The double negative effect: The (almost) paradoxical role of the individual self in minority and majority members' information processing
Identifieur interne : 000D79 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D78; suivant : 000D80The double negative effect: The (almost) paradoxical role of the individual self in minority and majority members' information processing
Auteurs : Rainer Simon [Allemagne] ; Birgit Aufderheide [Allemagne] ; Claudia Hastedt [Allemagne]Source :
- British Journal of Social Psychology [ 0144-6665 ] ; 2000-03.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Abstract information, Accessibility, Accessibility conditions, Accessibility interaction, Additional data, Anova, Bernd, Bernd simon, Brewer, British journal, Categorization, Chichester wiley, Collective self, Computer screen, Critical categorization dimension, Critical interaction, Dependent measure, Dependent measures, Ecological psychology, European review, Experimental conditions, Expt, Group cohesiveness, Group level, Group members, Group membership, Hastedt, High accessibility, Higher scores, Independent variables, Individual self, Individual self figure, Individual task, Information processing, Ingroup, Interchangeable group member, Intergroup, Intergroup errors, Intragroup, Intragroup errors, Ller, Ller statements, Majority members, Majority membership, Median split, Memory task, Minimal group paradigm, Minority ingroup majority ingroup, Minority members, Minority position, Modern society, Nding, Numerical distribution, Numerical information, Other words, Overall measure, Participant, Preference, Present experiment, Range scores, Relative size, Research participants, Rural life, Same preference, Simon, Simon hastedt, Social categorization, Social cognition, Social psychology, Target group, Typical group member, Typical group members, Unique individuals, Urban life.
Abstract
The authors examined the interactive influence of accessibility of the individual self and relative in‐group size on group‐level as opposed to individual‐level information processing. In Expt 1, the authors predicted and found that, when accessibility of the individual self was low, minority members tended more towards group‐level information processing than did majority members. This was not true when accessibility of the individual self was high. Contrary to the authors hypothesis, however, the disappearance of the minority‐majority effect in the high‐accessibility condition did not result from a decrease in group‐level information processing among minority members, but from an increase among majority members. Experiment 2 replicated this unexpected effect using two different measures of group‐level information processing. It also provided additional data on the dynamic interplay of the individual self and the collective self which seems to be responsible for the observed effects.
Url:
DOI: 10.1348/014466600164345
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000029
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000028
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000B69
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000D80
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000D79
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The double negative effect: The (almost) paradoxical role of the individual self in minority and majority members' information processing</title><author><name sortKey="Simon, Rainer" sort="Simon, Rainer" uniqKey="Simon R" first="Rainer" last="Simon">Rainer Simon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aufderheide, Birgit" sort="Aufderheide, Birgit" uniqKey="Aufderheide B" first="Birgit" last="Aufderheide">Birgit Aufderheide</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hastedt, Claudia" sort="Hastedt, Claudia" uniqKey="Hastedt C" first="Claudia" last="Hastedt">Claudia Hastedt</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:02BE6EB8F208341A620B79CF47019175BA05E82A</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1348/014466600164345</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/02BE6EB8F208341A620B79CF47019175BA05E82A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000029</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000029</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000028</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B69</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B69</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0144-6665:2000:Simon R:the:double:negative</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000D80</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000D79</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000D79</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The double negative effect: The (almost) paradoxical role of the individual self in minority and majority members' information processing</title><author><name sortKey="Simon, Rainer" sort="Simon, Rainer" uniqKey="Simon R" first="Rainer" last="Simon">Rainer Simon</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Kiel</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aufderheide, Birgit" sort="Aufderheide, Birgit" uniqKey="Aufderheide B" first="Birgit" last="Aufderheide">Birgit Aufderheide</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Kiel</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hastedt, Claudia" sort="Hastedt, Claudia" uniqKey="Hastedt C" first="Claudia" last="Hastedt">Claudia Hastedt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Kiel</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">British Journal of Social Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0144-6665</idno><idno type="eISSN">2044-8309</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-03">2000-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="73">73</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="93">93</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0144-6665</idno></series><idno type="istex">02BE6EB8F208341A620B79CF47019175BA05E82A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1348/014466600164345</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BJSO34</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0144-6665</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abstract information</term><term>Accessibility</term><term>Accessibility conditions</term><term>Accessibility interaction</term><term>Additional data</term><term>Anova</term><term>Bernd</term><term>Bernd simon</term><term>Brewer</term><term>British journal</term><term>Categorization</term><term>Chichester wiley</term><term>Collective self</term><term>Computer screen</term><term>Critical categorization dimension</term><term>Critical interaction</term><term>Dependent measure</term><term>Dependent measures</term><term>Ecological psychology</term><term>European review</term><term>Experimental conditions</term><term>Expt</term><term>Group cohesiveness</term><term>Group level</term><term>Group members</term><term>Group membership</term><term>Hastedt</term><term>High accessibility</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Individual self</term><term>Individual self figure</term><term>Individual task</term><term>Information processing</term><term>Ingroup</term><term>Interchangeable group member</term><term>Intergroup</term><term>Intergroup errors</term><term>Intragroup</term><term>Intragroup errors</term><term>Ller</term><term>Ller statements</term><term>Majority members</term><term>Majority membership</term><term>Median split</term><term>Memory task</term><term>Minimal group paradigm</term><term>Minority ingroup majority ingroup</term><term>Minority members</term><term>Minority position</term><term>Modern society</term><term>Nding</term><term>Numerical distribution</term><term>Numerical information</term><term>Other words</term><term>Overall measure</term><term>Participant</term><term>Preference</term><term>Present experiment</term><term>Range scores</term><term>Relative size</term><term>Research participants</term><term>Rural life</term><term>Same preference</term><term>Simon</term><term>Simon hastedt</term><term>Social categorization</term><term>Social cognition</term><term>Social psychology</term><term>Target group</term><term>Typical group member</term><term>Typical group members</term><term>Unique individuals</term><term>Urban life</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The authors examined the interactive influence of accessibility of the individual self and relative in‐group size on group‐level as opposed to individual‐level information processing. In Expt 1, the authors predicted and found that, when accessibility of the individual self was low, minority members tended more towards group‐level information processing than did majority members. This was not true when accessibility of the individual self was high. Contrary to the authors hypothesis, however, the disappearance of the minority‐majority effect in the high‐accessibility condition did not result from a decrease in group‐level information processing among minority members, but from an increase among majority members. Experiment 2 replicated this unexpected effect using two different measures of group‐level information processing. It also provided additional data on the dynamic interplay of the individual self and the collective self which seems to be responsible for the observed effects.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Simon, Rainer" sort="Simon, Rainer" uniqKey="Simon R" first="Rainer" last="Simon">Rainer Simon</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Aufderheide, Birgit" sort="Aufderheide, Birgit" uniqKey="Aufderheide B" first="Birgit" last="Aufderheide">Birgit Aufderheide</name><name sortKey="Hastedt, Claudia" sort="Hastedt, Claudia" uniqKey="Hastedt C" first="Claudia" last="Hastedt">Claudia Hastedt</name><name sortKey="Simon, Rainer" sort="Simon, Rainer" uniqKey="Simon R" first="Rainer" last="Simon">Rainer Simon</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D79 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D79 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:02BE6EB8F208341A620B79CF47019175BA05E82A
|texte= The double negative effect: The (almost) paradoxical role of the individual self in minority and majority members' information processing
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |