‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
Identifieur interne : 000C06 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C05; suivant : 000C07‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
Auteurs : Donald BloxhamSource :
- History [ 0018-2648 ] ; 2002-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Adjutant decimal files, Administrative division records, Administrative files, Administrative matters, Aggressive warfare, Alfried, Alfried krupp, American occupation, American zone, April, Assistant secretary, Bloxham, British policy, British zone, Chief prosecutors, Concentration camps, Continental nations, Control council, Crimes branch, Crimes executive, Crimes trials, Criminal activities, Donald bloxham, Elwyn, Elwyn jones, Elwyn jones papers, Erhard milch, Executive order, Final report, French authorities, Further trials, General correspondence, General thrust, German affairs, German crimes, German department, German industrialists, German policy, German soldiers, Hartley shawcross, Historical association, Historical context, Hjalmar schacht, Howard petersen, Ibid, Impossible peace, Industrialist, Interested parties, International trial, Jackson papers, Judge advocate department, July, Krupp, Krupp issue, London agreement, Lord chancellor, Memo, Morgenthau plan, Nara, Nazi party, Nuremberg, Nuremberg trial, Nuremberg trials, Occwc, Occwc programme, Omgus, Permanent secretary, Political disposition, Political opinion, Prem sargent, Priscilla dale jones, Programme, Royal warrant, Royal warrant trials, Second half, Second trial, Secret memo, Shawcross, Signature illegible, Sprecher papers, State department, Subsequent nuremberg proceedings, Subsequent trials, Telford taylor, Third reich, Trial programme, Tusa, Wartime british government.
Abstract
This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-229X.00213
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><author><name sortKey="Bloxham, Donald" sort="Bloxham, Donald" uniqKey="Bloxham D" first="Donald" last="Bloxham">Donald Bloxham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southampton</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C06</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C06</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><author><name sortKey="Bloxham, Donald" sort="Bloxham, Donald" uniqKey="Bloxham D" first="Donald" last="Bloxham">Donald Bloxham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southampton</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">History</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-229X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01">2002-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="41">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="60">60</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno></series><idno type="istex">721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HIST213</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjutant decimal files</term><term>Administrative division records</term><term>Administrative files</term><term>Administrative matters</term><term>Aggressive warfare</term><term>Alfried</term><term>Alfried krupp</term><term>American occupation</term><term>American zone</term><term>April</term><term>Assistant secretary</term><term>Bloxham</term><term>British policy</term><term>British zone</term><term>Chief prosecutors</term><term>Concentration camps</term><term>Continental nations</term><term>Control council</term><term>Crimes branch</term><term>Crimes executive</term><term>Crimes trials</term><term>Criminal activities</term><term>Donald bloxham</term><term>Elwyn</term><term>Elwyn jones</term><term>Elwyn jones papers</term><term>Erhard milch</term><term>Executive order</term><term>Final report</term><term>French authorities</term><term>Further trials</term><term>General correspondence</term><term>General thrust</term><term>German affairs</term><term>German crimes</term><term>German department</term><term>German industrialists</term><term>German policy</term><term>German soldiers</term><term>Hartley shawcross</term><term>Historical association</term><term>Historical context</term><term>Hjalmar schacht</term><term>Howard petersen</term><term>Ibid</term><term>Impossible peace</term><term>Industrialist</term><term>Interested parties</term><term>International trial</term><term>Jackson papers</term><term>Judge advocate department</term><term>July</term><term>Krupp</term><term>Krupp issue</term><term>London agreement</term><term>Lord chancellor</term><term>Memo</term><term>Morgenthau plan</term><term>Nara</term><term>Nazi party</term><term>Nuremberg</term><term>Nuremberg trial</term><term>Nuremberg trials</term><term>Occwc</term><term>Occwc programme</term><term>Omgus</term><term>Permanent secretary</term><term>Political disposition</term><term>Political opinion</term><term>Prem sargent</term><term>Priscilla dale jones</term><term>Programme</term><term>Royal warrant</term><term>Royal warrant trials</term><term>Second half</term><term>Second trial</term><term>Secret memo</term><term>Shawcross</term><term>Signature illegible</term><term>Sprecher papers</term><term>State department</term><term>Subsequent nuremberg proceedings</term><term>Subsequent trials</term><term>Telford taylor</term><term>Third reich</term><term>Trial programme</term><term>Tusa</term><term>Wartime british government</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>nuremberg</json:string><json:string>historical association</json:string><json:string>july</json:string><json:string>krupp</json:string><json:string>programme</json:string><json:string>bloxham</json:string><json:string>shawcross</json:string><json:string>april</json:string><json:string>elwyn</json:string><json:string>nuremberg trial</json:string><json:string>final report</json:string><json:string>tusa</json:string><json:string>donald bloxham</json:string><json:string>alfried</json:string><json:string>second trial</json:string><json:string>elwyn jones</json:string><json:string>administrative files</json:string><json:string>crimes trials</json:string><json:string>occwc</json:string><json:string>chief prosecutors</json:string><json:string>international trial</json:string><json:string>omgus</json:string><json:string>ibid</json:string><json:string>british zone</json:string><json:string>jackson papers</json:string><json:string>control council</json:string><json:string>assistant secretary</json:string><json:string>impossible peace</json:string><json:string>industrialist</json:string><json:string>british policy</json:string><json:string>alfried krupp</json:string><json:string>executive order</json:string><json:string>german soldiers</json:string><json:string>howard petersen</json:string><json:string>german crimes</json:string><json:string>general correspondence</json:string><json:string>telford taylor</json:string><json:string>memo</json:string><json:string>subsequent nuremberg proceedings</json:string><json:string>nazi party</json:string><json:string>morgenthau plan</json:string><json:string>concentration camps</json:string><json:string>subsequent trials</json:string><json:string>american occupation</json:string><json:string>third reich</json:string><json:string>political disposition</json:string><json:string>hartley shawcross</json:string><json:string>continental nations</json:string><json:string>london agreement</json:string><json:string>krupp issue</json:string><json:string>second half</json:string><json:string>adjutant decimal files</json:string><json:string>crimes branch</json:string><json:string>occwc programme</json:string><json:string>judge advocate department</json:string><json:string>hjalmar schacht</json:string><json:string>german policy</json:string><json:string>priscilla dale jones</json:string><json:string>general thrust</json:string><json:string>prem sargent</json:string><json:string>aggressive warfare</json:string><json:string>signature illegible</json:string><json:string>german department</json:string><json:string>criminal activities</json:string><json:string>nuremberg trials</json:string><json:string>french authorities</json:string><json:string>german industrialists</json:string><json:string>administrative division records</json:string><json:string>state department</json:string><json:string>elwyn jones papers</json:string><json:string>secret memo</json:string><json:string>permanent secretary</json:string><json:string>wartime british government</json:string><json:string>interested parties</json:string><json:string>lord chancellor</json:string><json:string>sprecher papers</json:string><json:string>administrative matters</json:string><json:string>royal warrant</json:string><json:string>trial programme</json:string><json:string>erhard milch</json:string><json:string>historical context</json:string><json:string>royal warrant trials</json:string><json:string>american zone</json:string><json:string>german affairs</json:string><json:string>further trials</json:string><json:string>political opinion</json:string><json:string>crimes executive</json:string><json:string>nara</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Donald Bloxham</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Southampton</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>HIST213</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.14</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>430.984 x 648.752 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>595</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9209</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>53318</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>95</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>History</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-229X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0018-2648</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1468-229X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>HIST</json:string></publisherId><volume>87</volume><issue>285</issue><pages><first>41</first><last>60</last><total>20</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>historical studies</json:string><json:string>history</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/1468-229X.00213</json:string></doi><id>721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>The Historical Association 2002</p></availability><date>2002</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Donald</forename><surname>Bloxham</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Southampton</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">History</title><idno type="pISSN">0018-2648</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-229X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-229X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="41">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="60">60</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HIST213</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-12-13">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-02-9">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-229X</doi><issn type="print">0018-2648</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-229X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HIST"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="HISTORY">History</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01285"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/hist.2002.87.issue-285</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="87">87</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="285">285</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-01">January 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0004100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HIST213"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="20"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>The Historical Association 2002</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="41">41</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="60">60</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HIST.HIST213.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Donald</givenNames><familyName>Bloxham</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Southampton</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Donald</namePart><namePart type="family">Bloxham</namePart><affiliation>University of Southampton</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>History</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0018-2648</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-229X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-229X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HIST</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>87</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>285</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>41</start><end>60</end><total>20</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HIST213</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">The Historical Association 2002</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1
|texte= ‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |