Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!
Identifieur interne : 000268 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000267; suivant : 000269Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!
Auteurs : Georg Halbeisen [Allemagne] ; Eva WaltherSource :
- Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) [ 1747-0226 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to changes in liking that are due to the pairing of stimuli. Although the question of whether a secondary task can interfere with the occurrence of EC is of great theoretical relevance, previous research has not obtained a consistent pattern of results. Whereas in some studies EC remains intact under dual-task conditions, in others a secondary task resulted in reduced or diminished EC. In order to reconcile these inconsistent findings, we hypothesized that dual-task interference in EC depends on the similarity of demands incurred by processing the stimuli used in the conditioning procedure and the secondary task. Specifically, we assumed that interference only occurs when similar verbal or visuospatial demands are imposed. In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated the occurrence of EC under conditions of a demanding 3-back working memory task while using either orthographic or pictorial stimuli to manipulate verbal and visuospatial processing demands, respectively. Relative to conditions using dissimilar types of stimuli, we found that the 3-back task interfered with the occurrence of EC only when the same types of stimuli were used. The implications for the underlying processes of EC are discussed.
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1002506
PubMed: 25607718
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25607718Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!</title><author><name sortKey="Halbeisen, Georg" sort="Halbeisen, Georg" uniqKey="Halbeisen G" first="Georg" last="Halbeisen">Georg Halbeisen</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>a Department of Psychology , University of Trier , Trier , Germany.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>a Department of Psychology , University of Trier , Trier </wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walther, Eva" sort="Walther, Eva" uniqKey="Walther E" first="Eva" last="Walther">Eva Walther</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25607718</idno><idno type="pmid">25607718</idno><idno type="doi">10.1080/17470218.2014.1002506</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000298</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000298</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000298</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000298</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000298</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000298</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!</title><author><name sortKey="Halbeisen, Georg" sort="Halbeisen, Georg" uniqKey="Halbeisen G" first="Georg" last="Halbeisen">Georg Halbeisen</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>a Department of Psychology , University of Trier , Trier , Germany.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>a Department of Psychology , University of Trier , Trier </wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Trier </wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walther, Eva" sort="Walther, Eva" uniqKey="Walther E" first="Eva" last="Walther">Eva Walther</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><idno type="eISSN">1747-0226</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Association Learning (physiology)</term><term>Conditioning, Classical (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Memory, Short-Term (physiology)</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual (physiology)</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Recognition (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Verbal Learning</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Association Learning</term><term>Conditioning, Classical</term><term>Memory, Short-Term</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Verbal Learning</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to changes in liking that are due to the pairing of stimuli. Although the question of whether a secondary task can interfere with the occurrence of EC is of great theoretical relevance, previous research has not obtained a consistent pattern of results. Whereas in some studies EC remains intact under dual-task conditions, in others a secondary task resulted in reduced or diminished EC. In order to reconcile these inconsistent findings, we hypothesized that dual-task interference in EC depends on the similarity of demands incurred by processing the stimuli used in the conditioning procedure and the secondary task. Specifically, we assumed that interference only occurs when similar verbal or visuospatial demands are imposed. In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated the occurrence of EC under conditions of a demanding 3-back working memory task while using either orthographic or pictorial stimuli to manipulate verbal and visuospatial processing demands, respectively. Relative to conditions using dissimilar types of stimuli, we found that the 3-back task interfered with the occurrence of EC only when the same types of stimuli were used. The implications for the underlying processes of EC are discussed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25607718</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1747-0226</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>68</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>2008-21</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1080/17470218.2014.1002506</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to changes in liking that are due to the pairing of stimuli. Although the question of whether a secondary task can interfere with the occurrence of EC is of great theoretical relevance, previous research has not obtained a consistent pattern of results. Whereas in some studies EC remains intact under dual-task conditions, in others a secondary task resulted in reduced or diminished EC. In order to reconcile these inconsistent findings, we hypothesized that dual-task interference in EC depends on the similarity of demands incurred by processing the stimuli used in the conditioning procedure and the secondary task. Specifically, we assumed that interference only occurs when similar verbal or visuospatial demands are imposed. In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated the occurrence of EC under conditions of a demanding 3-back working memory task while using either orthographic or pictorial stimuli to manipulate verbal and visuospatial processing demands, respectively. Relative to conditions using dissimilar types of stimuli, we found that the 3-back task interfered with the occurrence of EC only when the same types of stimuli were used. The implications for the underlying processes of EC are discussed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Halbeisen</LastName><ForeName>Georg</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>a Department of Psychology , University of Trier , Trier , Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Walther</LastName><ForeName>Eva</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101259775</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1747-0218</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001245" MajorTopicYN="N">Association Learning</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003214" MajorTopicYN="N">Conditioning, Classical</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008570" MajorTopicYN="N">Memory, Short-Term</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010364" MajorTopicYN="N">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010775" MajorTopicYN="N">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021641" MajorTopicYN="N">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014706" MajorTopicYN="N">Verbal Learning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Associative learning</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Attitudes</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Automaticity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Process dissociation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Working memory</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25607718</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/17470218.2014.1002506</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Walther, Eva" sort="Walther, Eva" uniqKey="Walther E" first="Eva" last="Walther">Eva Walther</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Halbeisen, Georg" sort="Halbeisen, Georg" uniqKey="Halbeisen G" first="Georg" last="Halbeisen">Georg Halbeisen</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000268 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000268 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25607718
|texte= Dual-task interference in evaluative conditioning: Similarity matters!
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25607718" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a UnivTrevesV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |