A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?
Identifieur interne : 000141 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000140; suivant : 000142A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?
Auteurs : Birte Moeller ; Roland Pfister ; Wilfried Kunde ; Christian FringsSource :
- Attention, perception & psychophysics [ 1943-393X ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Short-term bindings between responses and events in the environment ensure efficient behavioral control. This notion holds true for two particular types of binding: bindings between responses and response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that are present at the time of responding, and also for bindings between responses and the effects they cause. Although both types of binding have been extensively studied in the past, little is known about their interrelation. In three experiments, we analyzed both types of binding processes in a distractor-response binding design and in a response-effect binding design, which yielded two central findings: (1) Distractor-response binding and response-effect binding effects were observed not only in their native, but also in the corresponding "non-native" design, and (2) a manipulation of retrieval delay affected both types of bindings in a similar way. We suggest that a general and unselective mechanism is responsible for integrating own responses with a large variety of stimuli.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1
PubMed: 26810573
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26810573Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany. moellerb@uni-trier.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pfister, Roland" sort="Pfister, Roland" uniqKey="Pfister R" first="Roland" last="Pfister">Roland Pfister</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kunde, Wilfried" sort="Kunde, Wilfried" uniqKey="Kunde W" first="Wilfried" last="Kunde">Wilfried Kunde</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26810573</idno><idno type="pmid">26810573</idno><idno type="doi">10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000141</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000141</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?</title><author><name sortKey="Moeller, Birte" sort="Moeller, Birte" uniqKey="Moeller B" first="Birte" last="Moeller">Birte Moeller</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany. moellerb@uni-trier.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pfister, Roland" sort="Pfister, Roland" uniqKey="Pfister R" first="Roland" last="Pfister">Roland Pfister</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kunde, Wilfried" sort="Kunde, Wilfried" uniqKey="Kunde W" first="Wilfried" last="Kunde">Wilfried Kunde</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><idno type="eISSN">1943-393X</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Short-term bindings between responses and events in the environment ensure efficient behavioral control. This notion holds true for two particular types of binding: bindings between responses and response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that are present at the time of responding, and also for bindings between responses and the effects they cause. Although both types of binding have been extensively studied in the past, little is known about their interrelation. In three experiments, we analyzed both types of binding processes in a distractor-response binding design and in a response-effect binding design, which yielded two central findings: (1) Distractor-response binding and response-effect binding effects were observed not only in their native, but also in the corresponding "non-native" design, and (2) a manipulation of retrieval delay affected both types of bindings in a similar way. We suggest that a general and unselective mechanism is responsible for integrating own responses with a large variety of stimuli.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="In-Data-Review" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26810573</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCreated><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1943-393X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>78</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Atten Percept Psychophys</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1074-86</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Short-term bindings between responses and events in the environment ensure efficient behavioral control. This notion holds true for two particular types of binding: bindings between responses and response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that are present at the time of responding, and also for bindings between responses and the effects they cause. Although both types of binding have been extensively studied in the past, little is known about their interrelation. In three experiments, we analyzed both types of binding processes in a distractor-response binding design and in a response-effect binding design, which yielded two central findings: (1) Distractor-response binding and response-effect binding effects were observed not only in their native, but also in the corresponding "non-native" design, and (2) a manipulation of retrieval delay affected both types of bindings in a similar way. We suggest that a general and unselective mechanism is responsible for integrating own responses with a large variety of stimuli.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moeller</LastName><ForeName>Birte</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany. moellerb@uni-trier.de.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pfister</LastName><ForeName>Roland</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kunde</LastName><ForeName>Wilfried</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frings</LastName><ForeName>Christian</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Atten Percept Psychophys</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101495384</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1943-3921</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cognitive control and automaticity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Perception and Action</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26810573</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000141 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000141 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26810573
|texte= A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26810573" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |