Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
Identifieur interne : 000362 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000361; suivant : 000363Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
Auteurs : Birte Moeller ; Hartmut Sch Chinger ; Christian FringsSource :
- Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE [ 1940-087X ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Selection tasks in which simple stimuli (e.g. letters) are presented and a target stimulus has to be selected against one or more distractor stimuli are frequently used in the research on human action control. One important question in these settings is how distractor stimuli, competing with the target stimulus for a response, influence actions. The distractor-response binding paradigm can be used to investigate this influence. It is particular useful to separately analyze response retrieval and distractor inhibition effects. Computer-based experiments are used to collect the data (reaction times and error rates). In a number of sequentially presented pairs of stimulus arrays (prime-probe design), participants respond to targets while ignoring distractor stimuli. Importantly, the factors response relation in the arrays of each pair (repetition vs. change) and distractor relation (repetition vs. change) are varied orthogonally. The repetition of the same distractor then has a different effect depending on response relation (repetition vs. change) between arrays. This result pattern can be explained by response retrieval due to distractor repetition. In addition, distractor inhibition effects are indicated by a general advantage due to distractor repetition. The described paradigm has proven useful to determine relevant parameters for response retrieval effects on human action.
DOI: 10.3791/51571
PubMed: 24893586
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24893586Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University; moellerb@uni-trier.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sch Chinger, Hartmut" sort="Sch Chinger, Hartmut" uniqKey="Sch Chinger H" first="Hartmut" last="Sch Chinger">Hartmut Sch Chinger</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinical Psychophysiology Unit, Institute of Psychobiology, Trier University.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24893586</idno><idno type="pmid">24893586</idno><idno type="doi">10.3791/51571</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000362</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000362</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University; moellerb@uni-trier.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sch Chinger, Hartmut" sort="Sch Chinger, Hartmut" uniqKey="Sch Chinger H" first="Hartmut" last="Sch Chinger">Hartmut Sch Chinger</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinical Psychophysiology Unit, Institute of Psychobiology, Trier University.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE</title><idno type="eISSN">1940-087X</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attention</term><term>Humans</term><term>Inhibition (Psychology)</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Perception</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attention</term><term>Humans</term><term>Inhibition (Psychology)</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Perception</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Selection tasks in which simple stimuli (e.g. letters) are presented and a target stimulus has to be selected against one or more distractor stimuli are frequently used in the research on human action control. One important question in these settings is how distractor stimuli, competing with the target stimulus for a response, influence actions. The distractor-response binding paradigm can be used to investigate this influence. It is particular useful to separately analyze response retrieval and distractor inhibition effects. Computer-based experiments are used to collect the data (reaction times and error rates). In a number of sequentially presented pairs of stimulus arrays (prime-probe design), participants respond to targets while ignoring distractor stimuli. Importantly, the factors response relation in the arrays of each pair (repetition vs. change) and distractor relation (repetition vs. change) are varied orthogonally. The repetition of the same distractor then has a different effect depending on response relation (repetition vs. change) between arrays. This result pattern can be explained by response retrieval due to distractor repetition. In addition, distractor inhibition effects are indicated by a general advantage due to distractor repetition. The described paradigm has proven useful to determine relevant parameters for response retrieval effects on human action.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24893586</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1940-087X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Issue>87</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>May</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Vis Exp</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3791/51571</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Selection tasks in which simple stimuli (e.g. letters) are presented and a target stimulus has to be selected against one or more distractor stimuli are frequently used in the research on human action control. One important question in these settings is how distractor stimuli, competing with the target stimulus for a response, influence actions. The distractor-response binding paradigm can be used to investigate this influence. It is particular useful to separately analyze response retrieval and distractor inhibition effects. Computer-based experiments are used to collect the data (reaction times and error rates). In a number of sequentially presented pairs of stimulus arrays (prime-probe design), participants respond to targets while ignoring distractor stimuli. Importantly, the factors response relation in the arrays of each pair (repetition vs. change) and distractor relation (repetition vs. change) are varied orthogonally. The repetition of the same distractor then has a different effect depending on response relation (repetition vs. change) between arrays. This result pattern can be explained by response retrieval due to distractor repetition. In addition, distractor inhibition effects are indicated by a general advantage due to distractor repetition. The described paradigm has proven useful to determine relevant parameters for response retrieval effects on human action.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moeller</LastName><ForeName>Birte</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University; moellerb@uni-trier.de.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schächinger</LastName><ForeName>Hartmut</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Clinical Psychophysiology Unit, Institute of Psychobiology, Trier University.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frings</LastName><ForeName>Christian</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Trier University.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D059040">Video-Audio Media</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Vis Exp</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101313252</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1940-087X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):932-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16846289</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):482-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15910132</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):742-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19379047</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2176-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21097861</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2011;58(2):125-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20705549</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Emot. 2011 Feb;25(2):342-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21432676</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1174-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21553991</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;214(1):121-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21822951</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1209-27</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21707218</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):373-87</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22081277</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):570-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22428679</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;59(5):258-64</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22580408</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 May;75(4):700-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23392625</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):809-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24131363</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):101-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14979754</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Oct;60(10):1367-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17853245</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):591-611</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4081102</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15491903</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):959-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24627211</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12239891</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007266" MajorTopicYN="Y">Inhibition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008960" MajorTopicYN="Y">Models, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010465" MajorTopicYN="N">Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011930" MajorTopicYN="N">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4188189</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>31</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24893586</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3791/51571</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4188189</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000362 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000362 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24893586
|texte= Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24893586" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |