Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations
Identifieur interne : 001810 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001809; suivant : 001811Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations
Auteurs : Hannah MacphersonSource :
- Geography Compass [ 1749-8198 ] ; 2010-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Animating landscape, Author journal compilation, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Bodylandscape relations, British countryside, British geographers, Complementary terms, Comprehensive review, Countryside agency, Critical summary, Cultural geographers, Cultural geographies, Cultural geography, Dewsbury, Disability, Disabled body, Disabled people, Dordrecht press, English countryside, Fragments landscapes fragments, Geographer, Geographical essays, Geography, Geography compass, Harrison, Human experience, Human geographies, Human geography, Impairment, Landscape, Landscape concept, Lorimer, Macpherson, Material culture, Material landscape, Mccormack, Methodological approaches, Methodological challenges, Minnesota press, More describable, Noble books, Object world, Ordinary landscapes, Orkney hill land, Oxford university press, Particular landscapes, Phenomenology, Photo essay, Potential place, Recent approaches, Recent work, Researcher, Routledge, Social life, Such approaches, Thrift, User illusion, Visual impairment, Visual impairments, White cane, Wylie.
Abstract
This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (Rose 2002) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (Rose and Wylie 2006). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title><author><name sortKey="Macpherson, Hannah" sort="Macpherson, Hannah" uniqKey="Macpherson H" first="Hannah" last="Macpherson">Hannah Macpherson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of London</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001810</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001810</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title><author><name sortKey="Macpherson, Hannah" sort="Macpherson, Hannah" uniqKey="Macpherson H" first="Hannah" last="Macpherson">Hannah Macpherson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of London</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Geography Compass</title><idno type="ISSN">1749-8198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1749-8198</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01">2010-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="13">13</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1749-8198</idno></series><idno type="istex">E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GEC3276</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1749-8198</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Animating landscape</term><term>Author journal compilation</term><term>Blackwell</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bodylandscape relations</term><term>British countryside</term><term>British geographers</term><term>Complementary terms</term><term>Comprehensive review</term><term>Countryside agency</term><term>Critical summary</term><term>Cultural geographers</term><term>Cultural geographies</term><term>Cultural geography</term><term>Dewsbury</term><term>Disability</term><term>Disabled body</term><term>Disabled people</term><term>Dordrecht press</term><term>English countryside</term><term>Fragments landscapes fragments</term><term>Geographer</term><term>Geographical essays</term><term>Geography</term><term>Geography compass</term><term>Harrison</term><term>Human experience</term><term>Human geographies</term><term>Human geography</term><term>Impairment</term><term>Landscape</term><term>Landscape concept</term><term>Lorimer</term><term>Macpherson</term><term>Material culture</term><term>Material landscape</term><term>Mccormack</term><term>Methodological approaches</term><term>Methodological challenges</term><term>Minnesota press</term><term>More describable</term><term>Noble books</term><term>Object world</term><term>Ordinary landscapes</term><term>Orkney hill land</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Particular landscapes</term><term>Phenomenology</term><term>Photo essay</term><term>Potential place</term><term>Recent approaches</term><term>Recent work</term><term>Researcher</term><term>Routledge</term><term>Social life</term><term>Such approaches</term><term>Thrift</term><term>User illusion</term><term>Visual impairment</term><term>Visual impairments</term><term>White cane</term><term>Wylie</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (Rose 2002) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (Rose and Wylie 2006). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>author journal compilation</json:string><json:string>geography compass</json:string><json:string>lorimer</json:string><json:string>dewsbury</json:string><json:string>routledge</json:string><json:string>geographer</json:string><json:string>cultural geography</json:string><json:string>human geography</json:string><json:string>phenomenology</json:string><json:string>visual impairment</json:string><json:string>geography</json:string><json:string>wylie</json:string><json:string>mccormack</json:string><json:string>impairment</json:string><json:string>disabled body</json:string><json:string>landscape</json:string><json:string>particular landscapes</json:string><json:string>cultural geographies</json:string><json:string>recent work</json:string><json:string>user illusion</json:string><json:string>landscape concept</json:string><json:string>minnesota press</json:string><json:string>british geographers</json:string><json:string>macpherson</json:string><json:string>researcher</json:string><json:string>methodological approaches</json:string><json:string>orkney hill land</json:string><json:string>visual impairments</json:string><json:string>british countryside</json:string><json:string>countryside agency</json:string><json:string>methodological challenges</json:string><json:string>complementary terms</json:string><json:string>potential place</json:string><json:string>more describable</json:string><json:string>geographical essays</json:string><json:string>object world</json:string><json:string>social life</json:string><json:string>oxford university press</json:string><json:string>cultural geographers</json:string><json:string>white cane</json:string><json:string>bodylandscape relations</json:string><json:string>critical summary</json:string><json:string>material culture</json:string><json:string>animating landscape</json:string><json:string>material landscape</json:string><json:string>photo essay</json:string><json:string>fragments landscapes fragments</json:string><json:string>human experience</json:string><json:string>english countryside</json:string><json:string>recent approaches</json:string><json:string>human geographies</json:string><json:string>comprehensive review</json:string><json:string>noble books</json:string><json:string>ordinary landscapes</json:string><json:string>disabled people</json:string><json:string>dordrecht press</json:string><json:string>such approaches</json:string><json:string>blackwell</json:string><json:string>harrison</json:string><json:string>thrift</json:string><json:string>disability</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Hannah Macpherson</name><affiliations><json:string>University of London</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>GEC3276</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (Rose 2002) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (Rose and Wylie 2006). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.824</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>484.724 x 697.323 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1035</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6946</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43159</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>152</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Geography Compass</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1749-8198</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1749-8198</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1749-8198</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>GEC3</json:string></publisherId><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>1</first><last>13</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><categories><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</json:string></doi><id>E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2009 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</p></availability><date>2010</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Hannah</forename><surname>Macpherson</surname></persName><affiliation>University of London</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Geography Compass</title><idno type="pISSN">1749-8198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1749-8198</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1749-8198</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="13">13</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GEC3276</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2010</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (Rose 2002) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (Rose and Wylie 2006). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1749-8198</doi><issn type="print">1749-8198</issn><issn type="electronic">1749-8198</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GEC3"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GEOGRAPHY COMPASS">Geography Compass</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/geco.2009.4.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-01">January 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GEC3276"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Cultural</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-01-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-01-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.15 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-07-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="13">13</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GEC3.GEC3276.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title><title type="short">Body‐landscape relations</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>Hannah</givenNames><familyName>Macpherson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of London</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (<link href="#b82">Rose 2002</link>) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (<link href="#b85">Rose and Wylie 2006</link>). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Body‐landscape relations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hannah</namePart><namePart type="family">Macpherson</namePart><affiliation>University of London</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This short paper offers a critical summary of some of the key themes of non‐representational theory (NRT), with a particular focus on recent approaches to body‐landscape relations and the potential place of disability in these accounts. NRT in British human geography has encouraged an emphasis on the embodied, practiced and habitual qualities of embodied experience. Recent non‐representational work on landscape has developed these agendas to show how landscape may be thought of as a ‘process’ (Rose 2002) or ‘tension’ which potentially ‘animates’ the embodied subject (Rose and Wylie 2006). Here the body and the landscape are understood to be complimentary concepts that are useful to think through together – each in a constant process of ‘becoming’ through the other. This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of researching such non‐representational body‐landscape relations, showing how researchers have drawn on insights of disciplines as diverse as neuroscience and performance studies to address this challenge.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Geography Compass</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1749-8198</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1749-8198</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1749-8198</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GEC3</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>4</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>13</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GEC3276</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001810 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001810 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E7D2CCA6A988495AB4A35D69A547F5823CFB22BE
|texte= Non‐Representational Approaches to Body–Landscape Relations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |