Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience
Identifieur interne : 001137 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001136; suivant : 001138Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience
Auteurs : Elizabeth K. Johnson ; Ellen Westrek ; Thierry Nazzi ; Anne CutlerSource :
- Developmental Science [ 1363-755X ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Acoustic, Acoustic distinctiveness, Acoustic measurements, Acoustic measures, Acoustic properties, Acoustical society, Adult listeners, Auditory, Auditory stimuli, Average habituation trials, Bertoncini, Blackwell publishing, Change trials, Chinese speakers, Cognitive psychology, Developmental science, Different sentences, Dutch, Dutch infants, Dutch speaker, Dutch speakers, Dutch stimuli, Dutch voice recordings, Dutch voices, Early infancy, Early word representations, English listeners, English stimuli, English voices, Experimental psychology, Face recognition, Familiar language, Familiar names, First year, Foreign language, Forensic linguistics, Fundamental frequency, Further support, Habituation, Habituation phase, Habituation trials, Heugten johnson, Houston jusczyk, Human perception, Indexical, Indexical information, Infant, Infant recognition, Infant voice discernment, Italian speakers, Japanese speakers, Japanese voices, Jusczyk, Language acquisition research, Language comprehension, Language discrimination, Language discrimination studies, Language experience, Language experience hypothesis, Language familiarity, Language familiarity effects, Language pair, Language sets, Linguistic experience, Linguistic information, Linguistic message, Little work, Mcqueen cutler, Mehler, Mother tongue, Native language, Native language voice, Native language voices, Native phonology, Native tongue, Nazzi, Other languages, Participant, Phonetic information, Pisoni, Present study, Previous studies, Psychological science, Rhythmic structure, Same language, Same recordings, Same time, Schiller, Second language, Similar voices, Sound patterns, Sound structure, Speech conditions, Speech perception, Speech signal, Stimulus presentation, Stimulus variability, Successful voice discrimination, Support voice discrimination, Talker, Talker identification, Test phase, Test trials, Unfamiliar language, Unfamiliar languages, Unmodified stimuli, Visual stimulus, Voice change, Voice change trials, Voice changes, Voice discrimination, Voice identification, Voice recognition, Voice recognition capabilities, Wider range, Word prosody, Word recognition.
Abstract
A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Elizabeth K" sort="Johnson, Elizabeth K" uniqKey="Johnson E" first="Elizabeth K." last="Johnson">Elizabeth K. Johnson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Westrek, Ellen" sort="Westrek, Ellen" uniqKey="Westrek E" first="Ellen" last="Westrek">Ellen Westrek</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nazzi, Thierry" sort="Nazzi, Thierry" uniqKey="Nazzi T" first="Thierry" last="Nazzi">Thierry Nazzi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cutler, Anne" sort="Cutler, Anne" uniqKey="Cutler A" first="Anne" last="Cutler">Anne Cutler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation> MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001137</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001137</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Elizabeth K" sort="Johnson, Elizabeth K" uniqKey="Johnson E" first="Elizabeth K." last="Johnson">Elizabeth K. Johnson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Westrek, Ellen" sort="Westrek, Ellen" uniqKey="Westrek E" first="Ellen" last="Westrek">Ellen Westrek</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nazzi, Thierry" sort="Nazzi, Thierry" uniqKey="Nazzi T" first="Thierry" last="Nazzi">Thierry Nazzi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cutler, Anne" sort="Cutler, Anne" uniqKey="Cutler A" first="Anne" last="Cutler">Anne Cutler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation> MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Developmental Science</title><idno type="ISSN">1363-755X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-7687</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1002">1002</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1011">1011</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1363-755X</idno></series><idno type="istex">A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">DESC1052</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1363-755X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic</term><term>Acoustic distinctiveness</term><term>Acoustic measurements</term><term>Acoustic measures</term><term>Acoustic properties</term><term>Acoustical society</term><term>Adult listeners</term><term>Auditory</term><term>Auditory stimuli</term><term>Average habituation trials</term><term>Bertoncini</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Change trials</term><term>Chinese speakers</term><term>Cognitive psychology</term><term>Developmental science</term><term>Different sentences</term><term>Dutch</term><term>Dutch infants</term><term>Dutch speaker</term><term>Dutch speakers</term><term>Dutch stimuli</term><term>Dutch voice recordings</term><term>Dutch voices</term><term>Early infancy</term><term>Early word representations</term><term>English listeners</term><term>English stimuli</term><term>English voices</term><term>Experimental psychology</term><term>Face recognition</term><term>Familiar language</term><term>Familiar names</term><term>First year</term><term>Foreign language</term><term>Forensic linguistics</term><term>Fundamental frequency</term><term>Further support</term><term>Habituation</term><term>Habituation phase</term><term>Habituation trials</term><term>Heugten johnson</term><term>Houston jusczyk</term><term>Human perception</term><term>Indexical</term><term>Indexical information</term><term>Infant</term><term>Infant recognition</term><term>Infant voice discernment</term><term>Italian speakers</term><term>Japanese speakers</term><term>Japanese voices</term><term>Jusczyk</term><term>Language acquisition research</term><term>Language comprehension</term><term>Language discrimination</term><term>Language discrimination studies</term><term>Language experience</term><term>Language experience hypothesis</term><term>Language familiarity</term><term>Language familiarity effects</term><term>Language pair</term><term>Language sets</term><term>Linguistic experience</term><term>Linguistic information</term><term>Linguistic message</term><term>Little work</term><term>Mcqueen cutler</term><term>Mehler</term><term>Mother tongue</term><term>Native language</term><term>Native language voice</term><term>Native language voices</term><term>Native phonology</term><term>Native tongue</term><term>Nazzi</term><term>Other languages</term><term>Participant</term><term>Phonetic information</term><term>Pisoni</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Psychological science</term><term>Rhythmic structure</term><term>Same language</term><term>Same recordings</term><term>Same time</term><term>Schiller</term><term>Second language</term><term>Similar voices</term><term>Sound patterns</term><term>Sound structure</term><term>Speech conditions</term><term>Speech perception</term><term>Speech signal</term><term>Stimulus presentation</term><term>Stimulus variability</term><term>Successful voice discrimination</term><term>Support voice discrimination</term><term>Talker</term><term>Talker identification</term><term>Test phase</term><term>Test trials</term><term>Unfamiliar language</term><term>Unfamiliar languages</term><term>Unmodified stimuli</term><term>Visual stimulus</term><term>Voice change</term><term>Voice change trials</term><term>Voice changes</term><term>Voice discrimination</term><term>Voice identification</term><term>Voice recognition</term><term>Voice recognition capabilities</term><term>Wider range</term><term>Word prosody</term><term>Word recognition</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>habituation</json:string><json:string>native language</json:string><json:string>foreign language</json:string><json:string>jusczyk</json:string><json:string>talker</json:string><json:string>nazzi</json:string><json:string>auditory</json:string><json:string>indexical</json:string><json:string>habituation trials</json:string><json:string>pisoni</json:string><json:string>voice recognition</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>schiller</json:string><json:string>mehler</json:string><json:string>psychological science</json:string><json:string>bertoncini</json:string><json:string>acoustic</json:string><json:string>voice change trials</json:string><json:string>voice discrimination</json:string><json:string>change trials</json:string><json:string>linguistic information</json:string><json:string>familiar language</json:string><json:string>voice identification</json:string><json:string>same language</json:string><json:string>test trials</json:string><json:string>experimental psychology</json:string><json:string>infant voice discernment</json:string><json:string>speech perception</json:string><json:string>other languages</json:string><json:string>language familiarity</json:string><json:string>sound structure</json:string><json:string>human perception</json:string><json:string>japanese voices</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>infant</json:string><json:string>acoustic measures</json:string><json:string>indexical information</json:string><json:string>cognitive psychology</json:string><json:string>adult listeners</json:string><json:string>unfamiliar language</json:string><json:string>auditory stimuli</json:string><json:string>voice change</json:string><json:string>developmental science</json:string><json:string>acoustical society</json:string><json:string>speech signal</json:string><json:string>fundamental frequency</json:string><json:string>second language</json:string><json:string>english listeners</json:string><json:string>dutch speaker</json:string><json:string>voice recognition capabilities</json:string><json:string>mother tongue</json:string><json:string>support voice discrimination</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>language discrimination</json:string><json:string>native language voice</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>native phonology</json:string><json:string>chinese speakers</json:string><json:string>phonetic information</json:string><json:string>unfamiliar languages</json:string><json:string>english voices</json:string><json:string>acoustic measurements</json:string><json:string>english stimuli</json:string><json:string>language discrimination studies</json:string><json:string>language pair</json:string><json:string>japanese speakers</json:string><json:string>dutch speakers</json:string><json:string>italian speakers</json:string><json:string>language sets</json:string><json:string>word prosody</json:string><json:string>language experience</json:string><json:string>habituation phase</json:string><json:string>test phase</json:string><json:string>infant recognition</json:string><json:string>visual stimulus</json:string><json:string>stimulus presentation</json:string><json:string>little work</json:string><json:string>speech conditions</json:string><json:string>average habituation trials</json:string><json:string>unmodified stimuli</json:string><json:string>voice changes</json:string><json:string>dutch voices</json:string><json:string>dutch infants</json:string><json:string>native language voices</json:string><json:string>language comprehension</json:string><json:string>early infancy</json:string><json:string>acoustic distinctiveness</json:string><json:string>dutch voice recordings</json:string><json:string>same recordings</json:string><json:string>linguistic experience</json:string><json:string>different sentences</json:string><json:string>word recognition</json:string><json:string>wider range</json:string><json:string>language experience hypothesis</json:string><json:string>further support</json:string><json:string>dutch stimuli</json:string><json:string>language familiarity effects</json:string><json:string>similar voices</json:string><json:string>familiar names</json:string><json:string>successful voice discrimination</json:string><json:string>same time</json:string><json:string>mcqueen cutler</json:string><json:string>houston jusczyk</json:string><json:string>heugten johnson</json:string><json:string>rhythmic structure</json:string><json:string>language acquisition research</json:string><json:string>sound patterns</json:string><json:string>linguistic message</json:string><json:string>stimulus variability</json:string><json:string>forensic linguistics</json:string><json:string>acoustic properties</json:string><json:string>face recognition</json:string><json:string>native tongue</json:string><json:string>talker identification</json:string><json:string>early word representations</json:string><json:string>dutch</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Elizabeth K. Johnson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ellen Westrek</name><affiliations><json:string>Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thierry Nazzi</name><affiliations><json:string>Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anne Cutler</name><affiliations><json:string>Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>DESC1052</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.788</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1032</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7127</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46061</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>149</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Developmental Science</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1363-755X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1467-7687</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>DESC</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>1002</first><last>1011</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>PAPER</value></json:item></subject></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, experimental</json:string><json:string>psychology, developmental</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>developmental & child psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</json:string></doi><id>A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Elizabeth K.</forename><surname>Johnson</surname></persName><affiliation> Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Ellen</forename><surname>Westrek</surname></persName><affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Thierry</forename><surname>Nazzi</surname></persName><affiliation> Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Anne</forename><surname>Cutler</surname></persName><affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation> MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Developmental Science</title><idno type="pISSN">1363-755X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-7687</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1002">1002</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1011">1011</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">DESC1052</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>PAPER</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687</doi><issn type="print">1363-755X</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-7687</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="DESC"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE">Developmental Science</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/desc.2011.14.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="DESC1052"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">PAPERS</title><title type="articleCategory">PAPER</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.0.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-12-29"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-04-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-23"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1002">1002</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1011">1011</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Elizabeth K. Johnson, 3359 Mississauga Road N., Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L 1C6; e‐mail: <email>elizabeth.johnson@utoronto.ca</email></correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:DESC.DESC1052.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received: 31 August 2009 Accepted: 17 January 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title><title type="shortAuthors">Elizabeth K. Johnson <i>et al</i>.</title><title type="short">Infant voice discernment</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Elizabeth K.</givenNames><familyName>Johnson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Ellen</givenNames><familyName>Westrek</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Thierry</givenNames><familyName>Nazzi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Anne</givenNames><familyName>Cutler</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation> Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation> Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation> MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Infant voice discernment</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elizabeth K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Johnson</namePart><affiliation> Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ellen</namePart><namePart type="family">Westrek</namePart><affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thierry</namePart><namePart type="family">Nazzi</namePart><affiliation> Université Paris Descartes (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158), France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anne</namePart><namePart type="family">Cutler</namePart><affiliation> Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation> MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><edition>Received: 31 August 2009 Accepted: 17 January 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">A visual fixation study tested whether 7‐month‐olds can discriminate between different talkers. The infants were first habituated to talkers producing sentences in either a familiar or unfamiliar language, then heard test sentences from previously unheard speakers, either in the language used for habituation, or in another language. When the language at test mismatched that in habituation, infants always noticed the change. When language remained constant and only talker altered, however, infants detected the change only if the language was the native tongue. Adult listeners with a different native tongue from the infants did not reproduce the discriminability patterns shown by the infants, and infants detected neither voice nor language changes in reversed speech; both these results argue against explanation of the native‐language voice discrimination in terms of acoustic properties of the stimuli. The ability to identify talkers is, like many other perceptual abilities, strongly influenced by early life experience.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Developmental Science</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>PAPER</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1363-755X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-7687</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">DESC</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1002</start><end>1011</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">DESC1052</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001137 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001137 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A5E27A493545EEF3801FEFF87E3B361DB8151351
|texte= Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |