The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
Identifieur interne : 000153 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000152; suivant : 000154The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
Auteurs : Birte Moeller ; Christian Frings ; Roland PfisterSource :
- Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance [ 1939-1277 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Human action control is influenced by bindings between perceived stimuli and responses carried out in their presence. Notably, responses given to a target stimulus can also be integrated with additional response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that accompany the target (distractor-response binding). Subsequently reencountering such a distractor then retrieves the associated response. Although a large body of evidence supports the existence of this effect, the specific structure of distractor-response bindings is still unclear. Here, we test the predictions derived from 2 possible assumptions about the structure of bindings between distractors and responses. According to a configural approach, the entire distractor object is integrated with a response, and only upon repetition of the entire distractor object the associated response would be retrieved. According to an elemental approach, one would predict integration of individual distractor features with the response and retrieval due to the repetition of an individual distractor feature. Four experiments indicate that both, configural and elemental bindings exist and specify boundary conditions for each type of binding. These findings provide detailed insights into the architecture of bindings between response-irrelevant stimuli and actions and thus allow for specifying how distractor stimuli influence human behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000158
PubMed: 26501840
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26501840Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pfister, Roland" sort="Pfister, Roland" uniqKey="Pfister R" first="Roland" last="Pfister">Roland Pfister</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26501840</idno><idno type="pmid">26501840</idno><idno type="doi">10.1037/xhp0000158</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000153</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000153</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pfister, Roland" sort="Pfister, Roland" uniqKey="Pfister R" first="Roland" last="Pfister">Roland Pfister</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><idno type="eISSN">1939-1277</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Attention</term><term>Color Perception</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Space Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Attention</term><term>Color Perception</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Space Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Human action control is influenced by bindings between perceived stimuli and responses carried out in their presence. Notably, responses given to a target stimulus can also be integrated with additional response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that accompany the target (distractor-response binding). Subsequently reencountering such a distractor then retrieves the associated response. Although a large body of evidence supports the existence of this effect, the specific structure of distractor-response bindings is still unclear. Here, we test the predictions derived from 2 possible assumptions about the structure of bindings between distractors and responses. According to a configural approach, the entire distractor object is integrated with a response, and only upon repetition of the entire distractor object the associated response would be retrieved. According to an elemental approach, one would predict integration of individual distractor features with the response and retrieval due to the repetition of an individual distractor feature. Four experiments indicate that both, configural and elemental bindings exist and specify boundary conditions for each type of binding. These findings provide detailed insights into the architecture of bindings between response-irrelevant stimuli and actions and thus allow for specifying how distractor stimuli influence human behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26501840</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1939-1277</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>42</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>464-79</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1037/xhp0000158</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Human action control is influenced by bindings between perceived stimuli and responses carried out in their presence. Notably, responses given to a target stimulus can also be integrated with additional response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that accompany the target (distractor-response binding). Subsequently reencountering such a distractor then retrieves the associated response. Although a large body of evidence supports the existence of this effect, the specific structure of distractor-response bindings is still unclear. Here, we test the predictions derived from 2 possible assumptions about the structure of bindings between distractors and responses. According to a configural approach, the entire distractor object is integrated with a response, and only upon repetition of the entire distractor object the associated response would be retrieved. According to an elemental approach, one would predict integration of individual distractor features with the response and retrieval due to the repetition of an individual distractor feature. Four experiments indicate that both, configural and elemental bindings exist and specify boundary conditions for each type of binding. These findings provide detailed insights into the architecture of bindings between response-irrelevant stimuli and actions and thus allow for specifying how distractor stimuli influence human behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moeller</LastName><ForeName>Birte</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-6179-2214</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frings</LastName><ForeName>Christian</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pfister</LastName><ForeName>Roland</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>26</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7502589</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0096-1523</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003118" MajorTopicYN="Y">Color Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011939" MajorTopicYN="Y">Mental Recall</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011930" MajorTopicYN="Y">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013028" MajorTopicYN="Y">Space Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26501840</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">2015-48433-001</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1037/xhp0000158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000153 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000153 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26501840
|texte= The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26501840" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |