoretical framework, and experimental approach, we seek to discuss these issues from a general perspective that considers each as members of the same broad "training" domain.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 14-0277797 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments |
AU : | GREEN (C. Shawn); STROBACH (Tilo); SCHUBERT (Torsten); SCHUBERT (Torsten); STROBACH (Tilo); KARBACH (Julia) |
AF : | Department of Psychology, Games+Learning Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Madison, WI 53706/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18/12489 Berlin/Allemagne (2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18/12489 Berlin/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Psychology, FernUniversität Hagen/58084 Hagen/Allemagne (2 aut.); Department of Educational Science, Saarland University/66123 Saarbrücken/Allemagne (3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Psychological research : (Print); ISSN 0340-0727; Coden PSREDJ; Allemagne; Da. 2014; Vol. 78; No. 6; Pp. 756-772; Bibl. 2 p.3/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | The past two decades have seen a tremendous surge in scientific interest in the extent to which certain types of training-be it aerobic, athletic, musical, video game, or brain trainer-can result in general enhancements in cognitive function. While there are certainly active debates regarding the results in these domains, what is perhaps more pressing is the fact that key aspects of methodology remain unsettled. Here we discuss a few of these areas including expectation effects, test-retest effects, the size of the cognitive test battery, the selection of control groups, group assignment methods, difficulties in comparing results across studies, and in interpreting null results. Specifically, our goal is to highlight points of contention as well as areas where the most commonly utilized methods could be improved upon. Furthermore, because each of the sub-areas above (aerobic training through brain training) share strong similarities in goal, theoretical framework, and experimental approach, we seek to discuss these issues from a general perspective that considers each as members of the same broad "training" domain. |
CC : | 770B06D01 |
FD : | Méthodologie; Transfert; Entraînement psychologique; Apprentissage; Article synthèse; Homme |
FG : | Processus acquisition; Cognition |
ED : | Methodology; Transfer; Psychological training; Learning; Review; Human |
EG : | Acquisition process; Cognition |
SD : | Metodología; Transferencia; Entrenamiento psicológico; Aprendizaje; Artículo síntesis; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-7066.354000502684410010 |
ID : | 14-0277797 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:14-0277797Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments</title>
<author><name sortKey="Green, C Shawn" sort="Green, C Shawn" uniqKey="Green C" first="C. Shawn" last="Green">C. Shawn Green</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Games+Learning Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison</s1>
<s2>Madison, WI 53706</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Strobach, Tilo" sort="Strobach, Tilo" uniqKey="Strobach T" first="Tilo" last="Strobach">Tilo Strobach</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schubert, Torsten" sort="Schubert, Torsten" uniqKey="Schubert T" first="Torsten" last="Schubert">Torsten Schubert</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0277797</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0277797 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0277797</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000003</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments</title>
<author><name sortKey="Green, C Shawn" sort="Green, C Shawn" uniqKey="Green C" first="C. Shawn" last="Green">C. Shawn Green</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Games+Learning Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison</s1>
<s2>Madison, WI 53706</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Strobach, Tilo" sort="Strobach, Tilo" uniqKey="Strobach T" first="Tilo" last="Strobach">Tilo Strobach</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schubert, Torsten" sort="Schubert, Torsten" uniqKey="Schubert T" first="Torsten" last="Schubert">Torsten Schubert</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Psychological research : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychol. res. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0340-0727</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Psychological research : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychol. res. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0340-0727</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Human</term>
<term>Learning</term>
<term>Methodology</term>
<term>Psychological training</term>
<term>Review</term>
<term>Transfer</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Méthodologie</term>
<term>Transfert</term>
<term>Entraînement psychologique</term>
<term>Apprentissage</term>
<term>Article synthèse</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The past two decades have seen a tremendous surge in scientific interest in the extent to which certain types of training-be it aerobic, athletic, musical, video game, or brain trainer-can result in general enhancements in cognitive function. While there are certainly active debates regarding the results in these domains, what is perhaps more pressing is the fact that key aspects of methodology remain unsettled. Here we discuss a few of these areas including expectation effects, test-retest effects, the size of the cognitive test battery, the selection of control groups, group assignment methods, difficulties in comparing results across studies, and in interpreting null results. Specifically, our goal is to highlight points of contention as well as areas where the most commonly utilized methods could be improved upon. Furthermore, because each of the sub-areas above (aerobic training through brain training) share strong similarities in goal, theoretical framework, and experimental approach, we seek to discuss these issues from a general perspective that considers each as members of the same broad "training" domain.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0340-0727</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PSREDJ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Psychol. res. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>78</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>New directions in cognitive training</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GREEN (C. Shawn)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>STROBACH (Tilo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SCHUBERT (Torsten)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SCHUBERT (Torsten)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>STROBACH (Tilo)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KARBACH (Julia)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Games+Learning Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison</s1>
<s2>Madison, WI 53706</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18</s1>
<s2>12489 Berlin</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, FernUniversität Hagen</s1>
<s2>58084 Hagen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="03"><s1>Department of Educational Science, Saarland University</s1>
<s2>66123 Saarbrücken</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>756-772</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>7066</s2>
<s5>354000502684410010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0277797</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Psychological research : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The past two decades have seen a tremendous surge in scientific interest in the extent to which certain types of training-be it aerobic, athletic, musical, video game, or brain trainer-can result in general enhancements in cognitive function. While there are certainly active debates regarding the results in these domains, what is perhaps more pressing is the fact that key aspects of methodology remain unsettled. Here we discuss a few of these areas including expectation effects, test-retest effects, the size of the cognitive test battery, the selection of control groups, group assignment methods, difficulties in comparing results across studies, and in interpreting null results. Specifically, our goal is to highlight points of contention as well as areas where the most commonly utilized methods could be improved upon. Furthermore, because each of the sub-areas above (aerobic training through brain training) share strong similarities in goal, theoretical framework, and experimental approach, we seek to discuss these issues from a general perspective that considers each as members of the same broad "training" domain.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B06D01</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Méthodologie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Methodology</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Metodología</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Transfert</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Transfer</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Transferencia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Entraînement psychologique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Psychological training</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Entrenamiento psicológico</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Apprentissage</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Learning</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aprendizaje</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Article synthèse</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Review</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Artículo síntesis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Processus acquisition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acquisition process</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Proceso adquisición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>349</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0277797 INIST</NO>
<ET>On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments</ET>
<AU>GREEN (C. Shawn); STROBACH (Tilo); SCHUBERT (Torsten); SCHUBERT (Torsten); STROBACH (Tilo); KARBACH (Julia)</AU>
<AF>Department of Psychology, Games+Learning Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Madison, WI 53706/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Department of Psychology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18/12489 Berlin/Allemagne (2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18/12489 Berlin/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Psychology, FernUniversität Hagen/58084 Hagen/Allemagne (2 aut.); Department of Educational Science, Saarland University/66123 Saarbrücken/Allemagne (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Psychological research : (Print); ISSN 0340-0727; Coden PSREDJ; Allemagne; Da. 2014; Vol. 78; No. 6; Pp. 756-772; Bibl. 2 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The past two decades have seen a tremendous surge in scientific interest in the extent to which certain types of training-be it aerobic, athletic, musical, video game, or brain trainer-can result in general enhancements in cognitive function. While there are certainly active debates regarding the results in these domains, what is perhaps more pressing is the fact that key aspects of methodology remain unsettled. Here we discuss a few of these areas including expectation effects, test-retest effects, the size of the cognitive test battery, the selection of control groups, group assignment methods, difficulties in comparing results across studies, and in interpreting null results. Specifically, our goal is to highlight points of contention as well as areas where the most commonly utilized methods could be improved upon. Furthermore, because each of the sub-areas above (aerobic training through brain training) share strong similarities in goal, theoretical framework, and experimental approach, we seek to discuss these issues from a general perspective that considers each as members of the same broad "training" domain.</EA>
<CC>770B06D01</CC>
<FD>Méthodologie; Transfert; Entraînement psychologique; Apprentissage; Article synthèse; Homme</FD>
<FG>Processus acquisition; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Methodology; Transfer; Psychological training; Learning; Review; Human</ED>
<EG>Acquisition process; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Metodología; Transferencia; Entrenamiento psicológico; Aprendizaje; Artículo síntesis; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-7066.354000502684410010</LO>
<ID>14-0277797</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000003 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000003 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Sarre |area= MusicSarreV3 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:14-0277797 |texte= On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |