How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
Identifieur interne : 000392 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000391; suivant : 000393How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
Auteurs : Birte Moeller ; Christian FringsSource :
- Experimental psychology [ 2190-5142 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- diagnosis : Automatism.
- Humans, Music, Practice (Psychology), Stroop Test.
Abstract
Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronnat (2013) investigated a musical variant of the reversed Stroop effect. According to the authors, one big advantage of this variant is that the automaticity of note naming can be better controlled than in other Stroop variants as musicians are very practiced in note reading whereas non-musicians are not. In this comment we argue that at present the exact impact of automaticity in this Stroop variant remains somewhat unclear for at least three reasons, namely due to the type of information that is automatically retrieved when notes are encountered, due to the possible influence of object-based attention, and finally due to the fact that the exact influence of expertise on interference cannot be pinpointed with an extreme group design.
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000204
PubMed: 24449648
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24449648Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24449648</idno><idno type="pmid">24449648</idno><idno type="doi">10.1027/1618-3169/a000204</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000392</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000392</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Experimental psychology</title><idno type="eISSN">2190-5142</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Automatism (diagnosis)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Music</term><term>Practice (Psychology)</term><term>Stroop Test</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Automatism</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Music</term><term>Practice (Psychology)</term><term>Stroop Test</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronnat (2013) investigated a musical variant of the reversed Stroop effect. According to the authors, one big advantage of this variant is that the automaticity of note naming can be better controlled than in other Stroop variants as musicians are very practiced in note reading whereas non-musicians are not. In this comment we argue that at present the exact impact of automaticity in this Stroop variant remains somewhat unclear for at least three reasons, namely due to the type of information that is automatically retrieved when notes are encountered, due to the possible influence of object-based attention, and finally due to the fact that the exact influence of expertise on interference cannot be pinpointed with an extreme group design.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24449648</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2190-5142</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>61</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>01</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Experimental psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Exp Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>68-70</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1027/1618-3169/a000204</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronnat (2013) investigated a musical variant of the reversed Stroop effect. According to the authors, one big advantage of this variant is that the automaticity of note naming can be better controlled than in other Stroop variants as musicians are very practiced in note reading whereas non-musicians are not. In this comment we argue that at present the exact impact of automaticity in this Stroop variant remains somewhat unclear for at least three reasons, namely due to the type of information that is automatically retrieved when notes are encountered, due to the possible influence of object-based attention, and finally due to the fact that the exact influence of expertise on interference cannot be pinpointed with an extreme group design.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moeller</LastName><ForeName>Birte</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frings</LastName><ForeName>Christian</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Trier, Germany </Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016420">Comment</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Exp Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101138477</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1618-3169</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentOn"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):80-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24449652</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentOn"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):269-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23548983</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001332" MajorTopicYN="N">Automatism</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnosis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009146" MajorTopicYN="Y">Music</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011214" MajorTopicYN="Y">Practice (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057190" MajorTopicYN="Y">Stroop Test</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Stroop Effect</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">automatism</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">musical expertise</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">retrieval of motoric patterns</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24449648</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">N801600G57320527</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1027/1618-3169/a000204</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000392 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000392 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24449648
|texte= How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24449648" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |