Serveur d'exploration sur la musique en Sarre

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique

Identifieur interne : 000C22 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000C21; suivant : 000C23

What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique

Auteurs : David Demeritt [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:1F7B9E624CA994BF43FE65E897373F2246BCCFA9

English descriptors

Abstract

This paper seeks to clarify what is meant by the ‘social construction of nature’, which has become a crude but common term used to describe very different understandings of nature, knowledge and the world. I distinguish two broad varieties of construction talk in the social sciences: construction-as-refutation and construction-as-philosophical-critique. The first uses the construction metaphor to refute false beliefs about the world and is consistent with orthodox philosophical stances, such as positivism and realism. By contrast, I identify four other, more radical sorts of construction-as-philosophical-critique that use the construction metaphor to question the culture/nature, subject/object and representation/reality dualisms that provide the conventional philosophical foundation for distinguishing true conceptions of nature from false ones. Another source of confusion has been the question of precisely what is meant by the term ‘nature’. Making distinctions among different senses of that term can provide some badly needed clarity in debates about the social construction of nature. It also highlights a broad difference between those for whom the social construction of nature refers to the construction of our concepts of nature and those for whom the construction of nature refers to the process of constructing nature in the physical and material sense. That distinction, in turn, suggests two major, if also somewhat related, points of theoretical contention: first, the epistemological significance of understanding concepts of nature as constructed; second, the philosophical and political implications of arguing that nature is a socially constructed and contingent phenomenon. These are difficult philosophical and political questions, and the variety of constructionisms suggests that it is possible to answer them in a number of different ways.

Url:
DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph402oa


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Demeritt, David" sort="Demeritt, David" uniqKey="Demeritt D" first="David" last="Demeritt">David Demeritt</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1F7B9E624CA994BF43FE65E897373F2246BCCFA9</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1191/0309132502ph402oa</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1F7B9E624CA994BF43FE65E897373F2246BCCFA9/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000330</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000330</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000310</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0309-1325:2002:Demeritt D:what:is:the</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000C23</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000C22</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Demeritt, David" sort="Demeritt, David" uniqKey="Demeritt D" first="David" last="Demeritt">David Demeritt</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Geography, King's College London, The Strand, London WC2R 2LS</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>London WC2R 2LS</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Progress in Human Geography</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0309-1325</idno>
<idno type="eISSN"></idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-12">2002-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="767">767</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="790">790</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0309-1325</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">1F7B9E624CA994BF43FE65E897373F2246BCCFA9</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1191/0309132502ph402oa</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">10.1191_0309132502ph402oa</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0309-1325</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>American geographers</term>
<term>Braun</term>
<term>British columbia</term>
<term>British geographers</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Castree</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Collegiate dictionary</term>
<term>Conceptual</term>
<term>Conceptual construction</term>
<term>Conceptual constructions</term>
<term>Construction metaphor</term>
<term>Constructionism</term>
<term>Constructionist</term>
<term>Constructionist arguments</term>
<term>Constructionists</term>
<term>Contention concerns</term>
<term>Contingent</term>
<term>Contingent concepts</term>
<term>Contingent phenomenon</term>
<term>Critical geographers</term>
<term>Critical realism</term>
<term>Critical realists</term>
<term>Critique</term>
<term>Cultural geography</term>
<term>Current anthropology</term>
<term>Deconstruction</term>
<term>Demeritt</term>
<term>Descriptive phenomenology</term>
<term>Different senses</term>
<term>Different understandings</term>
<term>Different varieties</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Discursive</term>
<term>Discursive construction</term>
<term>Discursive constructionism</term>
<term>Discursive constructionists</term>
<term>Discursive practices</term>
<term>Dualism</term>
<term>Environmental</term>
<term>Environmental discourse</term>
<term>Environmental history</term>
<term>Environmental politics</term>
<term>Environmental problems</term>
<term>Environmental sociology</term>
<term>Epistemological</term>
<term>Epistemological criterion</term>
<term>Epistemological implications</term>
<term>Epistemological significance</term>
<term>Essential nature</term>
<term>Essential quality</term>
<term>Faithful accounts</term>
<term>False belief</term>
<term>False ones</term>
<term>First kind</term>
<term>First nature</term>
<term>First step</term>
<term>Genetic engineering</term>
<term>Geographer</term>
<term>Geography</term>
<term>Global warming</term>
<term>Greater terminological precision</term>
<term>Hacking</term>
<term>Haraway</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Hierarchical oppositions</term>
<term>Human geography</term>
<term>Human values</term>
<term>Intersubjective claimsmaking</term>
<term>Knowledge claims</term>
<term>Logical positivists</term>
<term>Many critics</term>
<term>Many forms</term>
<term>Many proponents</term>
<term>Many senses</term>
<term>Material construction</term>
<term>Material phenomenon</term>
<term>Metaphor</term>
<term>Metaphysical commitments</term>
<term>Moral detachment</term>
<term>More epistemologically</term>
<term>Native peoples</term>
<term>Natural disaster</term>
<term>Natural disasters</term>
<term>Natural environments</term>
<term>Natural products</term>
<term>Nominalism</term>
<term>Ontological claims</term>
<term>Ontological idealism</term>
<term>Ontological status</term>
<term>Other things</term>
<term>Other varieties</term>
<term>Other versions</term>
<term>Particular claims</term>
<term>Particular concepts</term>
<term>Pergamon press</term>
<term>Phenomenological</term>
<term>Phenomenological approaches</term>
<term>Phenomenological construction</term>
<term>Phenomenological constructionism</term>
<term>Phenomenological constructionists</term>
<term>Phenomenology</term>
<term>Philosophical implications</term>
<term>Philosophical stance</term>
<term>Physical environment</term>
<term>Physical geographers</term>
<term>Political critique</term>
<term>Political ecology</term>
<term>Political implications</term>
<term>Polity press</term>
<term>Postmodernism</term>
<term>Practical engagements</term>
<term>Preliminary distinction</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Proponent</term>
<term>Rain forests</term>
<term>Real world</term>
<term>Realist</term>
<term>Realist sense</term>
<term>Reflexive programme</term>
<term>Refutationist claims</term>
<term>Research subjects</term>
<term>Routledge</term>
<term>Science studies</term>
<term>Scientific knowledge</term>
<term>Scientific phenomena</term>
<term>Sens</term>
<term>Sharp distinction</term>
<term>Social construction</term>
<term>Social constructionism</term>
<term>Social constructions</term>
<term>Social contingency</term>
<term>Social facts</term>
<term>Social nature</term>
<term>Social problems</term>
<term>Social processes</term>
<term>Social reality</term>
<term>Social sciences</term>
<term>Social scientists</term>
<term>Social studies</term>
<term>Social theory</term>
<term>Spatial science</term>
<term>Strong programme</term>
<term>Such debates</term>
<term>Symmetry principle</term>
<term>Theoretical contention</term>
<term>Transcendental phenomenology</term>
<term>True conceptions</term>
<term>Truth claims</term>
<term>Understanding concepts</term>
<term>Various meanings</term>
<term>Ways people</term>
<term>Wilderness nature</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper seeks to clarify what is meant by the ‘social construction of nature’, which has become a crude but common term used to describe very different understandings of nature, knowledge and the world. I distinguish two broad varieties of construction talk in the social sciences: construction-as-refutation and construction-as-philosophical-critique. The first uses the construction metaphor to refute false beliefs about the world and is consistent with orthodox philosophical stances, such as positivism and realism. By contrast, I identify four other, more radical sorts of construction-as-philosophical-critique that use the construction metaphor to question the culture/nature, subject/object and representation/reality dualisms that provide the conventional philosophical foundation for distinguishing true conceptions of nature from false ones. Another source of confusion has been the question of precisely what is meant by the term ‘nature’. Making distinctions among different senses of that term can provide some badly needed clarity in debates about the social construction of nature. It also highlights a broad difference between those for whom the social construction of nature refers to the construction of our concepts of nature and those for whom the construction of nature refers to the process of constructing nature in the physical and material sense. That distinction, in turn, suggests two major, if also somewhat related, points of theoretical contention: first, the epistemological significance of understanding concepts of nature as constructed; second, the philosophical and political implications of arguing that nature is a socially constructed and contingent phenomenon. These are difficult philosophical and political questions, and the variety of constructionisms suggests that it is possible to answer them in a number of different ways.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Demeritt, David" sort="Demeritt, David" uniqKey="Demeritt D" first="David" last="Demeritt">David Demeritt</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C22 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000C22 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sarre
   |area=    MusicSarreV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:1F7B9E624CA994BF43FE65E897373F2246BCCFA9
   |texte=   What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Sun Jul 15 18:16:09 2018. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 19:21:25 2024