Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].

Identifieur interne : 000046 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000045; suivant : 000047

[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].

Auteurs : V. Beierlein ; V. Köllner ; R. Neu ; H. Schulz

Source :

RBID : pubmed:27923240

Abstract

Objectives: The assessment of work pressures is of particular importance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. An established questionnaire is the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (German abbr. AVEM), but it is quite long and with regard to scoring time-consuming in routine clinical care. It should therefore be tested, whether a shortened version of the AVEM can be developed, which is able to assess the formerly described three second-order factors of the AVEM, namely Working Commitment, Resilience, and Emotions, sufficiently reliable and valid, and which also may be used for screening of patients with prominent work-related behavior and experience patterns. Methods: Data were collected at admission from consecutive samples of three hospitals of psychosomatic rehabilitation (N = 10,635 patients). The sample was randomly divided in two subsamples (design and validation sample). Using exploratory principal component analyses in the design sample, items with the highest factor loadings for the three new scales were selected and evaluated psychometrically using the validation sample. Possible Cut-off values ought to be derived from distribution patterns of scores in the scales. Relationships with sociodemographic, occupational and diagnosis-related characteristics, as well as with patterns of work-related experiences and behaviors are examined. Results: The three performed principal component analyses explained in the design sample on the respective first factor between 31 % and 34 % of the variance. The selected 20 items were assigned to the 3-factor structure in the validation sample as expected. The three new scales are sufficiently reliable with values of Cronbach's α between 0,84 and 0,88. The naming of the three new scales is based on the names of the secondary factors. Cut-off values for the identification of distinctive patient-reported data are proposed. Conclusion: Main advantages of the proposed shortened version AVEM-3D are that with a considerable smaller number of items the three main dimensions of relevant work-related behavior and experience patterns can be reliably measured. The proposed measure is simple and economic to use and interpret. Based on the present sample we provide means and standard deviations as reference at admission of psychosomatic rehabilitation. As a limitation it should be mentioned that further evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change restricted to the items of the shortened version is necessary. The practicability and validity of the proposed cut-off values cannot yet be conclusively assessed. Finally, the validity of the AVEM-3D in groups of indications other than psychosomatic patients and in healthy persons remains to be examined.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-120232
PubMed: 27923240

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:27923240

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Beierlein, V" sort="Beierlein, V" uniqKey="Beierlein V" first="V" last="Beierlein">V. Beierlein</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kollner, V" sort="Kollner, V" uniqKey="Kollner V" first="V" last="Köllner">V. Köllner</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Reha-Zentrum Seehof, Teltow.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Neu, R" sort="Neu, R" uniqKey="Neu R" first="R" last="Neu">R. Neu</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Trier.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schulz, H" sort="Schulz, H" uniqKey="Schulz H" first="H" last="Schulz">H. Schulz</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:27923240</idno>
<idno type="pmid">27923240</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1055/s-0042-120232</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000046</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000046</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Beierlein, V" sort="Beierlein, V" uniqKey="Beierlein V" first="V" last="Beierlein">V. Beierlein</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kollner, V" sort="Kollner, V" uniqKey="Kollner V" first="V" last="Köllner">V. Köllner</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Reha-Zentrum Seehof, Teltow.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Neu, R" sort="Neu, R" uniqKey="Neu R" first="R" last="Neu">R. Neu</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Trier.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schulz, H" sort="Schulz, H" uniqKey="Schulz H" first="H" last="Schulz">H. Schulz</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Die Rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1439-1309</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objectives: The assessment of work pressures is of particular importance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. An established questionnaire is the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (German abbr. AVEM), but it is quite long and with regard to scoring time-consuming in routine clinical care. It should therefore be tested, whether a shortened version of the AVEM can be developed, which is able to assess the formerly described three second-order factors of the AVEM, namely Working Commitment, Resilience, and Emotions, sufficiently reliable and valid, and which also may be used for screening of patients with prominent work-related behavior and experience patterns. Methods: Data were collected at admission from consecutive samples of three hospitals of psychosomatic rehabilitation (N = 10,635 patients). The sample was randomly divided in two subsamples (design and validation sample). Using exploratory principal component analyses in the design sample, items with the highest factor loadings for the three new scales were selected and evaluated psychometrically using the validation sample. Possible Cut-off values ought to be derived from distribution patterns of scores in the scales. Relationships with sociodemographic, occupational and diagnosis-related characteristics, as well as with patterns of work-related experiences and behaviors are examined. Results: The three performed principal component analyses explained in the design sample on the respective first factor between 31 % and 34 % of the variance. The selected 20 items were assigned to the 3-factor structure in the validation sample as expected. The three new scales are sufficiently reliable with values of Cronbach's α between 0,84 and 0,88. The naming of the three new scales is based on the names of the secondary factors. Cut-off values for the identification of distinctive patient-reported data are proposed. Conclusion: Main advantages of the proposed shortened version AVEM-3D are that with a considerable smaller number of items the three main dimensions of relevant work-related behavior and experience patterns can be reliably measured. The proposed measure is simple and economic to use and interpret. Based on the present sample we provide means and standard deviations as reference at admission of psychosomatic rehabilitation. As a limitation it should be mentioned that further evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change restricted to the items of the shortened version is necessary. The practicability and validity of the proposed cut-off values cannot yet be conclusively assessed. Finally, the validity of the AVEM-3D in groups of indications other than psychosomatic patients and in healthy persons remains to be examined.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="In-Process" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">27923240</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1439-1309</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>55</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>Dec</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Die Rehabilitation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Rehabilitation (Stuttg)</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>348-356</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">Objectives: The assessment of work pressures is of particular importance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. An established questionnaire is the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (German abbr. AVEM), but it is quite long and with regard to scoring time-consuming in routine clinical care. It should therefore be tested, whether a shortened version of the AVEM can be developed, which is able to assess the formerly described three second-order factors of the AVEM, namely Working Commitment, Resilience, and Emotions, sufficiently reliable and valid, and which also may be used for screening of patients with prominent work-related behavior and experience patterns. Methods: Data were collected at admission from consecutive samples of three hospitals of psychosomatic rehabilitation (N = 10,635 patients). The sample was randomly divided in two subsamples (design and validation sample). Using exploratory principal component analyses in the design sample, items with the highest factor loadings for the three new scales were selected and evaluated psychometrically using the validation sample. Possible Cut-off values ought to be derived from distribution patterns of scores in the scales. Relationships with sociodemographic, occupational and diagnosis-related characteristics, as well as with patterns of work-related experiences and behaviors are examined. Results: The three performed principal component analyses explained in the design sample on the respective first factor between 31 % and 34 % of the variance. The selected 20 items were assigned to the 3-factor structure in the validation sample as expected. The three new scales are sufficiently reliable with values of Cronbach's α between 0,84 and 0,88. The naming of the three new scales is based on the names of the secondary factors. Cut-off values for the identification of distinctive patient-reported data are proposed. Conclusion: Main advantages of the proposed shortened version AVEM-3D are that with a considerable smaller number of items the three main dimensions of relevant work-related behavior and experience patterns can be reliably measured. The proposed measure is simple and economic to use and interpret. Based on the present sample we provide means and standard deviations as reference at admission of psychosomatic rehabilitation. As a limitation it should be mentioned that further evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change restricted to the items of the shortened version is necessary. The practicability and validity of the proposed cut-off values cannot yet be conclusively assessed. Finally, the validity of the AVEM-3D in groups of indications other than psychosomatic patients and in healthy persons remains to be examined.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Beierlein</LastName>
<ForeName>V</ForeName>
<Initials>V</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Köllner</LastName>
<ForeName>V</ForeName>
<Initials>V</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Reha-Zentrum Seehof, Teltow.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Neu</LastName>
<ForeName>R</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Trier.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Schulz</LastName>
<ForeName>H</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Stiftungslehrstuhl Klinische Versorgungsforschung, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>ger</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="">English Abstract</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<VernacularTitle>Ein Verfahren zum Screening dreier Dimensionen arbeitsbezogener Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster in der psychosomatischen Rehabilitation – Vorschlag für eine Kurzform AVEM-3D.</VernacularTitle>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Rehabilitation (Stuttg)</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0401273</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0034-3536</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27923240</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1055/s-0042-120232</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:27923240
   |texte=   [A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:27923240" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024